Man Utd Thread:

Started by full back, November 10, 2006, 08:13:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cunny Funt

Quote from: statto on January 21, 2025, 10:13:50 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on January 20, 2025, 07:08:11 PM
Quote from: Jeepers Creepers on January 20, 2025, 06:09:53 PMAnthony to Real Betis on loan seems a done deal. Garnacho to Napoli story seem to be gathering pace. Interesting few weeks ahead.
Letting Garnacho go for 50m is bonkers. They'll not sign anyone to do his job for anything less than 100.
That 7 premier league goals last season be easily enough replaced.  He was outscored by Hudson-Odoi, Kluivert, Bailey, Trossard, Semenyo, Hee-Chan in the league last year not one of which would be anywhere close to 100 million. 

None one are close to 19 years of age last season either. At this moment in time he's not 100 million but sold for anything less for 70 million will prove the incompetence level of the new lads over transfers and not much of improvement on Woodward, Matt Judge etc.

clonian

Quote from: Cunny Funt on January 21, 2025, 01:59:44 PM
Quote from: statto on January 21, 2025, 10:13:50 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on January 20, 2025, 07:08:11 PM
Quote from: Jeepers Creepers on January 20, 2025, 06:09:53 PMAnthony to Real Betis on loan seems a done deal. Garnacho to Napoli story seem to be gathering pace. Interesting few weeks ahead.
Letting Garnacho go for 50m is bonkers. They'll not sign anyone to do his job for anything less than 100.
That 7 premier league goals last season be easily enough replaced.  He was outscored by Hudson-Odoi, Kluivert, Bailey, Trossard, Semenyo, Hee-Chan in the league last year not one of which would be anywhere close to 100 million. 

None one are close to 19 years of age last season either. At this moment in time he's not 100 million but sold for anything less for 70 million will prove the incompetence level of the new lads over transfers and not much of improvement on Woodward, Matt Judge etc.

The problem is how much United would have to pay for a better player than him. But if he's got his agent whoring him around he can clear off too. Didn't work for Rashford and his ballbag brother though

statto

Quote from: Cunny Funt on January 21, 2025, 01:59:44 PM
Quote from: statto on January 21, 2025, 10:13:50 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on January 20, 2025, 07:08:11 PM
Quote from: Jeepers Creepers on January 20, 2025, 06:09:53 PMAnthony to Real Betis on loan seems a done deal. Garnacho to Napoli story seem to be gathering pace. Interesting few weeks ahead.
Letting Garnacho go for 50m is bonkers. They'll not sign anyone to do his job for anything less than 100.
That 7 premier league goals last season be easily enough replaced.  He was outscored by Hudson-Odoi, Kluivert, Bailey, Trossard, Semenyo, Hee-Chan in the league last year not one of which would be anywhere close to 100 million. 

None one are close to 19 years of age last season either. At this moment in time he's not 100 million but sold for anything less for 70 million will prove the incompetence level of the new lads over transfers and not much of improvement on Woodward, Matt Judge etc.
My point is to say that his contribution of last season could easily be replaced for alot less than £100 million. 

Liverpool have spent less than £40 million on both Diaz and Gakpo in the not too recent past as wide attackers, Newcastle similar on Anthony Gordon, Kulusevski at Spurs £25 million all who bring more consistency of performance to the table than Garnacho on, so it proves that there are players out there with less baggage that in the right setting can flourish at big clubs. 

United have held out hope that Rashford would be consistent for years to their detriment, if Garnacho is hard work be better getting rid and trying to establish a better culture across the club.  Sir Alex with Pogba was a fine example of someone who was too much baggage and pushed out the door.  The tail has been wagging the dog at OT for too long. 

NAG1

Quote from: statto on January 21, 2025, 02:51:29 PM
Quote from: Cunny Funt on January 21, 2025, 01:59:44 PM
Quote from: statto on January 21, 2025, 10:13:50 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on January 20, 2025, 07:08:11 PM
Quote from: Jeepers Creepers on January 20, 2025, 06:09:53 PMAnthony to Real Betis on loan seems a done deal. Garnacho to Napoli story seem to be gathering pace. Interesting few weeks ahead.
Letting Garnacho go for 50m is bonkers. They'll not sign anyone to do his job for anything less than 100.
That 7 premier league goals last season be easily enough replaced.  He was outscored by Hudson-Odoi, Kluivert, Bailey, Trossard, Semenyo, Hee-Chan in the league last year not one of which would be anywhere close to 100 million. 

None one are close to 19 years of age last season either. At this moment in time he's not 100 million but sold for anything less for 70 million will prove the incompetence level of the new lads over transfers and not much of improvement on Woodward, Matt Judge etc.
My point is to say that his contribution of last season could easily be replaced for alot less than £100 million. 

Liverpool have spent less than £40 million on both Diaz and Gakpo in the not too recent past as wide attackers, Newcastle similar on Anthony Gordon, Kulusevski at Spurs £25 million all who bring more consistency of performance to the table than Garnacho on, so it proves that there are players out there with less baggage that in the right setting can flourish at big clubs. 

United have held out hope that Rashford would be consistent for years to their detriment, if Garnacho is hard work be better getting rid and trying to establish a better culture across the club.  Sir Alex with Pogba was a fine example of someone who was too much baggage and pushed out the door.  The tail has been wagging the dog at OT for too long.

Think Garnacho's issue is the contract he signed not so long ago, he came through and signed the contract quickly and on a lot less money than Mainoo and not Amad have been given. So probably not helping his mood.


gallsman

Quote from: Cunny Funt on January 21, 2025, 01:59:44 PM
Quote from: statto on January 21, 2025, 10:13:50 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on January 20, 2025, 07:08:11 PM
Quote from: Jeepers Creepers on January 20, 2025, 06:09:53 PMAnthony to Real Betis on loan seems a done deal. Garnacho to Napoli story seem to be gathering pace. Interesting few weeks ahead.
Letting Garnacho go for 50m is bonkers. They'll not sign anyone to do his job for anything less than 100.
That 7 premier league goals last season be easily enough replaced.  He was outscored by Hudson-Odoi, Kluivert, Bailey, Trossard, Semenyo, Hee-Chan in the league last year not one of which would be anywhere close to 100 million. 

None one are close to 19 years of age last season either. At this moment in time he's not 100 million but sold for anything less for 70 million will prove the incompetence level of the new lads over transfers and not much of improvement on Woodward, Matt Judge etc.

Nobody is paying 70m for Garnacho. He perhaps burned a touch brighter, but it's the Macheda/Januzaj/Elanga story all over again.

That said, Elanga is playing terrifically at the minute. Pity it's got Forest.

AustinPowers

Quote from: NAG1 on January 21, 2025, 03:49:33 PM
Quote from: statto on January 21, 2025, 02:51:29 PM
Quote from: Cunny Funt on January 21, 2025, 01:59:44 PM
Quote from: statto on January 21, 2025, 10:13:50 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on January 20, 2025, 07:08:11 PM
Quote from: Jeepers Creepers on January 20, 2025, 06:09:53 PMAnthony to Real Betis on loan seems a done deal. Garnacho to Napoli story seem to be gathering pace. Interesting few weeks ahead.
Letting Garnacho go for 50m is bonkers. They'll not sign anyone to do his job for anything less than 100.
That 7 premier league goals last season be easily enough replaced.  He was outscored by Hudson-Odoi, Kluivert, Bailey, Trossard, Semenyo, Hee-Chan in the league last year not one of which would be anywhere close to 100 million. 

None one are close to 19 years of age last season either. At this moment in time he's not 100 million but sold for anything less for 70 million will prove the incompetence level of the new lads over transfers and not much of improvement on Woodward, Matt Judge etc.
My point is to say that his contribution of last season could easily be replaced for alot less than £100 million. 

Liverpool have spent less than £40 million on both Diaz and Gakpo in the not too recent past as wide attackers, Newcastle similar on Anthony Gordon, Kulusevski at Spurs £25 million all who bring more consistency of performance to the table than Garnacho on, so it proves that there are players out there with less baggage that in the right setting can flourish at big clubs. 

United have held out hope that Rashford would be consistent for years to their detriment, if Garnacho is hard work be better getting rid and trying to establish a better culture across the club.  Sir Alex with Pogba was a fine example of someone who was too much baggage and pushed out the door.  The tail has been wagging the dog at OT for too long.

Think Garnacho's issue is the contract he signed not so long ago, he came through and signed the contract quickly and on a lot less money than Mainoo and not Amad have been given. So probably not helping his mood.



Boo hoo. I would imagine he's on 75k+ a  week.  How much money do these boys  need ffs?

If that's  pissing him off  and affecting his training/mood, then there's the door. Out ye go...

Blowitupref

#53946


Posted by Sky Sports. Worth taking into account the other players are on teams that have many attacking talents that create many chances per game compared to United. Garnacho had recent goal involvements against the best two in England Liverpool, Arsenal.

If he was a troublesome player I can imagine he'd be getting the same treatment as Rashford is getting under Amorim. I see the media are now suggesting Rashford is training away hard in the background in the hope of making the match day squad again.

Is the ref going to finally blow his whistle?... No, he's going to blow his nose

Armagh18

Quote from: Blowitupref on January 21, 2025, 04:46:54 PM

Posted by Sky Sports. Worth taking into account the other players are on teams that have many attacking talents that create many chances per game compared to United. Garnacho had recent goal involvements against the best two in England Liverpool, Arsenal.

If he was a troublesome player I can imagine he'd be getting the same treatment as Rashford is getting under Amorim. I see the media are now suggesting Rashford is training away hard in the background in the hope of making the match day squad again.


Think people forget how young he is as well. Definitely worth keeping.

gallsman

What happens if you change that to, say January 1st 2024? Nobody is saying he doesn't have talent or potential. He's showing neither at the minute and evidently his attitude is rotten. He's soft as f**k too.

Blowitupref

The latest speculation with journalists Is that Ruben Amorim unleashed a rage in the dressing room after the Brighton defeat including damaging a big screen television.

Is the ref going to finally blow his whistle?... No, he's going to blow his nose

Armagh18

Quote from: Blowitupref on January 21, 2025, 05:27:57 PMThe latest speculation with journalists Is that Ruben Amorim unleashed a rage in the dressing room after the Brighton defeat including damaging a big screen television.


Seen that, fair play to him. Who the f**k is leaking that though.

Armagh18

Quote from: gallsman on January 21, 2025, 05:25:12 PMWhat happens if you change that to, say January 1st 2024? Nobody is saying he doesn't have talent or potential. He's showing neither at the minute and evidently his attitude is rotten. He's soft as f**k too.
Theres a long list of players I'd be sending out the door before Garnacho. Unfortunately he's probably one of the few players not on mad money and who other teams may actually want to sign.

Milltown Row2

Quote from: Armagh18 on January 21, 2025, 05:37:11 PM
Quote from: Blowitupref on January 21, 2025, 05:27:57 PMThe latest speculation with journalists Is that Ruben Amorim unleashed a rage in the dressing room after the Brighton defeat including damaging a big screen television.


Seen that, fair play to him. Who the f**k is leaking that though.

A friend of mine son, is a sports journalist in Sheffield, but is primarily with one club. The amount of stuff players leak to him is crazy.. most of the stuff would be unprintable and he'd only put out a lighter version on the rest.

The players aren't even doing it for money lol, probably just spoilt brats
None of us are getting out of here alive, so please stop treating yourself like an after thought.

thewobbler

Thought for the day.

Do we place omertà on too high a pedestal when it comes to team building?

quit yo jibbajabba

Never heard tell of him