Author Topic: Congress  (Read 1601 times)

Eamonnca1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6908
  • Catching the world in my headlights of justice
    • View Profile
Re: Congress
« Reply #15 on: March 16, 2021, 07:44:52 PM »
Quote
Motion 24: This motion proposes to extend the scope of the rule dealing with abuse of a racist, sectarian, or anti-inclusion nature against an opponent to also include such abuse against a match official.

Unsurprisingly passed by acclaim
Guess this means any derogatory reference to "free staters" will now carry a stern sanction

Great stuff - so as well as racist and sectarian bigotry not being tolerated, anti-Irish bigotry by people from Northern Ireland will not be tolerated

Quote
Motion 26: Propose to make it a foul to distract someone by waving hurl/arms while they are taking a puck-out/kick-out or sideline puck/kick.

Passed by acclaim
Good God

Imagine passing this motion for puckouts and sidelines but then bizarrely not for frees

Who the f**k comes up with this nonsense

If someone takes a free and puts it wide after someone's been distracting him, he can take it again.

delgany

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 665
    • View Profile
Re: Congress
« Reply #16 on: March 16, 2021, 07:58:40 PM »
Quote
Motion 24: This motion proposes to extend the scope of the rule dealing with abuse of a racist, sectarian, or anti-inclusion nature against an opponent to also include such abuse against a match official.

Unsurprisingly passed by acclaim
Guess this means any derogatory reference to "free staters" will now carry a stern sanction

Great stuff - so as well as racist and sectarian bigotry not being tolerated, anti-Irish bigotry by people from Northern Ireland will not be tolerated

Quote
Motion 26: Propose to make it a foul to distract someone by waving hurl/arms while they are taking a puck-out/kick-out or sideline puck/kick.

Passed by acclaim
Good God

Imagine passing this motion for puckouts and sidelines but then bizarrely not for frees

Who the f**k comes up with this nonsense

I think , the frees were already in the rules

johnnycool

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2569
    • View Profile
Re: Congress
« Reply #17 on: March 17, 2021, 09:39:54 AM »
Quote
Motion 24: This motion proposes to extend the scope of the rule dealing with abuse of a racist, sectarian, or anti-inclusion nature against an opponent to also include such abuse against a match official.

Unsurprisingly passed by acclaim
Guess this means any derogatory reference to "free staters" will now carry a stern sanction

Great stuff - so as well as racist and sectarian bigotry not being tolerated, anti-Irish bigotry by people from Northern Ireland will not be tolerated

Quote
Motion 26: Propose to make it a foul to distract someone by waving hurl/arms while they are taking a puck-out/kick-out or sideline puck/kick.

Passed by acclaim
Good God

Imagine passing this motion for puckouts and sidelines but then bizarrely not for frees

Who the f**k comes up with this nonsense

I think , the frees were already in the rules

You can still stand with your arms/hurl in the air, just can't move them.

TBH I never knew this was an issue, but there you go.