Author Topic: Jay Donnelly  (Read 3377 times)

downjim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
Jay Donnelly
« on: January 11, 2019, 09:52:48 AM »
Whatís your views men? It looks brutal for Cliftonville, that wee girls life is ruined

screenexile

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10222
  • Up The Screen!
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2019, 09:56:29 AM »
Horrible!! He sounds like a complete halfwit and deserves to be locked up because he was old enough to know better.

Surely Cliftonville have to let him go as well. . .

Tony Baloney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14107
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2019, 10:27:36 AM »
I have read varying reports on the age of the girl. What are the facts here? The various ghetto dwellers from Crusaders, Linfield etc are calling him a paedophile etc. but I believe the girl was 17 which is within the age of consent for sex (leaving aside the distribution of the photo). If this actually the case then how is the offence against "a child"?

GetOverTheBar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 680
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2019, 10:30:14 AM »
I have read varying reports on the age of the girl. What are the facts here? The various ghetto dwellers from Crusaders, Linfield etc are calling him a paedophile etc. but I believe the girl was 17 which is within the age of consent for sex (leaving aside the distribution of the photo). If this actually the case then how is the offence against "a child"?

16 when photo was taken.

Tony Baloney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14107
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2019, 10:34:16 AM »
I have read varying reports on the age of the girl. What are the facts here? The various ghetto dwellers from Crusaders, Linfield etc are calling him a paedophile etc. but I believe the girl was 17 which is within the age of consent for sex (leaving aside the distribution of the photo). If this actually the case then how is the offence against "a child"?

16 when photo was taken.
Ah right that makes more sense then. Certainly not a paedophile as the great unwashed as saying but a very foolish fella although sharing photos on Whatsapp is hardly unique these days.

toby47

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2019, 10:37:34 AM »
I have read varying reports on the age of the girl. What are the facts here? The various ghetto dwellers from Crusaders, Linfield etc are calling him a paedophile etc. but I believe the girl was 17 which is within the age of consent for sex (leaving aside the distribution of the photo). If this actually the case then how is the offence against "a child"?

16 when photo was taken.

Is 16 classified as under age, or is 15 and below under age? He was 20/21 at the time.

Sent the picture to his mates. 1 mate privately & 10 Cliftonville team mates in a groupchat.

Must be an eejit. The photos I seen she looked to be posing in one of them, but again once you send them around and they go viral your in bother.

GetOverTheBar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 680
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2019, 10:38:14 AM »
Not a great situation for the lad. Hard to defend it, but whoever in his group of mates then sent it to the wider public via facebook also deserves 4 months for me. The name is widely suspected but nothing will come of that I assume.

downjim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2019, 10:41:32 AM »
Reading stuff on twitter about him and the brother, hard to know what to believe but itís a lesson for all sports clubs

general_lee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1600
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2019, 10:57:48 AM »
The whole age thing isnít the (main) issue here for me, itís the fact he sent his mates the pictures. Doesnít matter if she was 16 or 36, itís a complete sc**bag act. 4 months is a let off, his defence are appealing and part of the basis is that he is of such low intelligence that he is bordering on having a learning difficulty  ::)

trailer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1261
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2019, 11:03:38 AM »
Very sad for the girl involved.

HiMucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1873
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2019, 11:23:23 AM »
The whole age thing isnít the (main) issue here for me, itís the fact he sent his mates the pictures. Doesnít matter if she was 16 or 36, itís a complete sc**bag act. 4 months is a let off, his defence are appealing and part of the basis is that he is of such low intelligence that he is bordering on having a learning difficulty  ::)
This

Kidder81

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 453
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #11 on: January 11, 2019, 11:27:53 AM »
The whole age thing isnít the (main) issue here for me, itís the fact he sent his mates the pictures. Doesnít matter if she was 16 or 36, itís a complete sc**bag act. 4 months is a let off, his defence are appealing and part of the basis is that he is of such low intelligence that he is bordering on having a learning difficulty  ::)

Mental health issues no doubt

johnnycool

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 845
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #12 on: January 11, 2019, 11:31:14 AM »
The whole age thing isnít the (main) issue here for me, itís the fact he sent his mates the pictures. Doesnít matter if she was 16 or 36, itís a complete sc**bag act. 4 months is a let off, his defence are appealing and part of the basis is that he is of such low intelligence that he is bordering on having a learning difficulty  ::)

f**ker knew what he was at; A, having sex with a child and B, sending the pictures to his mates when she allegedly told him to delete it. sc**bag actions.

4 months getting the hole rid off him in prison will cure his willingness to share his dirty deeds on social media and maybe be a lesson to other scumbags inclined to do the same.


Kidder81

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 453
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #13 on: January 11, 2019, 11:36:43 AM »
Is his Da the ďcommentatorĒ Chris Donnelly ?

screenexile

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10222
  • Up The Screen!
    • View Profile
Re: Jay Donnelly
« Reply #14 on: January 11, 2019, 11:38:13 AM »
Just asking a question maybe one of our legal experts can answer?

Why is she considered a child for the charge of distributing images but there is no issue with him having sex with her because she was the legal age for consent??!!