Poll

Does this board need stricter moderation

Yes - Ban anyone who breaches the 'incitement' rule immediately
10 (8.1%)
Yes - But only if there is a repeated pattern
49 (39.5%)
No - Things are fine
55 (44.4%)
No - There should be less moderation
10 (8.1%)

Total Members Voted: 124

Author Topic: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No  (Read 8719 times)

laoislad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10960
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #15 on: October 06, 2017, 04:12:40 PM »
What would really put manners in some is if they were banned and couldn't see the website until their ban is up, i know they can't post whilst banned but the way the Armagh forum was if you got banned you can't access any part of the site ;)
Wouldn't work as the board isn't a members only board.Anyone can still read the board if they are a member or not.

It's been mentioned before but never came to fruition but I'd be happy to pay a fee for membership.
I don't know if there is much running costs to keep the board going but if there was anything left over after paying the running costs the money could go to a different charity every year.

You're clearly a MOD looking money or you're wealthy and don't care. What about us Northerners who have no money and no one likes us ;)
Bet you have no problem giving pornhub a fiver  ;)
Joe Mcdonagh Champions 2019

brokencrossbar1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8361
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #16 on: October 06, 2017, 04:15:45 PM »
What would really put manners in some is if they were banned and couldn't see the website until their ban is up, i know they can't post whilst banned but the way the Armagh forum was if you got banned you can't access any part of the site ;)
Wouldn't work as the board isn't a members only board.Anyone can still read the board if they are a member or not.

It's been mentioned before but never came to fruition but I'd be happy to pay a fee for membership.
I don't know if there is much running costs to keep the board going but if there was anything left over after paying the running costs the money could go to a different charity every year.

You're clearly a MOD looking money or you're wealthy and don't care. What about us Northerners who have no money and no one likes us ;)
Bet you have no problem giving pornhub a fiver  ;)

Neither do you if you know the cost😂

Cunny Funt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3223
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #17 on: October 06, 2017, 04:33:30 PM »
I voted for Yes - But only if there is a repeated pattern... as its the most sensible option.

The trolling is getting a bit out of hand on here when even a WUM like syferus is getting annoyed.

Syferus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15840
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #18 on: October 06, 2017, 05:19:58 PM »
I voted for Yes - But only if there is a repeated pattern... as its the most sensible option.

The trolling is getting a bit out of hand on here when even a WUM like syferus is getting annoyed.

You'd get caught out on the multiple personalities stipulation - don't be the turkey voting for Christmas.

Eamonnca1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5735
  • Catching the world in my headlights of justice
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #19 on: October 06, 2017, 06:26:21 PM »
Not much point in having rules if they're not enforced.

T Fearon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #20 on: October 06, 2017, 07:19:30 PM »
Some people get away with murder,alluding by name and homeplace of convicted paedophiles who happened to be priests.People like that should be banned.

This board has lost most if not all of the early days iconic posters,so it would need to be careful it doesn't lose anymore

OgraAnDun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1235
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #21 on: October 06, 2017, 07:22:58 PM »
That sounds like a thinly veiled threat, Tony.

T Fearon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #22 on: October 06, 2017, 07:26:33 PM »
It's not.

Gabriel_Hurl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7749
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #23 on: October 06, 2017, 07:31:06 PM »
you wouldn't be missed

StGallsGAA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1782
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2017, 10:01:39 PM »
Whilst I'm not a WUM I'll gladly pay a fiver to buy Liverpool supporters some clothes/drugs in Oxfam/from their dealer  so they can get a job/high and spend less time on the board! 8) ;)

JoG2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3328
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #25 on: October 06, 2017, 10:13:56 PM »
Are wums/trolls who declare not to be wums/trolls actually wumming or are they delusional? Case in point directly above

laoislad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10960
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #26 on: October 06, 2017, 10:18:45 PM »
Are wums/trolls who declare not to be wums/trolls actually wumming or are they delusional? Case in point directly above
Posts like those above yours should get someone a ban.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2017, 10:21:07 PM by laoislad »
Joe Mcdonagh Champions 2019

StGallsGAA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1782
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #27 on: October 06, 2017, 10:26:42 PM »
Liverpool fans who can't take a bit of schtick about winning no league titles in the past 27 years, a total of one league cup in the past  10 years and Stevie G retiring in humiliation getting humped in a 6-1 thrashing at Stoke, who then resort to racist insults against the travelling community (kick down at those you perceive to be below you)  because they can't take the world laughing at their club's failure should be permanently banned.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2017, 10:28:52 PM by StGallsGAA »

Tony Baloney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14421
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #28 on: October 06, 2017, 10:32:54 PM »
Liverpool fans who can't take a bit of schtick about winning no league titles in the past 27 years, a total of one league cup in the past  10 years and Stevie G retiring in humiliation getting humped in a 6-1 thrashing at Stoke, who then resort to racist insults against the travelling community (kick down at those you perceive to be below you)  because they can't take the world laughing at their club's failure should be permanently banned.
Bants.

JoG2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3328
    • View Profile
Re: More Active/Stricter Moderation - Yes/No
« Reply #29 on: October 06, 2017, 10:49:25 PM »
Liverpool fans who can't take a bit of schtick about winning no league titles in the past 27 years, a total of one league cup in the past  10 years and Stevie G retiring in humiliation getting humped in a 6-1 thrashing at Stoke, who then resort to racist insults against the travelling community (kick down at those you perceive to be below you)  because they can't take the world laughing at their club's failure should be permanently banned.
Bants.

Indeed. In the good old days before Eamon's revolution he could have been called a dick, but even now if ye wanted to call him a dick, you couldn't call him a dick as you risk a ban... C'est la vie