Much noise about article 16 and diversion of trade and that if there is diversion of trade in NI due to the protocol, then article 16 can be invoked.
Basically if there are negative side effects of the protocol on the NI economy that's interpreted as diversion of trade.
But no matter how many times Unionists deceptively misinterpret that narrow survey of NI economy and magnify the importance of cost increases elsewhere, it cannot change the facts that NI economy has not suffered due to the protocol, in fact the opposite is more true.
The diversion of trade mantra is a red herring.
Not having a clue what diversion of trade meant, I sought help found this web site,
https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/trade-diversion/