HRH Price Charles official visit in May to ROI

[Syferus]

That anyone would defend blowing up a man beloved by the community who was out fishing with kids with the perspective of over 30 decades of reflection is a sorry statement of attitudes in some dark, dank corners of the north. Just like Loyalists should be ashamed of many acts, Republicans should be embarrassed to have their name attached to an act as reprehensible as the one at Mulloughmore.

Are you referring to Mountbatten?
Was he beloved by the community in Mulloughmore?  Beloved means dearly loved. How does that work in Sligo?

http://www.sligoheritage.com/archmbatten.htm
"For the most part they minded their business and we minded ours. We had nothing in common with them, nor they with us. Most had no idea of his close relationship to the British Royal Family, or that he was the great grand-son of the infamous Queen Victoria, nor cared".

Regardless, even if he had a love for dogs like Nixon and Hitler, it doesn't relegate Mountbatten from being the highest profile british establishment figure of the modern era to be assassinated and a prized legitimate republican target. That's historical fact, not a defence.

Yeah, ok. I know the area very well and even now Mountbatten is talked about fondly. Even Rah sympathisers I know in Sligo don't like the Mountbatten episode. But sure take a website over that.

And it's farcical to describe an elderly man and young children out fishing a 'legitimate target'. What they were was an easy target for a desperate and out-manovoured Rah, nothing more.

"he was much beloved"   and when Sy's informed that no one knew him or cared to know him and likewise from Mountbatten,  "ah sure he's talked about fondly"
Who knows Sy, maybe one day you'll realise that you spouting nonsense about any random incident, doesn't actually mean it happened.  But who am I to pass comment, maybe there's something to be said in favour of blissfully inhabiting a world of your own creation, where reality is constructed from disconnected fractured figments of dementia.

The above is a sad commentary on fringe Republicanism. Everything you've said seems to be about trying to dehumanise an atrocious act.

[Keyser soze]

That anyone would defend blowing up a man beloved by the community who was out fishing with kids with the perspective of over 30 decades of reflection is a sorry statement of attitudes in some dark, dank corners of the north. Just like Loyalists should be ashamed of many acts, Republicans should be embarrassed to have their name attached to an act as reprehensible as the one at Mulloughmore.

Are you referring to Mountbatten?
Was he beloved by the community in Mulloughmore?  Beloved means dearly loved. How does that work in Sligo?

http://www.sligoheritage.com/archmbatten.htm
"For the most part they minded their business and we minded ours. We had nothing in common with them, nor they with us. Most had no idea of his close relationship to the British Royal Family, or that he was the great grand-son of the infamous Queen Victoria, nor cared".

Regardless, even if he had a love for dogs like Nixon and Hitler, it doesn't relegate Mountbatten from being the highest profile british establishment figure of the modern era to be assassinated and a prized legitimate republican target. That's historical fact, not a defence.

Yeah, ok. I know the area very well and even now Mountbatten is talked about fondly. Even Rah sympathisers I know in Sligo don't like the Mountbatten episode. But sure take a website over that.

And it's farcical to describe an elderly man and young children out fishing a 'legitimate target'. What they were was an easy target for a desperate and out-manovoured Rah, nothing more.

"he was much beloved"   and when Sy's informed that no one knew him or cared to know him and likewise from Mountbatten,  "ah sure he's talked about fondly"
Who knows Sy, maybe one day you'll realise that you spouting nonsense about any random incident, doesn't actually mean it happened.  But who am I to pass comment, maybe there's something to be said in favour of blissfully inhabiting a world of your own creation, where reality is constructed from disconnected fractured figments of dementia.

The above is a sad commentary on fringe Republicanism. Everything you've said seems to be about trying to dehumanise an atrocious act.

Yeah cant wait to see you on the Dan Breen thread berating him for the atrocious 'crimes' that he committed.

[foxcommander]

That anyone would defend blowing up a man beloved by the community who was out fishing with kids with the perspective of over 30 decades of reflection is a sorry statement of attitudes in some dark, dank corners of the north. Just like Loyalists should be ashamed of many acts, Republicans should be embarrassed to have their name attached to an act as reprehensible as the one at Mulloughmore.

Are you referring to Mountbatten?
Was he beloved by the community in Mulloughmore?  Beloved means dearly loved. How does that work in Sligo?

http://www.sligoheritage.com/archmbatten.htm
"For the most part they minded their business and we minded ours. We had nothing in common with them, nor they with us. Most had no idea of his close relationship to the British Royal Family, or that he was the great grand-son of the infamous Queen Victoria, nor cared".

Regardless, even if he had a love for dogs like Nixon and Hitler, it doesn't relegate Mountbatten from being the highest profile british establishment figure of the modern era to be assassinated and a prized legitimate republican target. That's historical fact, not a defence.

Yeah, ok. I know the area very well and even now Mountbatten is talked about fondly. Even Rah sympathisers I know in Sligo don't like the Mountbatten episode. But sure take a website over that.

And it's farcical to describe an elderly man and young children out fishing a 'legitimate target'. What they were was an easy target for a desperate and out-manovoured Rah, nothing more.

"he was much beloved"   and when Sy's informed that no one knew him or cared to know him and likewise from Mountbatten,  "ah sure he's talked about fondly"
Who knows Sy, maybe one day you'll realise that you spouting nonsense about any random incident, doesn't actually mean it happened.  But who am I to pass comment, maybe there's something to be said in favour of blissfully inhabiting a world of your own creation, where reality is constructed from disconnected fractured figments of dementia.

The above is a sad commentary on fringe Republicanism. Everything you've said seems to be about trying to dehumanise an atrocious act.

A man who's family have been patrons of mass genocide. Beloved.