Missing Malaysia Airlines Plane.

Started by EC Unique, March 09, 2014, 10:06:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mike Sheehy

Furthermore, the US (along with Australia, China ,UK and other countries) are putting many resources and manpower toward trying to reclaim these people for their families and yet disgusting political parasites like you seek to make hay on their suffering.

This is why I despise you and Seafoid so much. You really are the scum of mankind. Always looking for an angle to push your hateful agenda.

Muck Savage

Quote from: Mike Sheehy on April 18, 2014, 02:36:36 AM
Furthermore, the US (along with Australia, China ,UK and other countries) are putting many resources and manpower toward trying to reclaim these people for their families and yet disgusting political parasites like you seek to make hay on their suffering.

This is why I despise you and Seafoid so much. You really are the scum of mankind. Always looking for an angle to push your hateful agenda.

The reason the US are putting so much resources into this is to find out the cause of the crash. People in the US want to know if there's a possibility that this can happen again to a US plane. This added to the fact the Boeing is a big employer in the US, lots of tax income etc. Recovering the bodies for the families is a long way down the list of reasons for spending the resources.


under the bar

QuoteFurthermore, the US (along with Australia, China ,UK and other countries) are putting many resources and manpower toward trying to reclaim these people for their families and yet disgusting political parasites like you seek to make hay on their suffering.

This is why I despise you and Seafoid so much. You really are the scum of mankind. Always looking for an angle to push your hateful agenda.

The reason the US are putting so much resources into this is to find out the cause of the crash. People in the US want to know if there's a possibility that this can happen again to a US plane. This added to the fact the Boeing is a big employer in the US, lots of tax income etc. Recovering the bodies for the families is a long way down the list of reasons for spending the resources.

After 5 weeks in the ocean I doubt there'd be much left to recover if anything at all.

muppet

Quote from: under the bar on April 18, 2014, 12:53:33 PM
QuoteFurthermore, the US (along with Australia, China ,UK and other countries) are putting many resources and manpower toward trying to reclaim these people for their families and yet disgusting political parasites like you seek to make hay on their suffering.

This is why I despise you and Seafoid so much. You really are the scum of mankind. Always looking for an angle to push your hateful agenda.

The reason the US are putting so much resources into this is to find out the cause of the crash. People in the US want to know if there's a possibility that this can happen again to a US plane. This added to the fact the Boeing is a big employer in the US, lots of tax income etc. Recovering the bodies for the families is a long way down the list of reasons for spending the resources.

After 5 weeks in the ocean I doubt there'd be much left to recover if anything at all.

It depends on how it hit the water. The lack of a single piece of debris suggests they are either a long way from the crash site, or it didn't crash. We saw from Sullenburger that in benign conditions an aircraft can be put down on water without it breaking up.
MWWSI 2017

J70

Quote from: muppet on April 18, 2014, 03:03:31 PM
Quote from: under the bar on April 18, 2014, 12:53:33 PM
QuoteFurthermore, the US (along with Australia, China ,UK and other countries) are putting many resources and manpower toward trying to reclaim these people for their families and yet disgusting political parasites like you seek to make hay on their suffering.

This is why I despise you and Seafoid so much. You really are the scum of mankind. Always looking for an angle to push your hateful agenda.

The reason the US are putting so much resources into this is to find out the cause of the crash. People in the US want to know if there's a possibility that this can happen again to a US plane. This added to the fact the Boeing is a big employer in the US, lots of tax income etc. Recovering the bodies for the families is a long way down the list of reasons for spending the resources.

After 5 weeks in the ocean I doubt there'd be much left to recover if anything at all.

It depends on how it hit the water. The lack of a single piece of debris suggests they are either a long way from the crash site, or it didn't crash. We saw from Sullenburger that in benign conditions an aircraft can be put down on water without it breaking up.

Not sure what Under The Bar was referring to, but there's also the issue of marine animals eating the bodies. Possibly not as quickly as would happen in shallow water, but there are still plenty of scavengers in the deep oceans.

muppet

Quote from: J70 on April 18, 2014, 03:53:54 PM
Quote from: muppet on April 18, 2014, 03:03:31 PM
Quote from: under the bar on April 18, 2014, 12:53:33 PM
QuoteFurthermore, the US (along with Australia, China ,UK and other countries) are putting many resources and manpower toward trying to reclaim these people for their families and yet disgusting political parasites like you seek to make hay on their suffering.

This is why I despise you and Seafoid so much. You really are the scum of mankind. Always looking for an angle to push your hateful agenda.

The reason the US are putting so much resources into this is to find out the cause of the crash. People in the US want to know if there's a possibility that this can happen again to a US plane. This added to the fact the Boeing is a big employer in the US, lots of tax income etc. Recovering the bodies for the families is a long way down the list of reasons for spending the resources.

After 5 weeks in the ocean I doubt there'd be much left to recover if anything at all.

It depends on how it hit the water. The lack of a single piece of debris suggests they are either a long way from the crash site, or it didn't crash. We saw from Sullenburger that in benign conditions an aircraft can be put down on water without it breaking up.

Not sure what Under The Bar was referring to, but there's also the issue of marine animals eating the bodies. Possibly not as quickly as would happen in shallow water, but there are still plenty of scavengers in the deep oceans.

Can they open the doors of a 777?
MWWSI 2017

J70

Quote from: muppet on April 18, 2014, 04:15:23 PM
Quote from: J70 on April 18, 2014, 03:53:54 PM
Quote from: muppet on April 18, 2014, 03:03:31 PM
Quote from: under the bar on April 18, 2014, 12:53:33 PM
QuoteFurthermore, the US (along with Australia, China ,UK and other countries) are putting many resources and manpower toward trying to reclaim these people for their families and yet disgusting political parasites like you seek to make hay on their suffering.

This is why I despise you and Seafoid so much. You really are the scum of mankind. Always looking for an angle to push your hateful agenda.

The reason the US are putting so much resources into this is to find out the cause of the crash. People in the US want to know if there's a possibility that this can happen again to a US plane. This added to the fact the Boeing is a big employer in the US, lots of tax income etc. Recovering the bodies for the families is a long way down the list of reasons for spending the resources.

After 5 weeks in the ocean I doubt there'd be much left to recover if anything at all.

It depends on how it hit the water. The lack of a single piece of debris suggests they are either a long way from the crash site, or it didn't crash. We saw from Sullenburger that in benign conditions an aircraft can be put down on water without it breaking up.

Not sure what Under The Bar was referring to, but there's also the issue of marine animals eating the bodies. Possibly not as quickly as would happen in shallow water, but there are still plenty of scavengers in the deep oceans.

Can they open the doors of a 777?

Are you suggesting it would drop 3 miles onto the ocean floor intact even if it survived the hit on the water in one piece, a highly unlikely event, especially in the middle of an ocean?

muppet

Quote from: J70 on April 18, 2014, 07:57:58 PM
Are you suggesting it would drop 3 miles onto the ocean floor intact even if it survived the hit on the water in one piece, a highly unlikely event, especially in the middle of an ocean?

I sure am.

If it was put down safely on the water it would be highly likely to sink intact as long as there wasn't a bad storm or whatever. If a person or people opened a door/doors then it could be exposed to the elements, but if it sank intact the pressure relief valves would probably allow water in as it sank thus avoiding a pressure differential, which could crush it.
MWWSI 2017

armaghniac

Quote from: muppet on April 18, 2014, 08:50:42 PM
If it was put down safely on the water it would be highly likely to sink intact as long as there wasn't a bad storm or whatever. If a person or people opened a door/doors then it could be exposed to the elements, but if it sank intact the pressure relief valves would probably allow water in as it sank thus avoiding a pressure differential, which could crush it.

In what circumstance would the plane fly thousands of KM in the wrong direction and then put down carefully on water?
If at first you don't succeed, then goto Plan B

muppet

Quote from: armaghniac on April 18, 2014, 09:10:46 PM
Quote from: muppet on April 18, 2014, 08:50:42 PM
If it was put down safely on the water it would be highly likely to sink intact as long as there wasn't a bad storm or whatever. If a person or people opened a door/doors then it could be exposed to the elements, but if it sank intact the pressure relief valves would probably allow water in as it sank thus avoiding a pressure differential, which could crush it.

In what circumstance would the plane fly thousands of KM in the wrong direction and then put down carefully on water?

Wrong Way Corrigan

The one thing about this Malaysian aircraft is that whatever happened doesn't appear to have been done before.
MWWSI 2017

orangeman

AUSTRALIAN officials supervising the search for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 said on Saturday that an underwater search for the black box recorder based on "pings" possibly from the device could be completed in five to seven days.

A U.S. Navy deep-sea autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) is scouring a remote stretch of the Indian Ocean floor for signs of the plane, which disappeared from radars on March 8 with 239 people on board and is believed to have crashed in the area.

After almost two months without a sign of wreckage, the current underwater search has been narrowed to a circular area with a radius of 10 km (6.2 miles) around the location in which one of four pings believed to have come from the black box recorders was detected on April 8, officials said.

"Provided the weather is favourable for launch and recovery of the AUV and we have a good run with the serviceability of the AUV, we should complete the search of the focused underwater area in five to seven days," the Joint Agency Coordination Centre told Reuters in an email.

Officials did not indicate whether they were confident that this search area would yield any new information about the flight, nor did they state what steps they would take in the event that the underwater search were to prove fruitless.

orangeman


DennistheMenace

No suprise, as i've said before I'd be shocked if they ever find it.

southdown

It won't be pretty if/when it is found.

orangeman

Indo.


The chance of finding floating debris from a missing Malaysia Airlines jetliner has become highly unlikely, and a new phase of the search would focus on a far larger area of the Indian Ocean floor, Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has said.

The international search effort for Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, which vanished on March 8 with 239 people on board, has so far failed to turn up any trace of wreckage from the plane.

Given the amount of time that has elapsed, Abbott said that efforts would now shift away from the visual searches conducted by planes and ships and towards underwater equipment capable of scouring the ocean floor with sophisticated sensors.

Abbott admitted, however, that it was possible nothing would ever be found of the jetliner.

"We will do everything we humanly can, everything we reasonably can, to solve this mystery," he told reporters in Canberra.

Authorities had focussed their search on a 10 square km (6.2 square mile) stretch of seabed about 2,000 miles northwest of Perth after detecting what they suspected was a signal from the plane's black box recorder on April 4.

But Abbott's comments appeared to be an acknowledgement that the search by a U.S. Navy Bluefin-21 underwater drone in that refined area had failed find any sign of the jetliner.

Abbott said that the new search area, which spans 700 km by 80 km, could take between 6-8 months to completely examine