All-Ireland Club Semi Finals

Started by riptorn, January 14, 2014, 03:46:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

J OGorman

Quote from: moysider on March 19, 2014, 04:36:43 PM
Quote from: J OGorman on March 19, 2014, 04:24:33 PM
Quote from: BennyCake on March 19, 2014, 03:30:34 PM
So, who's the only gay in the village St Vincent's team?

pray god theres no homo's playing gaelic fudball or we're all doomed!!  ::)

stats wise, there is prob a minimum 3 /4 gay men in each club. High time this was embraced

Is this a double entendre or do I have to give you one?

its all about give and take Moy

muppet

Quote from: J OGorman on March 19, 2014, 04:41:51 PM
Quote from: moysider on March 19, 2014, 04:36:43 PM
Quote from: J OGorman on March 19, 2014, 04:24:33 PM
Quote from: BennyCake on March 19, 2014, 03:30:34 PM
So, who's the only gay in the village St Vincent's team?

pray god theres no homo's playing gaelic fudball or we're all doomed!!  ::)

stats wise, there is prob a minimum 3 /4 gay men in each club. High time this was embraced

Is this a double entendre or do I have to give you one?

its all about give and take Moy

Boy George!
MWWSI 2017

mayogodhelpus@gmail.com

Quote from: J OGorman on March 19, 2014, 04:24:33 PM
Quote from: BennyCake on March 19, 2014, 03:30:34 PM
So, who's the only gay in the village St Vincent's team?

pray god theres no homo's playing gaelic fudball or we're all doomed!!  ::)

stats wise, there is prob a minimum 3 /4 gay men in each club. High time this was embraced

Are you saying they are three quarters of a man or 3 or 4 men?
Time to take a more chill-pill approach to life.

J OGorman

Quote from: mayogodhelpus@gmail.com on March 19, 2014, 04:48:52 PM
Quote from: J OGorman on March 19, 2014, 04:24:33 PM
Quote from: BennyCake on March 19, 2014, 03:30:34 PM
So, who's the only gay in the village St Vincent's team?

pray god theres no homo's playing gaelic fudball or we're all doomed!!  ::)

stats wise, there is prob a minimum 3 /4 gay men in each club. High time this was embraced

Are you saying they are three quarters of a man or 3 or 4 men?

depends on his state of arousal

Bingo

Quote from: muppet on March 19, 2014, 03:19:35 PM
This particular milk is now spilt.

However, I expect to see a lot of this in the coming summer.

The risk reward for the defender makes this a no brainer.

Run towards your opposite number and offload the pass late making a collision likely. If your opponent braces, as described by the ref that spoke to Bingo: "one of the signs he said for a deliberate block off the ball was the offending player tensing himself to give the hit ie he will naturally protect himself to give/take the hit". Thus if the other player tenses himself for the hit he might get a black card. Even though he doesn't move and you run into him.

The risk for the defender is, at most, a free against you that few refs would give, especially if you don't lead with the shoulder and take the hit on your own chest. But the reward is a black card against your opponent if you get it right.

You're not listening or just picking at parts. I said also that there should be movement towards the player, this makes it deliberate, a player bracing to ensure he doesn't get injured is also evidence of deliberate.

A player passing the ball and then colliding when it was unavoidable isn't deliberate and isn't a black card.

A defender attempt to achieve an advantage by feigning a foul or injury is also open to a yellow card and refs are talking about these offences as well in their briefings.

muppet

Quote from: Bingo on March 19, 2014, 05:03:11 PM
Quote from: muppet on March 19, 2014, 03:19:35 PM
This particular milk is now spilt.

However, I expect to see a lot of this in the coming summer.

The risk reward for the defender makes this a no brainer.

Run towards your opposite number and offload the pass late making a collision likely. If your opponent braces, as described by the ref that spoke to Bingo: "one of the signs he said for a deliberate block off the ball was the offending player tensing himself to give the hit ie he will naturally protect himself to give/take the hit". Thus if the other player tenses himself for the hit he might get a black card. Even though he doesn't move and you run into him.

The risk for the defender is, at most, a free against you that few refs would give, especially if you don't lead with the shoulder and take the hit on your own chest. But the reward is a black card against your opponent if you get it right.

You're not listening or just picking at parts. I said also that there should be movement towards the player, this makes it deliberate, a player bracing to ensure he doesn't get injured is also evidence of deliberate.

A player passing the ball and then colliding when it was unavoidable isn't deliberate and isn't a black card.

A defender attempt to achieve an advantage by feigning a foul or injury is also open to a yellow card and refs are talking about these offences as well in their briefings.

I agree with the first part but not the second. A player bracing to ensure he doesn't get injured, is only evidence that he doesn't want to get injured. If is a reflex.

If Mathieu Mastereaud is running at you, believe me you will brace. That doesn't mean you have deliberately tried to take him out.  ;D
MWWSI 2017

Bingo

If he was running towards me, I'd be running elsewhere, never mind your brace.  :D

Its like everything it will be open to interpetation by the ref. To me I can understand what he is saying regards the brace and Feeney is a prime example of someone reading for a hit rather than to protect himself. Its actually a no brainer to me and is similar to the clip of Tommy Freeman that they are using in the briefing - shoulder into chest of player who has played the ball.

We'll see alot more carrying on and nonsense on this rule in the summer - no doubt on that. Brace yourself for it  ;)

muppet

Quote from: Bingo on March 19, 2014, 05:25:40 PM
If he was running towards me, I'd be running elsewhere, never mind your brace.  :D

Its like everything it will be open to interpetation by the ref. To me I can understand what he is saying regards the brace and Feeney is a prime example of someone reading for a hit rather than to protect himself. Its actually a no brainer to me and is similar to the clip of Tommy Freeman that they are using in the briefing - shoulder into chest of player who has played the ball.

We'll see alot more carrying on and nonsense on this rule in the summer - no doubt on that. Brace yourself for it  ;)

I would, but I might get sanctioned!
MWWSI 2017

macdanger2

Looked like a black card when I saw it on Sunday and still looks that way having watched it again, awful tough on Feeney but winning Sam next Sept will ease the pain a bit :-P

Thought Durcan & Lydon were v good for Castlebar, Durcan worth an invite into the county squad imo along with the three other county players. Durcan may not make the hb line but he's good competition there. What age is Lydon??

Thought Barry was wasted in FF for too long. Cunniffe should have been moved onto Connolly, may not have been enough but should have been tried.

Congrats to Vincents

squire_in_navy_slacks

Richie Feeney ‏@RichieF5  Mar 18
Let my teammate's down big time. Nothing but regrets. Have to find a way to make up for it now. #MitchelsAbu


Keane

If Feeney had any interest other than body checking the oncoming Vincent's player he would have been turning in the opposite direction to the one he did.

Anyone arguing the semantics of the rule with regard to this incident is missing the point:

Look at the gif. See what happens in it? That's the EXACT thing the rule is meant to punish. The only argument to be had (and tbh it's nonsense to think there is one in this case) is whether or not the rule describes exactly what happens in the GIF because that's exactly what it's meant to punish. The rule could as well be a copy of this gif stating "See image - this is a black card".

BennyCake

Quote from: J OGorman on March 19, 2014, 04:24:33 PM
Quote from: BennyCake on March 19, 2014, 03:30:34 PM
So, who's the only gay in the village St Vincent's team?

pray god theres no homo's playing gaelic fudball or we're all doomed!!  ::)

stats wise, there is prob a minimum 3 /4 gay men in each club. High time this was embraced

There's probably a few sheepshaggers, cross dressers and doggers in each club too, but you don't hear much about embracing their lifestyle choices.

muppet

Quote from: Keane on March 19, 2014, 06:52:21 PM
If Feeney had any interest other than body checking the oncoming Vincent's player he would have been turning in the opposite direction to the one he did.

Anyone arguing the semantics of the rule with regard to this incident is missing the point:

Look at the gif. See what happens in it? That's the EXACT thing the rule is meant to punish. The only argument to be had (and tbh it's nonsense to think there is one in this case) is whether or not the rule describes exactly what happens in the GIF because that's exactly what it's meant to punish. The rule could as well be a copy of this gif stating "See image - this is a black card".


QuoteIt was literally one of the dumbest things I've ever seen anyone do on a football pitch.
Quoteyet because some moron gets himself sent off for one in the first few minutes of a big game we're lamenting the rules
QuoteI guarantee you we won't be seeing too many repeats of Feeney's stupidity
Quoteit just shows such a bad attitude

Someone like you who absolutely castigates an amateur player, that you know nothing about, anonymously on a public forum is not worth debating with.
MWWSI 2017

mayogodhelpus@gmail.com

Quote from: BennyCake on March 19, 2014, 06:59:59 PM
Quote from: J OGorman on March 19, 2014, 04:24:33 PM
Quote from: BennyCake on March 19, 2014, 03:30:34 PM
So, who's the only gay in the village St Vincent's team?

pray god theres no homo's playing gaelic fudball or we're all doomed!!  ::)

stats wise, there is prob a minimum 3 /4 gay men in each club. High time this was embraced

There's probably a few sheepshaggers, cross dressers and doggers in each club too, but you don't hear much about embracing their lifestyle choices.

Feck sake Benny, just chill out and not go turbo again.
Time to take a more chill-pill approach to life.

Keane

Quote from: muppet on March 19, 2014, 07:01:17 PM
Quote from: Keane on March 19, 2014, 06:52:21 PM
If Feeney had any interest other than body checking the oncoming Vincent's player he would have been turning in the opposite direction to the one he did.

Anyone arguing the semantics of the rule with regard to this incident is missing the point:

Look at the gif. See what happens in it? That's the EXACT thing the rule is meant to punish. The only argument to be had (and tbh it's nonsense to think there is one in this case) is whether or not the rule describes exactly what happens in the GIF because that's exactly what it's meant to punish. The rule could as well be a copy of this gif stating "See image - this is a black card".


QuoteIt was literally one of the dumbest things I've ever seen anyone do on a football pitch.
Quoteyet because some moron gets himself sent off for one in the first few minutes of a big game we're lamenting the rules
QuoteI guarantee you we won't be seeing too many repeats of Feeney's stupidity
Quoteit just shows such a bad attitude

Someone like you who absolutely castigates an amateur player, that you know nothing about, anonymously on a public forum is not worth debating with.

Really, I wouldn't have expected anything else.

And my name is David Keane, my club is Kerins O'Rahillys in Tralee and I live in Ranelagh.

I would be very surprised if Feeney took any particular exception to my description of his idiotic tackle, which he has mentioned himself let his team down.