Explosion at Boston Marathon

Started by Gabriel_Hurl, April 15, 2013, 08:10:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

EC Unique

Death penalty if found guilty. Good enough.

give her dixie

http://newsthump.com/2013/04/23/tony-blair-vindicated-after-pressure-cooker-categorised-as-wmd/

Tony Blair vindicated after pressure cooker categorised as WMD


After the surviving suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings was charged with using a weapon of mass destruction it has emerged that Tony Blair could have been right about Iraq all along.

WMDs had previously been categorised as nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, but now that a pressure cooker with a bomb inside has been added to the list it appears that the joint American/British invasion of Iraq was entirely justified.

"This totally changes everything," said an official spokesperson for Tony Blair.

"Iraq would almost certainly have had possession of pressure cookers and numerous other kitchen appliances."

"I hope everyone is going to apologise to Tony."

Blair right on WMDs

Weapons experts have warned that High street retailer Argos, whose catalogue openly boasts hardware from weapons manufacturers such as Morphy Richards and Russell Hobbs, could be stockpiling a military arsenal capable of causing widespread devastation.

"A sandwich packed with cheese and tomatoes may look harmless enough," warned one expert

"But if you place one in a Breville snack toaster for a few minutes it has the capability of causing serious burns to the chin and mouth.

"If countries like North Korea and Iran develop baked beans then it really doesn't bear thinking about."

News that modified kitchen appliances are now considered weapons of mass destruction has caused the public to review their attitudes towards mindless carnage.

"If pressure cookers are one of the main components of WMDs ,What does that make a semi-automatic assault rifle?" asked 43 year-old Clive Goodlord.
next stop, September 10, for number 4......

seafoid

Quote from: EC Unique on April 23, 2013, 10:43:50 AM
Death penalty if found guilty. Good enough.
It's better than being incinerated by drone on the word of Obama without a trial or anything

johnneycool

Quote from: EC Unique on April 23, 2013, 10:43:50 AM
Death penalty if found guilty. Good enough.

f**k it, why bother with the trial, turn the machines off now.   :o

gallsman

Quote from: EC Unique on April 23, 2013, 10:43:50 AM
Death penalty if found guilty. Good enough.

By no means certain. It's a possibility.

This bullshit from McCain and Lindsey Graham about handling him as an "enemy combatant" is laughable and a disgrace to the American judicial system.

BennyCake

Those with sandwich toasters, watch out. You could be put away for having a WMD! Jesus Christ, you couldn't make it up.

J70

Death penalty is probably an incentive to get him to make a deal and talk.

Jeepers Creepers

Wave a cheese toastie in front of his face. He'll soon start talking!!!

BennyCake

Quote from: J70 on April 23, 2013, 01:19:02 PM
Death penalty is probably an incentive to get him to make a deal and talk.

The death penalty is so that he won't ever talk again.

BennyCake

Quote from: Jeepers Creepers on April 23, 2013, 01:23:28 PM
Wave a cheese toastie in front of his face. He'll soon start talking!!!

Yeah, and scrap a plate with a knife and fork. If the toastie doesn't make him talk, that will!  ;D

J70

Quote from: BennyCake on April 23, 2013, 01:24:56 PM
Quote from: J70 on April 23, 2013, 01:19:02 PM
Death penalty is probably an incentive to get him to make a deal and talk.

The death penalty is so that he won't ever talk again.

It's leverage. He's fucked with the evidence they have. If he cooperates and talks, he might get away with life in prison.

deiseach

I find it mildly sinister that he can face the death penalty in a state that is resolutely set against the death penalty. States rights only apply to those states wanting to increase the stock of human misery.

J70

Quote from: deiseach on April 23, 2013, 02:23:21 PM
I find it mildly sinister that he can face the death penalty in a state that is resolutely set against the death penalty. States rights only apply to those states wanting to increase the stock of human misery.

It's a federal case though.

LeoMc

Quote from: johnneycool on April 23, 2013, 11:51:59 AM
Quote from: EC Unique on April 23, 2013, 10:43:50 AM
Death penalty if found guilty. Good enough.

f**k it, why bother with the trial, turn the machines off now.   :o

He did say if

The Iceman

Despite what happened i feel bad for this lad. He's only 19. Led by his big brother. Now facing the consequences for the rest of his life, hated by the whole country.
He should be punished of course and deserves it all but I do have some sympathy for him.
I will always keep myself mentally alert, physically strong and morally straight