rehabilitation.... longfox this is 4 u!

[pintsofguinness]

The Fox is spot on with everything he said- you can never eliminate risk but you must minimise it.AMA and POG are full of contradictions but I suppose that's what a discussion board is for.

What posts of mine contradict each other?

[longrunsthefox]

Just read Yahoo editors thoughts.

The real pricks are the sun, if they uncover his identity, they have cost tax payers £100,000 in finding a new identity for him.

Really his rehabilitation isn't in question as he hasn't killed anyone.

Maybe they should move him in next door to you.

Very original Pints... you used the same line with me months ago    Maybe he did live near you or some other offender who is out on licence... there are loads more than these two....

[pintsofguinness]

Suppose to be pictures of child porn he had now - I hope fox and Dubh Driocht keep their children away from them when he moves in beside them.

[Minder]

Suppose to be pictures of child porn he had now - I hope fox and Dubh Driocht keep their children away from them when he moves in beside them.

In fairness that I'd according to a Sunday rag.

[pintsofguinness]

Suppose to be pictures of child porn he had now - I hope fox and Dubh Driocht keep their children away from them when he moves in beside them.

In fairness that I'd according to a Sunday rag.

On the ITV news this evening though...

[ziggysego]

I hope fox and Dubh Driocht keep their children away from them when he moves in beside them.

[pintsofguinness]

I hope fox and Dubh Driocht keep their children away from them when he moves in beside them.

Zig, fox can speak for himself.

[gallsman]

Some of the shite on this thread is beyond belief.

We live in states that have laws based on what a majority consider to be basic morals of human beings, such as the fact that it is wrong to take a life. I'd like to see all the people advocating hanging two ten year old boys be the ones to release the trapdoor. There's not a one of you would have had the balls to do it.

Do the public in general have a right to know the details of his return to prison? Not in the slightest. Are you in danger from Jon Veneables? No. Does he pose a threat to your child? Very unlikely. Will Self on Question Time last week asked how the general public are in any way worse off by not knowing the details of his return. Can anyone here provide a (mature and coherent) response? This guy spends his life looking over his shoulder and will do until the day he dies, which due to the self-appointed vigilante nature of the red top media will probably be some day in the not too distant future.

This is a traumatic situation for Denise Fergus to be in, and the insatiable media frenzy whipped up does her no good whatsoever. The unfortunate irony in all this is that the media frenzy exists due to the public being unable to resist a gripping story. And that's exactly what this case provides, whether we like it or not. As horrific as the crime was, everybody wants to know every last detail of the case. For all the wrong reasons, it's a story that grips you and and shakes you and holds your attention, and doesn't let go.

[pintsofguinness]

Do the public in general have a right to know the details of his return to prison? Not in the slightest. Are you in danger from Jon Veneables? No. Does he pose a threat to your child? Very unlikely. Will Self on Question Time last week asked how the general public are in any way worse off by not knowing the details of his return. Can anyone here provide a (mature and coherent) response? This guy spends his life looking over his shoulder and will do until the day he dies, which due to the self-appointed vigilante nature of the red top media will probably be some day in the not too distant future.

If anyone else is charged with a crime their name, address and details of the charge are made public. Their court date is public, in most cases their trial is public. The only time details are kept private are in cases when the victim needs their privacy protected, oh and if you've previously beat a toddler to death. 

What makes me angry is the constant protection they have received  - Why don't you tell us why Venables deserves the protection neither me or you would get.

[ziggysego]

Do the public in general have a right to know the details of his return to prison? Not in the slightest. Are you in danger from Jon Veneables? No. Does he pose a threat to your child? Very unlikely. Will Self on Question Time last week asked how the general public are in any way worse off by not knowing the details of his return. Can anyone here provide a (mature and coherent) response? This guy spends his life looking over his shoulder and will do until the day he dies, which due to the self-appointed vigilante nature of the red top media will probably be some day in the not too distant future.

If anyone else is charged with a crime their name, address and details of the charge are made public. Their court date is public, in most cases their trial is public. The only time details are kept private are in cases when the victim needs their privacy protected, oh and if you've previously beat a toddler to death. 

What makes me angry is the constant protection they have received  - Why don't you tell us why Venables deserves the protection neither me or you would get.

Because as a 10 year old, the mob mentality got the better of a lot of people and wanted him dead. Some people may have / would have taken that into their own hands. A 10 year old!!

I'm not condoning what he did, how could anyone. But two wrongs do not make a right. An eye for an eye and all that.

[pintsofguinness]

He's not 10 now Zig.

[ziggysego]

He's not 10 now Zig.

So it's ok to do him physical damage?

[pintsofguinness]

He's not 10 now Zig.

So it's ok to do him physical damage?

Where did I advocate that? I think he should be locked up for life.

[gallsman]

Do the public in general have a right to know the details of his return to prison? Not in the slightest. Are you in danger from Jon Veneables? No. Does he pose a threat to your child? Very unlikely. Will Self on Question Time last week asked how the general public are in any way worse off by not knowing the details of his return. Can anyone here provide a (mature and coherent) response? This guy spends his life looking over his shoulder and will do until the day he dies, which due to the self-appointed vigilante nature of the red top media will probably be some day in the not too distant future.

If anyone else is charged with a crime their name, address and details of the charge are made public. Their court date is public, in most cases their trial is public. The only time details are kept private are in cases when the victim needs their privacy protected, oh and if you've previously beat a toddler to death. 

What makes me angry is the constant protection they have received  - Why don't you tell us why Venables deserves the protection neither me or you would get.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't read anywhere yet about him being charged with anything.

*Waits for someone to mention about how I "stood up for" Iris Robinson*

[pintsofguinness]

Do the public in general have a right to know the details of his return to prison? Not in the slightest. Are you in danger from Jon Veneables? No. Does he pose a threat to your child? Very unlikely. Will Self on Question Time last week asked how the general public are in any way worse off by not knowing the details of his return. Can anyone here provide a (mature and coherent) response? This guy spends his life looking over his shoulder and will do until the day he dies, which due to the self-appointed vigilante nature of the red top media will probably be some day in the not too distant future.

If anyone else is charged with a crime their name, address and details of the charge are made public. Their court date is public, in most cases their trial is public. The only time details are kept private are in cases when the victim needs their privacy protected, oh and if you've previously beat a toddler to death. 

What makes me angry is the constant protection they have received  - Why don't you tell us why Venables deserves the protection neither me or you would get.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't read anywhere yet about him being charged with anything.

*Waits for someone to mention about how I "stood up for" Iris Robinson*

Ok so you think the details should be made public when he's charged?