The Offical Glasgow Celtic thread

[michaelg]

Rangers to win their first league title since 2010/11?

#That's not possible. That club doesn't exist anymore.

Do most Celtic fans still trot this out?  In any case, is it not worse to miss out on 10 in a row to a new club with no hostory / pedigree?

Yes.

That's irrelevant. Sure PSG and Man city have no history or pedigree but theyre still capable of winning trophies.

All a bit petty.  Do you also now refer to the 'Glasgow Derby' as opposed to the Old Firm?

Obviously by this stage 99.9% of times it’s a wind up, but because people like you take it for real, therefore the wind up lives. Are you not just a bigot who is consumed with fantasies about the ignorant beliefs of the other side so you can feel better about your own sack of shit?

Tbh, I don't really follow Scottish football.  Just have a few pals who are Celtic fans, and find it all a bit pathetic with reference to the 'Glasgow Derby' etc.  Not quite sure how that qualifies me as a bigot.

[ned]

Rangers to win their first league title since 2010/11?

#That's not possible. That club doesn't exist anymore.

Do most Celtic fans still trot this out?  In any case, is it not worse to miss out on 10 in a row to a new club with no hostory / pedigree?

Yes.

That's irrelevant. Sure PSG and Man city have no history or pedigree but theyre still capable of winning trophies.

All a bit petty.  Do you also now refer to the 'Glasgow Derby' as opposed to the Old Firm?

Always! Like a f**king beacon. It's amazing how you and others come out of the woodwork.
Was never "Old Firm". That was a media construct. Any alliance between the two ended wkth their sectarian policies of the early 1900's.
To poster above Man City had plenty of pre PL history.

[GiveItToTheShooters]

Rangers to win their first league title since 2010/11?

#That's not possible. That club doesn't exist anymore.

Do most Celtic fans still trot this out?  In any case, is it not worse to miss out on 10 in a row to a new club with no hostory / pedigree?

Yes.

That's irrelevant. Sure PSG and Man city have no history or pedigree but theyre still capable of winning trophies.

All a bit petty.  Do you also now refer to the 'Glasgow Derby' as opposed to the Old Firm?

Obviously by this stage 99.9% of times it’s a wind up, but because people like you take it for real, therefore the wind up lives. Are you not just a bigot who is consumed with fantasies about the ignorant beliefs of the other side so you can feel better about your own sack of shit?

Not sure why he finds himself on a GAA forum either in that case. Probably to be a WUM.

[GiveItToTheShooters]

Rangers to win their first league title since 2010/11?

#That's not possible. That club doesn't exist anymore.

Do most Celtic fans still trot this out?  In any case, is it not worse to miss out on 10 in a row to a new club with no hostory / pedigree?

Yes.

That's irrelevant. Sure PSG and Man city have no history or pedigree but theyre still capable of winning trophies.

All a bit petty.  Do you also now refer to the 'Glasgow Derby' as opposed to the Old Firm?

Always! Like a f**king beacon. It's amazing how you and others come out of the woodwork.
Was never "Old Firm". That was a media construct. Any alliance between the two ended wkth their sectarian policies of the early 1900's.
To poster above Man City had plenty of pre PL history.

No they haven't.

[JimStynes]

Rangers are flying.

[screenexile]

Rangers to win their first league title since 2010/11?

#That's not possible. That club doesn't exist anymore.

Do most Celtic fans still trot this out?  In any case, is it not worse to miss out on 10 in a row to a new club with no hostory / pedigree?

Yes.

That's irrelevant. Sure PSG and Man city have no history or pedigree but theyre still capable of winning trophies.

All a bit petty.  Do you also now refer to the 'Glasgow Derby' as opposed to the Old Firm?

Always! Like a f**king beacon. It's amazing how you and others come out of the woodwork.
Was never "Old Firm". That was a media construct. Any alliance between the two ended wkth their sectarian policies of the early 1900's.
To poster above Man City had plenty of pre PL history.

No they haven't.

They’re older than Celtic and been in existence for over 120 years ... but sure they have no history!!

Any wonder why we like to wind up Celtic fans the delusions of grandeur are hilarious.

I like to see Celtic do well in Europe and beat Rangers but let’s not kid ourselves that winning 10 in a row is anything more to be celebrated than the Dubs winning their 10th Leinster last night!

Celtic not winning 10 in a row is a bigger story than them actually winning it.

[ned]

Rangers to win their first league title since 2010/11?

#That's not possible. That club doesn't exist anymore.

Do most Celtic fans still trot this out?  In any case, is it not worse to miss out on 10 in a row to a new club with no hostory / pedigree?

Yes.

That's irrelevant. Sure PSG and Man city have no history or pedigree but theyre still capable of winning trophies.

All a bit petty.  Do you also now refer to the 'Glasgow Derby' as opposed to the Old Firm?

Always! Like a f**king beacon. It's amazing how you and others come out of the woodwork.
Was never "Old Firm". That was a media construct. Any alliance between the two ended wkth their sectarian policies of the early 1900's.
To poster above Man City had plenty of pre PL history.

No they haven't.

Not sure how you measure history? They would have been one of top 8 major trophy winners in England, always had massive crowds.

[illdecide]

Rangers are flying.

Now Jim don’t have me to pay u another visit😉. Tbf Sevco have been much better than Celtic and deserve to be top but if u genuinely believe that they’ll go all season like this then you’re delusional saan. Their bad spell will come especially when the fixtures pile up for them, maybe a few injuries and a few Covid isolations and then we’ll see what they have in the locker. If after all that and come May they’re still top then they’ll deserve it

[JimStynes]

Yes and I hope that bad spell comes and lets hope this is Celtic's only bad spell because they can't afford to have another one! But at the minute we can only go on what has happened and Rangers are flying. It says it all when Celtic are hoping Rangers have a bad spell in order to have any chance of winning. I read a stat:
Last 8 games
W 2
D 3
L 3
Goals scored 15
Goals conceded 17

Shambles

[thebar]

Rangers are flying.

Now Jim don’t have me to pay u another visit😉. Tbf Sevco have been much better than Celtic and deserve to be top but if u genuinely believe that they’ll go all season like this then you’re delusional saan. Their bad spell will come especially when the fixtures pile up for them, maybe a few injuries and a few Covid isolations and then we’ll see what they have in the locker. If after all that and come May they’re still top then they’ll deserve it

Wont matter a jot when there bad patch comes...Celtic will continue to throw points away for the rest of the season and wont get near them.

[GiveItToTheShooters]

Rangers to win their first league title since 2010/11?

#That's not possible. That club doesn't exist anymore.

Do most Celtic fans still trot this out?  In any case, is it not worse to miss out on 10 in a row to a new club with no hostory / pedigree?

Yes.

That's irrelevant. Sure PSG and Man city have no history or pedigree but theyre still capable of winning trophies.

All a bit petty.  Do you also now refer to the 'Glasgow Derby' as opposed to the Old Firm?

Always! Like a f**king beacon. It's amazing how you and others come out of the woodwork.
Was never "Old Firm". That was a media construct. Any alliance between the two ended wkth their sectarian policies of the early 1900's.
To poster above Man City had plenty of pre PL history.

No they haven't.

They’re older than Celtic and been in existence for over 120 years ... but sure they have no history!!

Any wonder why we like to wind up Celtic fans the delusions of grandeur are hilarious.

I like to see Celtic do well in Europe and beat Rangers but let’s not kid ourselves that winning 10 in a row is anything more to be celebrated than the Dubs winning their 10th Leinster last night!

Celtic not winning 10 in a row is a bigger story than them actually winning it.

Yea they don't.
Most clubs are as old as that. Im talking proper history, not how the club has been on the go

[GiveItToTheShooters]

Rangers to win their first league title since 2010/11?

#That's not possible. That club doesn't exist anymore.

Do most Celtic fans still trot this out?  In any case, is it not worse to miss out on 10 in a row to a new club with no hostory / pedigree?

Yes.

That's irrelevant. Sure PSG and Man city have no history or pedigree but theyre still capable of winning trophies.

All a bit petty.  Do you also now refer to the 'Glasgow Derby' as opposed to the Old Firm?

Always! Like a f**king beacon. It's amazing how you and others come out of the woodwork.
Was never "Old Firm". That was a media construct. Any alliance between the two ended wkth their sectarian policies of the early 1900's.
To poster above Man City had plenty of pre PL history.

No they haven't.

Not sure how you measure history? They would have been one of top 8 major trophy winners in England, always had massive crowds.

The fact that theyve won more trophies since they won the lottery 12 years ago compared to the other 100 odd years previous says it all. The havent had plenty of history.

[ned]

Rangers to win their first league title since 2010/11?

#That's not possible. That club doesn't exist anymore.

Do most Celtic fans still trot this out?  In any case, is it not worse to miss out on 10 in a row to a new club with no hostory / pedigree?

Yes.

That's irrelevant. Sure PSG and Man city have no history or pedigree but theyre still capable of winning trophies.

All a bit petty.  Do you also now refer to the 'Glasgow Derby' as opposed to the Old Firm?

Always! Like a f**king beacon. It's amazing how you and others come out of the woodwork.
Was never "Old Firm". That was a media construct. Any alliance between the two ended wkth their sectarian policies of the early 1900's.
To poster above Man City had plenty of pre PL history.

No they haven't.

Not sure how you measure history? They would have been one of top 8 major trophy winners in England, always had massive crowds.

The fact that theyve won more trophies since they won the lottery 12 years ago compared to the other 100 odd years previous says it all. The havent had plenty of history.

By your reckoning there's only 3 teams with history in England then!

[screenexile]

Rangers to win their first league title since 2010/11?

#That's not possible. That club doesn't exist anymore.

Do most Celtic fans still trot this out?  In any case, is it not worse to miss out on 10 in a row to a new club with no hostory / pedigree?

Yes.

That's irrelevant. Sure PSG and Man city have no history or pedigree but theyre still capable of winning trophies.

All a bit petty.  Do you also now refer to the 'Glasgow Derby' as opposed to the Old Firm?

Always! Like a f**king beacon. It's amazing how you and others come out of the woodwork.
Was never "Old Firm". That was a media construct. Any alliance between the two ended wkth their sectarian policies of the early 1900's.
To poster above Man City had plenty of pre PL history.

No they haven't.

Not sure how you measure history? They would have been one of top 8 major trophy winners in England, always had massive crowds.

The fact that theyve won more trophies since they won the lottery 12 years ago compared to the other 100 odd years previous says it all. The havent had plenty of history.

You know that when you just make things up and call them ‘fact’ we can check them right??

City won more in their history than the past 12 years!

[general_lee]

According to wiki city have won 26 major honours in their history. 14 since 2011, the rest in the previous 130 years.