Angry dog gets his cumupance

[longrunsthefox]

A man went into the side of a pipe to light his house and out came a big black bark and started to dog at him so he took out his tail and cut the knife of it   

[tyronefan]

try that again

[longrunsthefox]

It's an experiment..

[ludermor]

Failed

[tyronefan]

Fox are you in the construction game, you seem to have a lot of time on your hands   

[Lar Naparka]

As I propose to postulate, the issues that arise around this seemingly simple statement, if any, might suggest to the uninitiated that, in a very real sense, a man - or, in this case, "the" man, who seems to have been the initiator of a seemingly unconnected sequence of actions, or to be more precise, a specific action with an accompanying or attendant series of particular reactions—particular that is in terms of time and place, be  held accountable under the terms of common law and conventional logic, for the act of pipe smoking by the dog.
Furthermore, I do propose that "the" house, which can be regarded as a non-sentient entity, should not be considered as being in any way complicit in the sequence of action and connected reactions that originated with the act of combustion, resulting in the pipe being lit and was concluded by the act of tail cutting, carried out by the dog on the man.
By the precepts of normal convention and common usage, "the" dog may not be held accountable under any legal prohibition or regulation or any other instrument that are collectively regarded as forming the codex of  law, loosely called Anti-Discrimination Acts. This premise arises out of the popular misconception on the part of the general public that the afore-mentioned act of attack was instigated by virtue of the dog's probable, or possibly possible, feeling of antipathy, as defied under terms of common usage, towards the colour of "the" man's skin, black.
In absolute terms, as meaning the implausibility of any hypothesis advanced regarding the canine's racialist predispositions being accepted, by virtue of acceptable medical research findings that "the" dog, and by extension "all" dogs, are colour blind.

I hope I have cleared up any issues arising from longrun's account of things.

[longrunsthefox]

Lars-you are as much pumped up with the exhuberance of you own verbosity that your own palpitated ignorance does not  allow you to verify what you express.

[Maiden1]

Are we supposed to unscramble??

A man went into the side of a house to light his pipe and out came a big black dog and started to bark at him so he took out his knife and cut the tail of it

Still doesn't make much sense.

[whiskeysteve]

AWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGAAAAA

[Lar Naparka]

Lars-you are as much pumped up with the exhuberance of you own verbosity that your own palpitated ignorance does not  allow you to verify what you express.

Now, now, Foxy, surely you are not implying that I suffer from a constipation of ideas and a diarrhea of expression at one and the same time?

[longrunsthefox]

Lar you are impressive but let me put this query to you... If it takes a man and a half a day and a half to dig a hole and  a half...how many apples are in a barrel of grapes? 

[ziggysego]

Eric Cantona is on Jonathan Ross tonight

[The Real Laoislad]

A Nun told me I had a big one today

[ziggysego]

A Nun told me I had a big one today

I once asked a Nun in Derry to hand me down a magazine I couldn't reach. I meant a computer magazine, but she handed me Playboy.

[ONeill]

Two nuns are cycling down a cobbled street.
The first one says "I've never come this way before."
The second one replies "Must be the cobbles"