The Many Faces of US Politics...

[trueblue1234]

See the 3rd term chat has started, a bit earlier than I expected but was so obviously on the agenda.

Well in all fairness he didn't get a fair shake during his first term with all of the bogus "Russia collusion/Impeachment" nonsense

Eh? He lost the last election came back, won the second one, that's two terms?

Has it changed?

Well the first term shouldn't really count as he was under minded from day one with faux investigations

You really don't believe that...

I think there is some intelligence in there so stop being a dick.

Every president is under some shite from day one

Trump just had more than most

Rules are rules

LOL

Of course I don't believe it

I'm simply sharing the rationale as to why some people would hold that opinion

Idiots hold that view. If you don't want to be thought of one, I'd suggest you don't push their agenda.

[whitey]

See the 3rd term chat has started, a bit earlier than I expected but was so obviously on the agenda.

Well in all fairness he didn't get a fair shake during his first term with all of the bogus "Russia collusion/Impeachment" nonsense

Eh? He lost the last election came back, won the second one, that's two terms?

Has it changed?

Well the first term shouldn't really count as he was under minded from day one with faux investigations

You really don't believe that...

I think there is some intelligence in there so stop being a dick.

Every president is under some shite from day one

Trump just had more than most

Rules are rules

LOL

Of course I don't believe it

I'm simply sharing the rationale as to why some people would hold that opinion

Idiots hold that view. If you don't want to be thought of one, I'd suggest you don't push their agenda.

All views should be considered even the ones you disagree with

[trueblue1234]

See the 3rd term chat has started, a bit earlier than I expected but was so obviously on the agenda.

Well in all fairness he didn't get a fair shake during his first term with all of the bogus "Russia collusion/Impeachment" nonsense

Eh? He lost the last election came back, won the second one, that's two terms?

Has it changed?

Well the first term shouldn't really count as he was under minded from day one with faux investigations

You really don't believe that...

I think there is some intelligence in there so stop being a dick.

Every president is under some shite from day one

Trump just had more than most

Rules are rules

LOL

Of course I don't believe it

I'm simply sharing the rationale as to why some people would hold that opinion

Idiots hold that view. If you don't want to be thought of one, I'd suggest you don't push their agenda.

All views should be considered even the ones you disagree with

The world is flat?

[whitey]

See the 3rd term chat has started, a bit earlier than I expected but was so obviously on the agenda.

Well in all fairness he didn't get a fair shake during his first term with all of the bogus "Russia collusion/Impeachment" nonsense

Eh? He lost the last election came back, won the second one, that's two terms?

Has it changed?

Well the first term shouldn't really count as he was under minded from day one with faux investigations

You really don't believe that...

I think there is some intelligence in there so stop being a dick.

Every president is under some shite from day one

Trump just had more than most

Rules are rules

LOL

Of course I don't believe it

I'm simply sharing the rationale as to why some people would hold that opinion

Idiots hold that view. If you don't want to be thought of one, I'd suggest you don't push their agenda.

All views should be considered even the ones you disagree with

The world is flat?

Gender and race are social constructs

Ask Paul Murphy about it

[trueblue1234]

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

[whitey]

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

I didn't miss anything

Who gets to decide what views are to be considered?

FFS some very well educated and informed people even questioned if Trump should even be allowed on the ballot-should their views have been given consideration?

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/does-the-14th-amendment-bar-donald-trump-from-running-for-president/

[trueblue1234]

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

I didn't miss anything

Who gets to decide what views are to be considered?

FFS some very well educated and informed people even questioned if Trump should even be allowed on the ballot-should their views have been given consideration?

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/does-the-14th-amendment-bar-donald-trump-from-running-for-president/

I decide what I think should be considered. I've no control over yourself. You be you. But as I said, voice the opinion of idiots, and you run the risk of being considered one.

[whitey]

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

I didn't miss anything

Who gets to decide what views are to be considered?

FFS some very well educated and informed people even questioned if Trump should even be allowed on the ballot-should their views have been given consideration?

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/does-the-14th-amendment-bar-donald-trump-from-running-for-president/

I decide what I think should be considered. I've no control over yourself. You be you. But as I said, voice the opinion of idiots, and you run the risk of being considered one.

So are the 51 former intelligence officials who spoke out against the Hunter Biden laptop idiots ?

Should their opinions have been considered?

Should the NY Times/Wa Po/CNN/MSNBC be sanctioned for elevating such politically motivated falsehoods?

[trueblue1234]

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

I didn't miss anything

Who gets to decide what views are to be considered?

FFS some very well educated and informed people even questioned if Trump should even be allowed on the ballot-should their views have been given consideration?

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/does-the-14th-amendment-bar-donald-trump-from-running-for-president/

I decide what I think should be considered. I've no control over yourself. You be you. But as I said, voice the opinion of idiots, and you run the risk of being considered one.

So are the 51 former intelligence officials who spoke out against the Hunter Biden laptop idiots ?

Should their opinions have been considered?

Should the NY Times/Wa Po/CNN/MSNBC be sanctioned for elevating such politically motivated falsehoods?

Why would you think they shouldn't be. Are you putting that view on the same level as someone who thinks Trump should get a third term?

[whitey]

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

I didn't miss anything

Who gets to decide what views are to be considered?

FFS some very well educated and informed people even questioned if Trump should even be allowed on the ballot-should their views have been given consideration?

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/does-the-14th-amendment-bar-donald-trump-from-running-for-president/

I decide what I think should be considered. I've no control over yourself. You be you. But as I said, voice the opinion of idiots, and you run the risk of being considered one.

So are the 51 former intelligence officials who spoke out against the Hunter Biden laptop idiots ?

Should their opinions have been considered?

Should the NY Times/Wa Po/CNN/MSNBC be sanctioned for elevating such politically motivated falsehoods?

Why would you think they shouldn't be. Are you putting that view on the same level as someone who thinks Trump should get a third term?

So lies and unproven half tr

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

I didn't miss anything

Who gets to decide what views are to be considered?

FFS some very well educated and informed people even questioned if Trump should even be allowed on the ballot-should their views have been given consideration?

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/does-the-14th-amendment-bar-donald-trump-from-running-for-president/

I decide what I think should be considered. I've no control over yourself. You be you. But as I said, voice the opinion of idiots, and you run the risk of being considered one.

So are the 51 former intelligence officials who spoke out against the Hunter Biden laptop idiots ?

Should their opinions have been considered?

Should the NY Times/Wa Po/CNN/MSNBC be sanctioned for elevating such politically motivated falsehoods?

Why would you think they shouldn't be. Are you putting that view on the same level as someone who thinks Trump should get a third term?

uths

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

I didn't miss anything

Who gets to decide what views are to be considered?

FFS some very well educated and informed people even questioned if Trump should even be allowed on the ballot-should their views have been given consideration?

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/does-the-14th-amendment-bar-donald-trump-from-running-for-president/

I decide what I think should be considered. I've no control over yourself. You be you. But as I said, voice the opinion of idiots, and you run the risk of being considered one.

So are the 51 former intelligence officials who spoke out against the Hunter Biden laptop idiots ?

Should their opinions have been considered?

Should the NY Times/Wa Po/CNN/MSNBC be sanctioned for elevating such politically motivated falsehoods?

Why would you think they shouldn't be. Are you putting that view on the same level as someone who thinks Trump should get a third term?

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

I didn't miss anything

Who gets to decide what views are to be considered?

FFS some very well educated and informed people even questioned if Trump should even be allowed on the ballot-should their views have been given consideration?

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/does-the-14th-amendment-bar-donald-trump-from-running-for-president/

I decide what I think should be considered. I've no control over yourself. You be you. But as I said, voice the opinion of idiots, and you run the risk of being considered one.

So are the 51 former intelligence officials who spoke out against the Hunter Biden laptop idiots ?

Should their opinions have been considered?

Should the NY Times/Wa Po/CNN/MSNBC be sanctioned for elevating such politically motivated falsehoods?

Why would you think they shouldn't be. Are you putting that view on the same level as someone who thinks Trump should get a third term?

100%

Lies and half truths that were designed to sway en entire electorate just before an election were just as (and probably more) destructive to democracy as a c**k a mamie scheme promoting a scheme that would allow Trump serve a third term

[trueblue1234]

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

I didn't miss anything

Who gets to decide what views are to be considered?

FFS some very well educated and informed people even questioned if Trump should even be allowed on the ballot-should their views have been given consideration?

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/does-the-14th-amendment-bar-donald-trump-from-running-for-president/

I decide what I think should be considered. I've no control over yourself. You be you. But as I said, voice the opinion of idiots, and you run the risk of being considered one.

So are the 51 former intelligence officials who spoke out against the Hunter Biden laptop idiots ?

Should their opinions have been considered?

Should the NY Times/Wa Po/CNN/MSNBC be sanctioned for elevating such politically motivated falsehoods?

Why would you think they shouldn't be. Are you putting that view on the same level as someone who thinks Trump should get a third term?

So lies and unproven half tr

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

I didn't miss anything

Who gets to decide what views are to be considered?

FFS some very well educated and informed people even questioned if Trump should even be allowed on the ballot-should their views have been given consideration?

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/does-the-14th-amendment-bar-donald-trump-from-running-for-president/

I decide what I think should be considered. I've no control over yourself. You be you. But as I said, voice the opinion of idiots, and you run the risk of being considered one.

So are the 51 former intelligence officials who spoke out against the Hunter Biden laptop idiots ?

Should their opinions have been considered?

Should the NY Times/Wa Po/CNN/MSNBC be sanctioned for elevating such politically motivated falsehoods?

Why would you think they shouldn't be. Are you putting that view on the same level as someone who thinks Trump should get a third term?

uths

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

I didn't miss anything

Who gets to decide what views are to be considered?

FFS some very well educated and informed people even questioned if Trump should even be allowed on the ballot-should their views have been given consideration?

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/does-the-14th-amendment-bar-donald-trump-from-running-for-president/

I decide what I think should be considered. I've no control over yourself. You be you. But as I said, voice the opinion of idiots, and you run the risk of being considered one.

So are the 51 former intelligence officials who spoke out against the Hunter Biden laptop idiots ?

Should their opinions have been considered?

Should the NY Times/Wa Po/CNN/MSNBC be sanctioned for elevating such politically motivated falsehoods?

Why would you think they shouldn't be. Are you putting that view on the same level as someone who thinks Trump should get a third term?

You seem to have missed my point that some views should not be equally considered.

I didn't miss anything

Who gets to decide what views are to be considered?

FFS some very well educated and informed people even questioned if Trump should even be allowed on the ballot-should their views have been given consideration?

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/does-the-14th-amendment-bar-donald-trump-from-running-for-president/

I decide what I think should be considered. I've no control over yourself. You be you. But as I said, voice the opinion of idiots, and you run the risk of being considered one.

So are the 51 former intelligence officials who spoke out against the Hunter Biden laptop idiots ?

Should their opinions have been considered?

Should the NY Times/Wa Po/CNN/MSNBC be sanctioned for elevating such politically motivated falsehoods?

Why would you think they shouldn't be. Are you putting that view on the same level as someone who thinks Trump should get a third term?

100%

Lies and half truths that were designed to sway en entire electorate just before an election were just as (and probably more) destructive to democracy as a c**k a mamie scheme promoting a scheme that would allow Trump serve a third term

As I said. You be you. Claiming a third term for Trump isn't half truths. It's just bollix. And most people know that.

[whitey]

Claiming that Trump was colluding with Russia (or Claiming the Hunter Biden Laptop was Russian Disinformation) isn't half truths. It's just bollix. And most people know that

[trueblue1234]

We'll agree to disagree.

[Milltown Row2]

Claiming that Trump was colluding with Russia (or Claiming the Hunter Biden Laptop was Russian Disinformation) isn't half truths. It's just bollix. And most people know that

You really don't believe half the shite you post, impossible, I'm a contrary Cnut but you take the biscuit

[whitey]

Claiming that Trump was colluding with Russia (or Claiming the Hunter Biden Laptop was Russian Disinformation) isn't half truths. It's just bollix. And most people know that

You really don't believe half the shite you post, impossible, I'm a contrary Cnut but you take the biscuit

The amount of absolute manure posted on here is mind boggling-but unfortunately it's taken as gospel by many if it comes from a "respected" source.

I just post manure but from the other side of the aisle.....but my manure is false while theirs is stone cold fact-LOL

I was in Ireland last June and was talking to a fella I know (first class degree in Engineering from UCG) and the $hite he was coming out with was simply amazing....all from CNN and similar sources

Anything I told him was just a "right wing talking point".

It was the week of the debate and He was absolutely shocked and incredulous when I told him that people in the administration were covering for Joe....no way....sure didn't he saw him down in Ballina the year before and he was simply inspirational