ICTU have called a National Strike over the economy. Do you support it?

Started by Silky, February 25, 2009, 10:16:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Do you support the National Strike?

Yes
10 (17.5%)
No
47 (82.5%)

Total Members Voted: 57

Silky


Bogball XV

Tis great to see such imaginative thinking from those who would lead us.

Silky

I don't want to lead anybody!! I'm just asking a question on support for the national strike. I'll reveil my own views later.

Bogball XV

Quote from: Silky on February 25, 2009, 10:31:09 AM
I don't want to lead anybody!! I'm just asking a question on support for the national strike. I'll reveil my own views later.
I wasn't accusing you of any such thing - touchy....

Gnevin

ICTU's solution to the greatest economic crises since the 30's ? Carry on like it's not happening and when you don't get your pay increase, strike. Well we will be out of this recession in no time so.
Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling.


FermGael

Wanted.  Forwards to take frees.
Not fussy.  Any sort of ability will be considered

Gnevin

Quote from: FermGael on February 25, 2009, 10:55:46 AM
I understand the reasoning behind it but the timing is brutal.



What reasoning? They walked out of the talks expecting to be begged back in?
Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling.

tyronefan

how is a strike going to solve anything  surely it will only make things worse

FermGael

Quote from: Gnevin on February 25, 2009, 10:59:40 AM
Quote from: FermGael on February 25, 2009, 10:55:46 AM
I understand the reasoning behind it but the timing is brutal.



What reasoning? They walked out of the talks expecting to be begged back in?

I think the Unions would have stayed in if there would have been a notion that this deal would have been equal an all parts of society.
It's not.
Wanted.  Forwards to take frees.
Not fussy.  Any sort of ability will be considered

tyronefan

I know  the private sector  is getting hit a hell of a lot harder

FermGael

Quote from: tyronefan on February 25, 2009, 11:12:10 AM
I know  the private sector  is getting hit a hell of a lot harder

I agree with you TyroneFan.
Its the very wealthy and rich that seem to be getting off scot free
Wanted.  Forwards to take frees.
Not fussy.  Any sort of ability will be considered

Gnevin

Quote from: FermGael on February 25, 2009, 11:08:23 AM
Quote from: Gnevin on February 25, 2009, 10:59:40 AM
Quote from: FermGael on February 25, 2009, 10:55:46 AM
I understand the reasoning behind it but the timing is brutal.



What reasoning? They walked out of the talks expecting to be begged back in?

I think the Unions would have stayed in if there would have been a notion that this deal would have been equal an all parts of society.
It's not.

Fact 1 : The Government needed to save 2 bl.
Fact 2 : The unions would of been aware of the levy the Government where proposing .
Fact 3 : The unions would not accept the levy .

Now the unions could of stayed in the talks, and argued for a lower paid exemption , with a higher tax on the better paid or proposed something else but all I am hearing for the unions is yes we need to save money, yes we need cut backs but once they don't hit my members .

Economic Nimby-ism at it's finest.
Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling.

Gnevin

Quote from: FermGael on February 25, 2009, 11:13:31 AM
Quote from: tyronefan on February 25, 2009, 11:12:10 AM
I know  the private sector  is getting hit a hell of a lot harder

I agree with you TyroneFan.
Its the very wealthy and rich that seem to be getting off scot free
Would you propose we do about it then?
Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling.

FermGael

get the IMF in quickly.
There will be a queue very soon as its best to get in before the rush
Wanted.  Forwards to take frees.
Not fussy.  Any sort of ability will be considered