Suck-up Bono

[Gnevin]

Fair enough then, we just have a different stance on how it's reported.
There is no doubt in my mind that it is happening but just haven't quite read
anything solid enough to convince me that it's solely mans fault and that it may
be nothing more than a natural phenomenon, we've been here before...
The scientific findings for both arguments are equally as strong depending on the
scientist' interpretation of the findings IMO.

I don't think anyone is saying its us alone but we are greatly , greatly adding to it

[Seamus]

Far more scientists have proven that global warming has nothing to do with man. The controlled media will not give them any coverage. The ones that have are all bought mouth pieces. In the eighties we were told that another ice age was at our door step, now the big u-turn. This is all about control and the introduction of a global taxation to correct the (non) problem. Sure lets all agree to the tax and we will be saved. Gore does not practice what he preaches, he is an utter hypocrite. Throw in Bono as well. This follows his fight to save Africa from AIDS when in fact he was doing the very opposite. Still the majority of people cannot see through their facade. Bono is either very stupid or another Globalist junkie. I believe it's the latter. In time he will be found out for what he really stands for, an Agenda 21 profiteer among other things.

[J70]

Far more scientists have proven that global warming has nothing to do with man. The controlled media will not give them any coverage. The ones that have are all bought mouth pieces.

Is that a fact? Please elaborate.

[his holiness nb]

Far more scientists have proven that global warming has nothing to do with man.

I knew that captain planet f**ker was full of shit! 

[tyssam5]

"Far more scientists have proven that global warming has nothing to do with man"

Question for Seamus: Do you have a scientific background?

[Seamus]

Far more scientists have proven that global warming has nothing to do with man. The controlled media will not give them any coverage. The ones that have are all bought mouth pieces.

Is that a fact? Please elaborate.

J70, is the Federal Government of the United States of America capable of lying to us? If you think not then there is no need for further research as they will give you all the info you need. On the other hand if you believe they are capable you will have to seek the truth elsewhere.  What Al Gore, NASA and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are telling us about Global Warming is a little science and a large part science fiction.

One of the better places to start you truth search:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=1439

[Seamus]

"Far more scientists have proven that global warming has nothing to do with man"

Question for Seamus: Do you have a scientific background?

tyssam maybe the apt question should read: Does Al Gore and Bono have a scientific background?

[Gnevin]

"Far more scientists have proven that global warming has nothing to do with man"

Question for Seamus: Do you have a scientific background?

tyssam maybe the apt question should read: Does Al Gore and Bono have a scientific background?

Read this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Statements_by_dissenting_organizations

[J70]

Far more scientists have proven that global warming has nothing to do with man. The controlled media will not give them any coverage. The ones that have are all bought mouth pieces.

Is that a fact? Please elaborate.

J70, is the Federal Government of the United States of America capable of lying to us? If you think not then there is no need for further research as they will give you all the info you need. On the other hand if you believe they are capable, you will have to seek the truth elsewhere.  What Al Gore, NASA and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are telling us about Global Warming is a little science and a large part science fiction.

You can start with the link below to see the other side of the story. I hope I'm incorrect with the feeling that you have your mind made up already thus rendering the link pointless.

http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn11462

Although I'm far from an expert on climate, I'm well educated in the sciences and thus well aware that everything is subject to ongoing revision and qualification in the light of new data. However, I've a rather jaundiced view of what is promoted by anti-government right wingers, given their appalling record of misrepresentation and distortion with regards to the sciences I do know a bit about. That doesn't mean they're always wrong, but I would have more questions about their motives. I'm not saying that New Scientist belong to that group however, and I'll certainly look at what they've got to say.