Messages

1

General discussion / Re: Sinn Fein? They have gone away, you know.

« on: September 14, 2018, 08:23:24 AM »

fair enough

Any plans to delete the post?

Yes.

It’s not the first time this particular repressed homosexual has endorsed rape or tried to deflect his position by blaming the victim of such heinous crimes. If you aren’t comfortable in your own sexuality Mr Orior then maybe you should stay firmly in that closet, just off Sunnyside St. You could always try getting on the other bus or wearing comfortable shoes, you old friend of Frankie

I wonder could master Ambrose explain his theory on this cracker?

2

General discussion / Re: Sinn Fein? They have gone away, you know.

« on: September 13, 2018, 11:24:59 PM »

fair enough

3

General discussion / Re: Sinn Fein? They have gone away, you know.

« on: September 13, 2018, 11:15:23 PM »

totally, disagree. it was this one particular individual. but i have retracted.

4

General discussion / Re: Sinn Fein? They have gone away, you know.

« on: September 13, 2018, 10:15:58 PM »

Fair enough, I'm not endorsing rape, and she is a victim and has indeed every right to voice her opinion.

So I will retract.

5

General discussion / Re: Sinn Fein? They have gone away, you know.

« on: September 13, 2018, 06:45:51 PM »

No she did not. But there is a camera

6

General discussion / Re: The OFFICIAL FAI Thread.....Roll on France 2016

« on: September 11, 2018, 07:05:29 PM »

Good old Roy Keane. A hero for every bully, or those aspiring to be a bully.

7

General discussion / Re: Poll: Ken v Mark

« on: September 11, 2018, 04:04:32 PM »

Is that you Mark?

8

General discussion / Re: British State Collusion

« on: September 09, 2018, 02:53:26 PM »

Wouldn't it be better if we ditched the past?

No.

Then let’s start with a victims commissioner for the 1641 Rebellion.

Or are you going to draw the line for what is in scope?

If their loved ones are still hurting, demanding to know the truth and trying to clear their names, I wish them the best of luck.
In relation to Ballymurphy, these families have sat back and watched their loved one’s killers be hailed as heroes, awarded and indeed knighted for their actions in the British military. Meanwhile, those innocents who were murdered in cold blood were vilified as terrorists.
It may be easy for you to “ditch it” but I don’t know where you get off telling these families to “ditch it”.

Okay. Maybe if I said I had a brother killed in the Troubles? If I had two relations killed in the Troubles can I "get off" as you put it?

Everybody has suffered.

No. It is not up to you to tell anyone else when it is time to move on and “ditch the past”.

No I wont tell anyone to ditch the past. Otherwise we would lose out on annual 1690 celebrations, and Remembrance Sunday.

I would also like the british to own up and admit they acted outside the law, but the wont. So we are doomed to live in a stalemate.

9

General discussion / Re: British State Collusion

« on: September 09, 2018, 01:46:54 PM »

Wouldn't it be better if we ditched the past?

No.

Then let’s start with a victims commissioner for the 1641 Rebellion.

Or are you going to draw the line for what is in scope?

If their loved ones are still hurting, demanding to know the truth and trying to clear their names, I wish them the best of luck.
In relation to Ballymurphy, these families have sat back and watched their loved one’s killers be hailed as heroes, awarded and indeed knighted for their actions in the British military. Meanwhile, those innocents who were murdered in cold blood were vilified as terrorists.
It may be easy for you to “ditch it” but I don’t know where you get off telling these families to “ditch it”.

Okay. Maybe if I said I had a brother killed in the Troubles? If I had two relations killed in the Troubles can I "get off" as you put it?

Everybody has suffered.

10

General discussion / Re: British State Collusion

« on: September 09, 2018, 12:01:51 PM »

Wouldn't it be better if we ditched the past?

No.

Then let’s start with a victims commissioner for the 1641 Rebellion.

Or are you going to draw the line for what is in scope?

11

General discussion / Re: The Official Tennis Thread

« on: September 09, 2018, 11:25:50 AM »

Did anyone watch it on Amazon Prime (I think).

Very annoying that it was not on Sky Sports at least.

Anywhere I can watch it now?

12

General discussion / Re: British State Collusion

« on: September 09, 2018, 11:22:16 AM »

Wouldn't it be better if we ditched the past?

13

General discussion / Re: Things that make you go What the F**k?

« on: September 06, 2018, 05:25:30 PM »

British government introducing laws to ban upskirt photos, and at the very same time, Channel 4 showing a programme called Naked Attraction.

One is a blatant invasion of privacy. The other is TV show in which participants engage voluntarily and are aware of the nature of it from the outset.

Strange to find any sort of thread connecting them, never mind one that makes you scratch your head.

Why the need to go to all the effort of upshirt photos when it’s in your face on Channel 4. Capeesh?

14

General discussion / Re: Things that make you go What the F**k?

« on: September 06, 2018, 03:56:42 PM »

British government introducing laws to ban upskirt photos, and at the very same time, Channel 4 showing a programme called Naked Attraction.

15

General discussion / Re: Primark fire in belfast

« on: September 06, 2018, 03:09:37 PM »

I'm into history and shit, and I think it should be flattened asap.