Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - GiveItToTheShooters

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 45
1
General discussion / Re: The Official Tennis Thread
« on: June 12, 2021, 01:34:50 AM »
Sure Nadal is a busted flush

2
General discussion / Re: The Official Golf Thread
« on: June 08, 2021, 12:36:24 PM »
well maybe he should have been vaccinated by now
Having the vaccine doesn’t stop you from getting it. It would’ve made no difference  ;D ;D ;D
Your second sentence is false. .

Getting the vaccine does not guarantee you won’t get Covid, but it hugely reduces the chances. And if you do catch it you’re far less likely to get sick.
I didn’t mention whether he would get sick or not, so my second sentence isn’t false. The vaccine doesn’t stop you getting it which is what I said. So having the vaccine or not, would’ve made no difference.

It's not 100% but the vaccine does stop you getting Covid - or at least hugely reduces the chance of you contracting it and passing it on.

When they say 90% efficacy, that means re contracting Covid. If Rahm had got the vaccine, he would have been highly unlikely to contract Covid.
The vaccine does not stop you getting it. You’ve just proved my point, thank you.

3
General discussion / Re: The Official Golf Thread
« on: June 07, 2021, 05:27:49 PM »
well maybe he should have been vaccinated by now
Having the vaccine doesn’t stop you from getting it. It would’ve made no difference  ;D ;D ;D
Your second sentence is false. .

Getting the vaccine does not guarantee you won’t get Covid, but it hugely reduces the chances. And if you do catch it you’re far less likely to get sick.
I didn’t mention whether he would get sick or not, so my second sentence isn’t false. The vaccine doesn’t stop you getting it which is what I said. So having the vaccine or not, would’ve made no difference.

If he was vaccinated he wouldn’t have been tested as a close contact so it made a huge difference
Another one that can’t read.
Having the vaccine does not stop you getting the virus, and therefore would’ve made no difference.

My point, which I think is pretty clear, is that if Rahm had been vaccinated he wouldn’t have been tested all week by the PGA (it’s part of their protocol). Close contacts aren’t tested……..So he would have been informed he was a close contact but let tear away playing, NO TEST so no positive result and end up winning the tournament. That’s pretty clear isn’t it ???
Yea no problem with that, my point was about him getting the virus, not about having to withdraw.

4
General discussion / Re: The Official Golf Thread
« on: June 07, 2021, 03:58:43 PM »
well maybe he should have been vaccinated by now
Having the vaccine doesn’t stop you from getting it. It would’ve made no difference  ;D ;D ;D
Your second sentence is false. .

Getting the vaccine does not guarantee you won’t get Covid, but it hugely reduces the chances. And if you do catch it you’re far less likely to get sick.
I didn’t mention whether he would get sick or not, so my second sentence isn’t false. The vaccine doesn’t stop you getting it which is what I said. So having the vaccine or not, would’ve made no difference.

If he was vaccinated he wouldn’t have been tested as a close contact so it made a huge difference
Another one that can’t read.
Having the vaccine does not stop you getting the virus, and therefore would’ve made no difference.

5
General discussion / Re: The Official Golf Thread
« on: June 07, 2021, 12:34:50 PM »
well maybe he should have been vaccinated by now
Having the vaccine doesn’t stop you from getting it. It would’ve made no difference  ;D ;D ;D
Your second sentence is false. .

Getting the vaccine does not guarantee you won’t get Covid, but it hugely reduces the chances. And if you do catch it you’re far less likely to get sick.
I didn’t mention whether he would get sick or not, so my second sentence isn’t false. The vaccine doesn’t stop you getting it which is what I said. So having the vaccine or not, would’ve made no difference.

6
General discussion / Re: China Coronavirus
« on: June 06, 2021, 02:11:52 PM »
Kids complaining about not being able to drink on the Dublin streets? Was it ever legal?
Funny you should say that. Belfast crawling with free staters this weekend due to everything still closed down there.

7
General discussion / Re: The Official Golf Thread
« on: June 06, 2021, 02:09:55 PM »
well maybe he should have been vaccinated by now
Having the vaccine doesn’t stop you from getting it. It would’ve made no difference  ;D ;D ;D

8
GAA Discussion / Re: Joe Brolly
« on: June 04, 2021, 10:51:54 PM »
95% of that article is irrelevant to the topic at hand. He’s box office, whether you’re for or against him.

9
General discussion / Re: The official Everton FC Supporters thread
« on: June 01, 2021, 06:43:09 PM »
Spent an absolute fortune and came tenth, then fucked off to Madrid in the space of a couple of hours  ;D
Ohh Everton, we’re all laughing at you.

10
General discussion / Re: European Leagues.
« on: May 30, 2021, 11:31:38 PM »
Dislike both clubs but would rather see Chelsea win it.

Liverpool hold have the distinction of being the only Club in England to win the League, European Cup and League Cup in a season. So for that reason alone I want Chelsea to win.

But not THE treble.  Only Celtic and United from these shores have managed the holy grail
Who says “THE” treble is the treble? United fans?  ;D
Liverpool have won “THE” quintuple in 2001. You don’t get to decide what is “THE” treble and what isn’t.

Intermediate championship
You’d know all about the intermediate championship.

The league cup is the Junior championship
You’ve nothing to back up that statement. But still. You’d know more about a junior championship

11
General discussion / Re: European Leagues.
« on: May 30, 2021, 11:30:34 PM »
It’s simple. Those trophies are a direct result of the preceding trophies won.
The following years super cup and World Cup is dependent on the next CL. It’s not hard to understand. I’d need to draw a picture for you boys.

I think you’d need to draw yourself a picture  ;D
You’d know more about a big loaf

12
General discussion / Re: European Leagues.
« on: May 30, 2021, 09:51:14 PM »
It’s simple. Those trophies are a direct result of the preceding trophies won.
The following years super cup and World Cup is dependent on the next CL. It’s not hard to understand. I’d need to draw a picture for you boys.

13
General discussion / Re: European Leagues.
« on: May 30, 2021, 09:48:50 PM »
Dislike both clubs but would rather see Chelsea win it.

Liverpool hold have the distinction of being the only Club in England to win the League, European Cup and League Cup in a season. So for that reason alone I want Chelsea to win.

But not THE treble.  Only Celtic and United from these shores have managed the holy grail
Who says “THE” treble is the treble? United fans?  ;D
Liverpool have won “THE” quintuple in 2001. You don’t get to decide what is “THE” treble and what isn’t.

Intermediate championship
You’d know all about the intermediate championship.

14
General discussion / Re: European Leagues.
« on: May 30, 2021, 01:52:49 AM »
Liverpool’s five trophies in 2001 was won over 2 seasons, not all in the one season

Uniteds treble was the three most competitive trophies, so that takes precedence over Liverpool’s treble, although it was also impressive.
Wrong.
They were all won from the one season. One trophy win qualified then for the next one.
You are a United fan saying that YOUR treble was the most competitive, but that’s not fact is it.
If anything ours was more “competitive” and ours takes precedence, cos we won 5.
Typical Mancs.

Ach quit with your Manc crap. I’m not into this Love United hate Liverpool bollix.

The 2001 Charity shield and Euro Super Cup were played the following season, so I’d assume they’re counted as part of the 2001/02 season.

The highest/toughest competitions to win for PL teams would be Chsmpions League, PL and FA cup. UEFA Cup would be lower than CL. And League cup lower than FA.

Anyway, I’m not trying to play the “we’re better than you” bollix. That’s just how I’d imagine it’s seen in terms of value
Well that’s what you are, and what you’re doing.
As I said, wrong. They were trophies won that were a direct following on from competitions that needed to be won in order to qualify for that next competition. The date they were played is irrelevant.
That’s YOUR opinion that FA Cup ranks higher than league cup, you would say that, as a manc. And therefore that’s the Mancs version of what is “THE” treble. But it’s not entirely true is it. We won the “THE” quintuple in 2001. You don’t get to decide what Is and what Isn’t.

Jaysus man, you sure are insecure  ;D

I’m a united fan, not a Manc. And unless you’re from Liverpool, you’re not a scouser neither.

I’m not even going to go there where one season ends and one begins. Fact is, Liverpool won 5 that year which I said. And admittedly it was a great run of success.

The FA grant a Europa League spot to FA cup winners. And from next season, the League cup winners get a UEFA Conference place. The Conference is LOWER than the Europa League. Not only that, but for a few years around the new millennium, League cup winners weren’t granted s Euro place, whereas FA cup winners were. So, that says a lot about which is valued higher
Insecure? How?
Quit crying, you’re a Manc.
Right, glad to see you backed out of that one. You’re correct, Liverpool won 5 that season. Glad we cleared that up.
Wrong again. Up until last season, league cup winners qualified for Europe league as well. So yes, it does say a lot about was is valued (equally) as high.

So if Man City win the Champions League next year, that gets added to their list of achievements this season??

They qualified for it by winning the Premier League this year
No, don’t be ridiculous.
The competition starts and is won next season and is a direct result of the league standing the season previous.
Whereas for example the super cup is a result of winning this seasons European cup. It’s not difficult to understand.

15
General discussion / Re: European Leagues.
« on: May 30, 2021, 01:15:05 AM »
Only ever managed top teams with blank chequebooks.
Hopefully people will start coming to terms with the fraud that he is.

And when it comes to big moments when a good manager is needed, he comes up short time and again. The amount of times he has bottled team selections in big games is unreal.

Messi, Iniesta, Xavi didn't cost Barce' a whole lot.
Refer to the part where I said he only ever managed the top teams, those players made Barcelona a top team. Good man.
He hasn’t done what Klopp has done on a nothing budget for example, and bring sleeping giant clubs, or lower clubs, at the time, success.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 45