Quote from: AustinPowers on August 22, 2023, 10:41:10 AM
Last time I heard Greenwood hadn't been convicted of anything . His girlfriend recorded something that put his freedom and career in jeopardy, yet she's now married to him and expecting his child? Call me cynical , but why would she want to stay with him if he's so bad (convicted or not) , and why would he want to stay with her after her recording basically ruined him?
I'm not saying it was right or wrong to keep him , but it seems united bowed down to a few protestors and turfed him out. If his gf seemingly has forgiven him , the courts have clearly not enough evidence to convict him , then why shouldn't United have kept him?
If this was a standard employee of united's they would be gone the same day, but because its someone they see as an asset who affects their balance sheet they were hoping to get the most out of the money they invested in developing his career to date. Really they could not care less about him or his alleged victim.
His partner released the evidence into the public domain, if there is some alternative explanation for what we all saw and heard then surely he would do his upmost to get that out there. He was not convicted as the charges were dropped, the Crown Prosecution Service said key witnesses had withdrawn and new material had come to light, meaning there was "no longer a realistic prospect of conviction".
I wonder what charities who deal regularly with domestic abuse or the police force would say about a victim withdrawing a statement against their abuser. I would imagine its extremely common and hence why people are not so quick to let Greenwood or United sweep it away and move on.