Quote from: dublin7 on January 26, 2021, 01:56:48 PMQuote from: GetOverTheBar on January 26, 2021, 01:42:38 PM
The King of Sweden is a ceremonial role. He has little to no power. For him to say it was a failure, may be true....but he also faces no backlash, as a result he is probably a kind face to deliver bad news.
With regards to Sweden, we've all seen multiple graphs on them by people with various agendas either for, or against their model. The Swedes have suffered 11k deaths on their policy of keeping everything open....11k is still 11k.
A quick search shows us they have 10.23 million, they have 11,005 deaths and total 547k cases.
Basic numbers, they look to have fatality rate of 0.1%. Not really a massive failure on this. But again, 11k deaths, is 11k deaths which were directly responsible to their policy and as a result can only be labelled a failure.
Sweden seems to follow the "popular" trend of this thing taking out about 0.1% of known cases. Would that be accurate?
Swedn has seen more cases/deaths than any of their nordic neighbours. Depending on which nordic country you compare sweden to their deaths per million of population was between 4.5 and 10 times higher.
I've no dog in the fight with Sweden to be honest, I just am bringing in the political significance of their King stating it was a failure. Looks like he done a turn for the Government with that.
Of course, by nature of staying open their numbers will be bigger, they are a bigger country with more cities especially....But if you didn't know Sweden kept it open, you wouldn't exactly be screaming monsters....complete failures either. Their figures are relatively "acceptable" I would say, considering.