Quote from: pintsofguinness on October 20, 2008, 07:36:31 PMQuoteThe union have suggested a series of plans tailored to meet his needs but patricia lewesly claims it 'villifies' the pupil.His needs? He needs a boot up the hole.
This is the whole problem in society, all this "god love the little rascal" bullshit makes my blood boil. Kick the wee c**t outof the school, let his parents deal with him - it will probably be news to his parents taht it's not teachers who should be bringing up their child though- and let everyone else get on with it.
Next thing he'll have some attention deficit disorder or some other bullshit.
I think you got it in one here.
Disruptive pupils very often come from disruptive homes. In rare cases, this might not be the case but nine times out of ten it is.
If parents were little f**kers themselves, you can't expect anything different from their kids. As regards the legal end, there is probably little or no difference between the situations here in the south and what seems to be the case up north.
Our government is running scared of its constitutional obligation to provide schooling for all children up to the legal leaving age of 15.
Because this is the main priority, little or no attention is paid to the problems parents, teachers or boards of management face on a daily basis and those three groups are hardly likely to protest at the same time or to demand that their rights and those of the innocent kids involved be respected.
It is impossible to expel a pupil in the Republic. A school can get rid of one okay- provided it can come up with a suitable facility in the area willing to take him or her in. Even at that, parental consent has to be obtained.
Given that parental attitudes are usually at the root of the problem, that doesn't happen very often!
The situation changes, once a kid passes his or her 15th birthday. For one thing, backup in the form of counselling services and home visits drops away and the messers can be expelled.
Up until their constitutional rights to an education has ended, those trouble makers can do much as they please because our government is unwilling to spend the money needed to provide extracurricular facilities for them.
The tragedy is that one or two uncontrollable kids can disrupt the work of the whole school and put the safety and best interests of all other pupils at risk. I've seen enough of this codology down here to say it's a total farce and ties up a huge amount of teaching and supervision resources.
Janey! When there was more money in the kitty in recent times, schools down here had an overdose of child psychologists and social workers, not to mention counselling consultants, hopping up all over the place. None of them did a blessed bit of good and very few teachers were sorry to see them withdrawn. Absolutely nothing was done to stand up to aggressive pupils or their parents.
I feel the situation is much the same up north.