Have we all been misdirecting ourselves in this discussion to an extent.
Surely the point of responsibility lies with the senior official (and custodian of the regulations, ultimately) who appears to direct all parties in a few moments on the pitch as to what happens next. Who, in fairness, given the context - on the pitch, an expectant crowd, Jerome's camera rolling - could or would argue ad infinitum.
Now, given that the official, allegedly, has given an incorrect reading of the regulations on the day, it falls to the competition organisers to review this episode and rule.
Neither club are going to gain from this and indeed it is quite unfair that the spotlight has swung around onto them.
Surely the point of responsibility lies with the senior official (and custodian of the regulations, ultimately) who appears to direct all parties in a few moments on the pitch as to what happens next. Who, in fairness, given the context - on the pitch, an expectant crowd, Jerome's camera rolling - could or would argue ad infinitum.
Now, given that the official, allegedly, has given an incorrect reading of the regulations on the day, it falls to the competition organisers to review this episode and rule.
Neither club are going to gain from this and indeed it is quite unfair that the spotlight has swung around onto them.