Surprised no mention, been all over the papers all week
Indo - 25.07.07
Rovers lay down stadium marker
By Daniel McDonnell
Wednesday July 25 2007
SHAMROCK ROVERS have challenged GAA club Thomas Davis to prove they genuinely want them in Tallaght by supporting plans to install temporary structures at the derelict stadium which would allow the Hoops move in next March.
The project is currently stalled as a result of Thomas Davis being successful into securing a judicial review into the classification of the ground as a soccer-only stadium for Rovers.
Instead, with the backing of the Dublin County Board, they are fighting for the venue to be turned into a municipal venue which can be used for GAA fixtures on the southside, albeit with Rovers as the principal tenant. This would require the extension of the playing area and other modifications to the initial plans.
The judicial review process has already stalled any movement for over a year and with no hearing scheduled until October, frustrated Rovers have devised plans to work around the current situation.
They involve finishing maintenance work on the stadium, completing the main stand and introducing temporary stands to bring the ground up to standard in time for the start of next year's Eircom League season - even if the legal battle is still ongoing at that point.
Currently, they are waiting on a response from South Dublin County Council (SDCC) and the government regarding the proposal with FAI chief executive John Delaney meeting the SDCC on Rovers' behalf with the hope of getting the financial go-ahead. As it stands, maintenance of the partially completed stadium is costing the council €13,000 a month.
Crucially, Rovers have sought legal advice to ensure that the temporary modifications to the stadium will not impact upon the outcome of the High Court proceedings.
"It will cater for an extended playing pitch if the court decides that way," says Rovers director James Nolan.
"We've met with Thomas Davis and while we didn't put this direct proposal to them, we did outline our intentions and in principle they had no great objection to it.
"We're pumping a lot of money into the Tallaght area with our scholarships in the IT and projects in the local schools. Now we want to get our senior team out there to join the rest of the club."
The parties met on May 15 and after that meeting Rovers sent a letter to Thomas Davis with a list of points that arose from their discussions.
While disagreements still remain as regards the logistics of a shared playing area and stadium design, Rovers now feel that their stopgap plan will reveal if Thomas Davis are genuine in their assertion that they have no problem with the Hoops' arrival.
With Thomas Davis officials previously expressing concerns that the youth of Tallaght might be restricted to a 'diet of association football' if Rovers came to the area, the suspicion within soccer circles is that the continual delay in finishing the stadium is in the interests of the GAA club.
"We don't know how they're going to react to this," admits Nolan. "There's a potential they could take out a High Court injunction against it.
"The legal opinion we have is that because the plans are in the perimeters of what the High Court has laid out then, hopefully, they wouldn't be successful with an injunction.
"If they were to take out an injunction than that would really show to the general public that they don't want us playing there. If they really truly have no problem with us playing there, they'd be behind the plan 100 per cent as well.
"Everything else has been complex; the key to this is its simplicity. It's time Shamrock Rovers took the bull by the horns on this and that's what we're doing."
Irish Times - 25.07.07
Rovers aiming to start work again on Tallaght Stadium
Paul O'Hehir
Wednesday July 25 2007
Shamrock Rovers could be playing in their new home by the start of next season if proposals to allow work to restart on the Tallaght Stadium get the go-ahead.
South Dublin County Council (SDCC) are considering an FAI-backed initiative by the club that could see builders return to the idle site at Whitestown Way.
Rovers believe their proposals will not prejudice High Court proceedings after the Tallaght-based Thomas Davis GAA club challenged a decision to develop the council-funded stadium for the playing of soccer only.
Rovers - the intended anchor tenants - maintain they are "completely open" to other sports being played at the stadium and believe some work can be carried out to open the ground during the time the court case, which is scheduled for October, runs its course.
The club insists these works, once completed, can accommodate any alterations that may be required in the event of Gaelic games being granted access to the stadium. "Once we heard there was leave for application for the judicial review we looked into how we could work within the parameters of the High Court ruling and try to get into the stadium as soon as possible," club director James Nolan said.
FAI chief executive John Delaney recently put the proposals to SDCC on the club's behalf. Rovers' directors will meet council officials later this week when an outcome could be given. These proposals focus on the completion of the existing - but only partially constructed - main stand and the addition of temporary seating.
Rovers are confident the erection of such seats would not be in breach of the terms stipulated by Mr Justice O'Neill when awarding the judicial review.
The main stand, left idle for years owing to previous financial difficulties at the club, has no roof, no seats and internal structures are incomplete. However, Rovers maintain its location and layout does not require alteration to facilitate Gaelic games, should the need arise.
"This is a simple plan," said Nolan. "We'll finish the main stand structure but not put the wraparounds at the ends. We will also finish auxiliary works around the outside of the stadium and put temporary stands on three sides of the ground.
"It is costing the council roughly €13,000 per month to maintain the stadium in its current state. We want to get into a working facility straight away."
Some 3,000 supporters would be facilitated in the main stand with another 4,000 divided between the temporary structures. Similar temporary seating is being used by Bray Wanderers at the Carlisle Grounds.
While Thomas Davis are entitled to seek a court injunction against the Shamrock Rovers proposal, to do so would "really show them up", Nolan believes. "That would prove to the general public Thomas Davis don't want us playing there. If really and truly they had no problem with us playing in Tallaght they would be behind this plan 100 per cent."
A Rovers delegation met Thomas Davis officials in May when the soccer club expressed a desire to play in Tallaght next season. According to Nolan, "they (Thomas Davis) had no great objection to it".
A spokesman for Thomas Davis could not be contacted last evening. Rovers will undertake structural surveys of the site and seek further legal advice prior to work restarting should SDCC give the go-ahead this week.
The club is also awaiting the thoughts of new Minister for Sport Seamus Brennan. His predecessor, John O'Donoghue, had vigorously supported Rovers in their fight for relocation.
Local Fianna Fail TD Charlie O'Connor is "satisfied and confident the (new) Minister will want to see this issue through". "It is time this was solved," he said. "There is a big, big bank of support for Shamrock Rovers in Tallaght . . . and a strong view that this issue should be put to bed
Quote"it's time Shamrock Rovers took the bull by the horns on this and that's what we're doing."
It certainly is time, how many years sitting on their arses leaving the unfinished project to rot?
Pity to have the ground unused because of the court case.
So now Dublinfella you can use "We" in reference to your connection with Rovers and not to be too embarrased by it and not have to feel that you have to masquerade as a GAA fella. You were feckin hopeless at it anyway.
I see that Rovers spokesperson still thinks there are gaa boggers under his bed ready with their masterplan to wipe soccer out of existance.
Quote from: Main Street on July 25, 2007, 11:52:02 PM
I see that Rovers spokesperson still thinks there are gaa boggers under his bed ready with their masterplan to wipe soccer out of existance.
where does he say that?
Oh christ here we go again, and already recycling the same old arguments! ::)
Its the same bullshit, there is no way TD will let them away with that. And i don't see why people think it is TD that are costing the taxpayer €13k, the government know that appeal was comin but for some reason dug their heels in.
they probably have a few security guards wokring there to stop the local commanches from robbing the concrete
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 11:39:15 AM
Rovers are refusing THE GAA'S OFFER OF A FREE GROUND? that is one of the most bizarre things i have ever read. the gaa havent offered to put one cent into the stadiums redisign. you are going to have to explain that one to me.
If TD object, they cant continue with the line they want the stadium completed asap and shared with Rovers. this plan in no way prejudices they actual outcome of the case and underage GAA can be played on it early next year.
Dublin GAA offered to put 12 million into helping you bigots build your poxy ground and you's said no. Now your in the shits you can stew in it , sure this mess is entirely of your own making.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/newspapers/sunday_times/ireland/article1179410.ece
QuoteOne Rovers director tore up a copy of the proposed agreement. Another said the GAA's terms were "shit" and demanded Maguire's resignation.
This is from lads who where without a ground for over 15 years at this stage , yet they still decided to cut off their nose to spite their faces
Quote from: Gnevin on July 26, 2007, 11:52:44 AM
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 11:39:15 AM
Rovers are refusing THE GAA'S OFFER OF A FREE GROUND? that is one of the most bizarre things i have ever read. the gaa havent offered to put one cent into the stadiums redisign. you are going to have to explain that one to me.
If TD object, they cant continue with the line they want the stadium completed asap and shared with Rovers. this plan in no way prejudices they actual outcome of the case and underage GAA can be played on it early next year.
Dublin GAA offered to put 12 million into helping you bigots build your poxy ground and you's said no. Now your in the shits you can stew in it , sure this mess is entirely of your own making.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/newspapers/sunday_times/ireland/article1179410.ece
QuoteOne Rovers director tore up a copy of the proposed agreement. Another said the GAA's terms were "shit" and demanded Maguire's resignation.
This is from lads who where without a ground for over 15 years at this stage , yet they still decided to cut off their nose to spite their faces
The GAA approach Rovers with a commercial proposition. Rovers say no.
They chose another route to finish it, the GAA injunct. Now the GAA want in for free.
Hardly engenders confidence within soccer circles that the GAA are on the level here....
Dublinfella - aren't you the lad who's been touting the lie here, ad nauseam, that the GAA/Thomas Davis were looking for free use of the stadium and never offered a penny towards this project?
Dublinfella has spun a few fibs on here Hardy.
First he was caught out pretending to be a GAA fan, which he no longer claims btw, and just this morning in a discussion about RTE not showing the christy ring cup matches he claims to have played in the GAA ground in Tullamore.
Who for, Rovers 3rd team? :o
Note during this debate he proved not be interested in the issue at all more so to have a few random pot shots at the GAA.
Another 65 pages of lies from Shamsfella coming up?
Shamrock rovers plans for Stadium - HAHAHAHAHA
Sit on their hands f or 7 years and wait for a daft Council and lily livered Minister to spend € 14 m of our money on providing the miserable b*******s with a free Stadium after paying them €1.5m to get a lease back that should not have been given in the first place till the thing was built.
God give me patience with Soccer beggars. They are well named by the OW"c"ers. :D
Quote from: Star Spangler on July 26, 2007, 01:34:29 PM
Just looking at that photo you'd have to wonder where the Council's 13K a month on "maintenance" is going. The place badly needs a bit of GAA efficiency brought to bear.
Well the grass looks neat, maybe the government negotiated the lawn mowing contract for them :D
I dont think its interesting, I think its very predictable.
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 02:38:04 PM
no-one here is interested in a tangible plan to have soccer and underage GAA played there in months, which to me sums up the real motives amongst sections of this association who seem to still think its 1952. a sad indictment
Dublinfella, they think its 1952 for wanting to play adult football there?
Cop on the f**k ::)
Guys this is example of the mentality of the people we are argueing with..
copied and pasted from the Rovers Ultras website.
"bonhoff" discusses Kennedy...
"can we not just go round his house and break his legs
I'm gettin a pain in me hole with this creature"
"kalsruhe hoop" discusses Kennedy....
"Why would anyone trust this sly f**ker, who has repeatedly abused the legal system in order to have everything held up as long as possible?"
"miltown roader" re Kennedy and TD.....
"How can the bigots wriggle themselves out of this one?"
"green blood" re the GAA......
"its not the commerciual thing, its the professional thing, which is pathetic, we're giving these players JOBs, the GAA gives their players broken jaws"
"karlsruhe hoop" on US at GAABOARD!!!!!
"Most people on the GAA forums are woefully misinformed, biased and blinkered - because they CHOOSE TO BE.
They simply don't want to know the reality regarding the stadium and Rovers, because it doesn't suit their selfish, overbearing fascist stance"
"hooperama" on US at GAABOARD!!!!!
"Spot on. Ignorance is bliss as far as they are concerned. Wouldn't even bat an eyelid at their nazi forums"
"buzz" on TD and Kennedy...
"its great that thomas davis bigots are being shown up for the infantile out of date, greedy bigot scum they are.. yes mr david kennedy kpmg that you we mean"
"hectorgray" on TD.....
"When is the next court date with the biggots?"
They really are the lowest kind of lifeforms.
Thanks god at least they are soccer fans, the last thing we need is to attract this sort of scum to Dublin games.
theres no point in discussing this with DublinFella as he wont listen. the whole thing would be sorted if Rovers agree that the stadium is made bigger and they say to the minister that everything is ok. I love the way rovers gon on about their 120year lease but have no money to build a stadium of their own. the only reason i want the gaa in thereis because its going for free, it rovers were building it i would not have an issue!
Quote from: Tankie on July 26, 2007, 03:15:56 PM
theres no point in discussing this with DublinFella as he wont listen. the whole thing would be sorted if Rovers agree that the stadium is made bigger and they say to the minister that everything is ok. I love the way rovers gon on about their 120year lease but have no money to build a stadium of their own. the only reason i want the gaa in thereis because its going for free, it rovers were building it i would not have an issue!
round and round in circles we go. Even Thomas Davis arent claiming its a free stadium Rovers are getting.
How did this line get creedance?
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 03:21:17 PM
round and round in circles we go.
We never expect anything else once you get going roversfella
:D :D :D
Still claiming to be a GAA fan?
Played in Tullamore my hole.
What I find amusing is that you expect people to take you seriously when you are a proven liar.
Also lets not forget this is the guy who also made excuses for the "thomas davis/gac, f**k off and die" banners shown at a Rovers game.
Nice crowd them, "f**k off and die" on banners, taunting players over their wifes death, classy bunch.
Quote from: his holiness nb on July 26, 2007, 03:25:38 PM
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 03:21:17 PM
round and round in circles we go.
We never expect anything else once you get going roversfella
:D :D :D
Still claiming to be a GAA fan?
Played in Tullamore my hole.
What I find amusing is that you expect people to take you seriously when you are a proven liar.
Also lets not forget this is the guy who also made excuses for the "thomas davis/gac, f**k off and die" banners shown at a Rovers game.
Nice crowd them, "f**k off and die" on banners, taunting players over their wifes death, classy bunch.
it was carlow.
and i never made excuses for the banner, i just commented that people who were indignant about that reaction had no problem whatsoever with the 'last man standing' email. i expect higher standards from an officer of the GAA than a group of soccer fans.
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 03:33:49 PM
and i never made excuses for the banner, i just commented that people who were indignant about that reaction had no problem whatsoever with the 'last man standing' email. i expect higher standards from an officer of the GAA than a group of soccer fans.
Did an official of the GAA say "f**k off and die" to Rovers?
Did an official of the GAA taunt a player over his wifes death?
No, so there you go, you expected higher standards from an official of the GAA than a group of soccer fans and got it.
p.s. you didnt condemn the banner, you said you could understand why they did it. Thats making excuses in anyones book ::)
Quote from: his holiness nb on July 26, 2007, 03:44:50 PM
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 03:33:49 PM
and i never made excuses for the banner, i just commented that people who were indignant about that reaction had no problem whatsoever with the 'last man standing' email. i expect higher standards from an officer of the GAA than a group of soccer fans.
Did an official of the GAA say "f**k off and die" to Rovers?
Did an official of the GAA taunt a player over his wifes death?
No, so there you go, you expected higher standards from an official of the GAA than a group of soccer fans and got it.
p.s. you didnt condemn the banner, you said you could understand why they did it. Thats making excuses in anyones book ::)
an official of the GAA said similar to the first one.
I said that I understood the frustrations of Rovers fans to read Kennedy in the Tallaght Echo claiming that they were behind TD's stance on the stadium and this boiled over. The wording was a disgrace.
Have you any opinion on the latest developments?
1 - did we need another thread to thrash this out.
2 - why debate with someone who has a tenuos grip on reality and a complete inability to tell the difference between facts and what some fella said to my sisters aunties parrot when pissed.
Quote from: magpie seanie on July 26, 2007, 04:12:51 PM
1 - did we need another thread to thrash this out.
2 - why debate with someone who has a tenuos grip on reality and a complete inability to tell the difference between facts and what some fella said to my sisters aunties parrot when pissed.
which one was pissed
the parrot or the fella? ???
:D :D
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 04:00:29 PM
an official of the GAA said similar to the first one.
Have you any opinion on the latest developments?
Care to quote him so we can see how similar to "f**k off and die" it was?
My opinion on the latest developments?
Purely due to my experience of Shamrock Rovers as a club and their fans (helped enormously by the contingent on here and on the Rovers Ultras site) I hope to god that Thomas Davis get their way as I dont believe scum like Rovers and their fans should be given a free (mostly) stadium.
The more sports clubs / teams to benefit from this stadium the better IMO.
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 04:00:29 PM
Have you any opinion on the latest developments?
Using the debate logic of Nolan, Shamrock Rovers spokesperson,
this GAA statement proves to the general public that the GAA want Rovers playing there.
Nolan
"If they were to take out an injunction than that would really show to the general public that they don't want us playing there. If they really truly have no problem with us playing there, they'd be behind the plan 100 per cent as well."
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 02:38:04 PM
I
but what gives rover the right to a free stadium?????????
they have put millions into it and own the land.
[/quot
More absolute lies from this cnut???
They DO NOT own the land - the public throught the local Council owns the land.
Millions of what - they got €1.5 million OUT of it the useless shower of ******s
BEGGARS the lot of them.
Moderators - can this be closed again as there is no need to keep giving this clown space to spout absolute lies non stop and annoy the rest of us in the process.
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 03:33:49 PMand i never made excuses for the banner, i just commented that people who were indignant about that reaction had no problem whatsoever with the 'last man standing' email. i expect higher standards from an officer of the GAA than a group of soccer fans.
If u were a GAA man (as u claim to be ad nauseum, Jaysus, even the Paisleys couldn't keep this lie up) u would realise that the meaning of "last man standing" refers to the history of the GAA, from togging out in ditches, playing in rented fields, club lottos, running fundraisers, planning, development, etc, which has brought us to the strong position where we are today. Compare that to the mismanagement of Shamble Rovers down through the years, no ground, no money, selling themselves down the river, etc. What ur man meant was that if it came down to a battle of wills between TD and Shamble Rovers he'd have every confidence based on history, tradition and willpower that TD would emerge victorious. Even though it'd be a 2 horse race it'd be like the donkey from Shrek trying to take on Seabiscuit and as Babs Keating (Tipperary hurling manager) once said "Donkeys don't win Derbies". Nothing sinister in "last man standing", no matter what slant yous try and put on it. Now away back to ur wannabe hooligan board.
TF only want what's right and fair, equal access to the stadium.
Incidentally the fact that this guy is allowed spout his rubbish says a lot about tolerance in gaa circles compared to his own rovers ultras site.
I joined months back and asked (deliberatly politely) why they have it in for the gaa so much.
I was banned immediately.
Bigotry doesnt come close to it, they are real brit holligan wannabees.
so an interesting and positive compromise between all sides in the saga cannot be discussed because a few heads on this board couldnt be arsed.
the irony of abusing the rovers mb for being whatever with the vitriol that has been used here is lost on most of the backwoodsmen sprouting the predicitble garbage.
its a sad reflection on some of the membership of the gaa when kennedy in TD is more reasonable than the keyboard hardmen here.
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 04:49:34 PM
backwoodsmen sprouting the predicitble garbage.
Stop constantly telling deliberate falsehoods on this board and people might take you a bit more seriously. >:(
I love the use of the term "backwoodsmen" - it's usually used by soccerites to describe GAA people who dont think soccer is wonderful. ;)
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 04:49:34 PM
so an interesting and positive compromise between all sides in the saga cannot be discussed because a few heads on this board couldnt be arsed.
the irony of abusing the rovers mb for being whatever with the vitriol that has been used here is lost on most of the backwoodsmen sprouting the predicitble garbage.
its a sad reflection on some of the membership of the gaa when kennedy in TD is more reasonable than the keyboard hardmen here.
Keyboard hardmen???
Jesus check your own site pal.
Oh yeah what else was I told on there,, "I hope you get Mark Fowler disease"
But of course nothing compared to what goes on here ::)
You are a pathetic bigot
Quote from: his holiness nb on July 26, 2007, 04:59:57 PM
Quote from: dublinfella on July 26, 2007, 04:49:34 PM
so an interesting and positive compromise between all sides in the saga cannot be discussed because a few heads on this board couldnt be arsed.
the irony of abusing the rovers mb for being whatever with the vitriol that has been used here is lost on most of the backwoodsmen sprouting the predicitble garbage.
its a sad reflection on some of the membership of the gaa when kennedy in TD is more reasonable than the keyboard hardmen here.
Keyboard hardmen???
Jesus check your own site pal.
Oh yeah what else was I told on there,, "I hope you get Mark Fowler disease"
But of course nothing compared to what goes on here ::)
You are a pathetic bigot
so because I question the strategic value of this lawsuit, the motives behind it and whether we have had enough of a debate on groundsharing i must be a Rovers fan? ???
you are right, ignore the fact that the GAA is trying to influence the state in how it funds other sports and the fallout from this has stopped all capital grants in the country.
just keep shouting that 'all rovers fans are cnuts' loud enough and it might all go away. ::)
pathetic stuff.
Quote from: his holiness nb on July 26, 2007, 04:59:57 PM
"I hope you get Mark Fowler disease"
dandruff?
Struck down with no talent?
Ugly?
dublinfella, care to back up your assertion on this thread (http://gaaboard.com/board/index.php?topic=3847.15) that the GAA are making more money from renting out Croke Park than the IRFU and the FAI? You seem to have forgotten to provide any evidence, I just thought I'd remind you on a thread that you are posting on.
please dont let that fockin tosser start another 60 page thread. :-*
ph for the love of jesus , here we go again ... :D :D :D
Hey DublinFella which of these lovely 'ultras' are you?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHV5-Advmf0
-> seem like a nice bunch!!!!!!!!!!
Quote from: lynchbhoy on July 26, 2007, 05:05:57 PM
Quote from: his holiness nb on July 26, 2007, 04:59:57 PM
"I hope you get Mark Fowler disease"
dandruff?
Struck down with no talent?
Ugly?
I already have them three, but to clarify to the people who dont watch eastenders, Mark Fowler had aids.
So basically I was told by the rovers ultras that they hope I get aids.
Dublinfella of course will not comment on any of the comments made by them, sure they are all innocent victims in all this.
It really is difficult to have ANY sympathy for a club full of lowlifes like this.
Quote from: his holiness nb on July 27, 2007, 09:15:31 AM
Quote from: lynchbhoy on July 26, 2007, 05:05:57 PM
Quote from: his holiness nb on July 26, 2007, 04:59:57 PM
"I hope you get Mark Fowler disease"
dandruff?
Struck down with no talent?
Ugly?
I already have them three, but to clarify to the people who dont watch eastenders, Mark Fowler had aids.
So basically I was told by the rovers ultras that they hope I get aids.
Dublinfella of course will not comment on any of the comments made by them, sure they are all innocent victims in all this.
It really is difficult to have ANY sympathy for a club full of lowlifes like this.
So you are going to totally ignore the progress on the stadium and rehash the same old tired shite? You dont like soccer, we get it.
All this because you went on their forum looking for a reaction and got one?
Quote from: dublinfella on July 27, 2007, 10:37:00 AM
So you are going to totally ignore the progress on the stadium and rehash the same old tired shite? You dont like soccer, we get it.
All this because you went on their forum looking for a reaction and got one?
Looking for a reaction? If wondering how the Rovers fans would react to a GAA man asking reasonable questions in a polite manner then I suppose I was looking for a reaction, and boy did I get one ::)
Being told they hope I get Aids was not expected >:(
Regarding ignoring the progress on the stadium, I am not doing that, I have been reading the updates on whats happening and have already told you my opinion on the whole saga.
Regarding your comments on me "rehashing the same old shite" Well hello Pot, I'm the black kettle :D :D :D :D
But you still decline to condemn Rovers fans wishing me aids and instead go on the offense at me for pointing out what was said !!
Jesus christ Dublinfella, thats bad form.
Well surely that's excately what you did? You went onto a gaa forum looking for a reaction and got one. What's the difference?
And he got a much better reaction than I did, wishing me aids then banning me while he has hundreds of posts letting rip at the GAA and anyone who disagrees with him.
I suppose we are just a more tolerant bunch. :)
Quote from: his holiness nb on July 27, 2007, 10:44:40 AM
Quote from: dublinfella on July 27, 2007, 10:37:00 AM
So you are going to totally ignore the progress on the stadium and rehash the same old tired shite? You dont like soccer, we get it.
All this because you went on their forum looking for a reaction and got one?
Looking for a reaction? If wondering how the Rovers fans would react to a GAA man asking reasonable questions in a polite manner then I suppose I was looking for a reaction, and boy did I get one ::)
Being told they hope I get Aids was not expected >:(
Regarding ignoring the progress on the stadium, I am not doing that, I have been reading the updates on whats happening and have already told you my opinion on the whole saga.
Regarding your comments on me "rehashing the same old shite" Well hello Pot, I'm the black kettle :D :D :D :D
But you still decline to condemn Rovers fans wishing me aids and instead go on the offense at me for pointing out what was said !!
Jesus christ Dublinfella, thats bad form.
When have I ever given any indication I condone what you say was said to you? If that was said to you its outrageous. You are sounding very Jie Duffy today