gaaboard.com

Non GAA Discussion => General discussion => Topic started by: Shamrock Shore on August 20, 2017, 11:47:49 PM

Title: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: Shamrock Shore on August 20, 2017, 11:47:49 PM
Stew.

Are you in the Winnebago over to some part where there will be a total eclipse tomorrow?

Next full eclipse visible in Ireland (the very south) will be sometime on 23 Sep 2090
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: stew on August 20, 2017, 11:56:57 PM
Quote from: Shamrock Shore on August 20, 2017, 11:47:49 PM
Stew.

Are you in the Winnebago over to some part where there will be a total eclipse tomorrow?

Next full eclipse visible in Ireland (the very south) will be sometime on 23 Sep 2090

Wish I was Shore, I am stuck in Armagh, I have three friends heading south to experience it, complete with cameras and telescopes etc, I would have been with them if I had have been stateside. (
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: omaghjoe on August 21, 2017, 04:31:59 AM
Iceman....?
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: Orior on August 21, 2017, 09:03:18 AM
About 7 or 8 years ago a friend of mine traveled to China to see a total eclipse. He saw nothing - it was cloudy.
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: Shamrock Shore on August 21, 2017, 10:57:45 AM
I think in a few million years there will be no more total eclipses as the moon is moving a few inches away from earth each year.

It's an amazing set of coincidences that gives rise to the total eclipse.
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: RedHand88 on August 21, 2017, 11:16:47 AM
It always amazes me how then can predict these things to the second, decades in advance.
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: Hardy on August 21, 2017, 11:32:25 AM
Quote from: RedHand88 on August 21, 2017, 11:16:47 AM
It always amazes me how then can predict these things to the second, decades in advance.

- and that they've been able to do it for 330 years.
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: Tony Baloney on August 21, 2017, 01:36:03 PM
We have a site in NC which I think sits in the 96% band so a good few from work are going to see it.
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: AZOffaly on August 21, 2017, 01:44:52 PM
I thought this was about Bonnie Tyler
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: cornerback on August 21, 2017, 03:57:45 PM
Quote from: AZOffaly on August 21, 2017, 01:44:52 PM
I thought this was about Bonnie Tyler

It is:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/21/bonnie-tyler-perform-total-eclipse-heart-solar-eclipse/ (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/21/bonnie-tyler-perform-total-eclipse-heart-solar-eclipse/)
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: stew on August 21, 2017, 04:10:40 PM
My mates are heading to southern Illinois to a University there, apparently that is going to be the spot were the eclipse lasts the longest, hotel rooms have been booked out for years, I wish I could be there.
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: Puckoon on August 21, 2017, 06:23:25 PM
Lots of spots on that mainline have been sold out for months. Columbia Missouri, parts of Idaho - really cool if you're into it I guess.

I'm at 32000 feet right now and can't see a damn thing. Must be on the other side of the plane.
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: Muck Savage on August 21, 2017, 06:55:35 PM
Just seen it here in California, about 75%. Was pretty cool.
This is the third time I saw one, this was by far the best view.
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: Puckoon on August 21, 2017, 06:59:54 PM
Will it still be visible in SoCal in 20 minutes?
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: Eamonnca1 on August 21, 2017, 07:38:17 PM
We got about 80% cover here. Started at about 9:15 this morning, a lot of interest at work. Not much work done this morning. I set up a projection contraption using binoculars and it worked well.
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: omaghjoe on August 21, 2017, 08:18:36 PM
Just used a piece of paper Eammon... worked fine tho it hard to get the balance of size without glare.

Great example of light travelling in straight lines
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: omaghjoe on August 21, 2017, 08:22:45 PM
Quote from: RedHand88 on August 21, 2017, 11:16:47 AM
It always amazes me how then can predict these things to the second, decades in advance.

You could probably predict it for a given location yourself by just recording the path of the moon. No need even for a heliocentic solar system,  relativity or even maths.
Tho you'd need them to predict the exact time, path etc
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: omaghjoe on August 21, 2017, 08:28:23 PM
Quote from: Shamrock Shore on August 21, 2017, 10:57:45 AM
I think in a few million years there will be no more total eclipses as the moon is moving a few inches away from earth each year.

It's an amazing set of coincidences that gives rise to the total eclipse.

No coincidence involved
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: omaghjoe on August 21, 2017, 08:46:47 PM
Space Station getting in on the act

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DHxaqHaWAAAVdE_.jpg)
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: Tony Baloney on August 21, 2017, 10:36:18 PM
Quote from: omaghjoe on August 21, 2017, 08:46:47 PM
Space Station getting in on the act

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DHxaqHaWAAAVdE_.jpg)
6 of them in fact.  ;)
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: Orior on August 21, 2017, 11:36:40 PM
I'm no expert, but that Space Station is getting rather close to the sun.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CQ1E6xJW8AAtEjD.jpg)
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: BennyCake on August 21, 2017, 11:39:46 PM
Quote from: omaghjoe on August 21, 2017, 08:46:47 PM
Space Station getting in on the act

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DHxaqHaWAAAVdE_.jpg)

Some hungry hoor has been at my biscuit!
Title: Re: 2017 Total Eclipse
Post by: stew on August 22, 2017, 12:02:12 AM
Quote from: omaghjoe on August 21, 2017, 08:28:23 PM
Quote from: Shamrock Shore on August 21, 2017, 10:57:45 AM
I think in a few million years there will be no more total eclipses as the moon is moving a few inches away from earth each year.

It's an amazing set of coincidences that gives rise to the total eclipse.

No coincidence involved

600,000,000 years apparently.