http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/video/2009/apr/07/g20-police-assault-video (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/video/2009/apr/07/g20-police-assault-video)
Video reveals G20 police assault on man who died
Exclusive footage obtained by the Guardian shows Ian Tomlinson, who died during G20 protests in London, was attacked from behind by baton–wielding police officer
Dramatic footage obtained by the Guardian shows that the man who died at last week's G20 protests in London was attacked from behind and thrown to the ground by a baton–wielding police officer in riot gear.
Moments after the assault on Ian Tomlinson was captured on video, he suffered a heart attack and died.
The Guardian has handed a dossier of evidence to the police complaints watchdog.
It sheds new light on the events surrounding the death of the 47-year-old newspaper seller, who had been on his way home from work when he was confronted by lines of riot police near the Bank of England.
The submission to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) includes a collection of testimonies from witnesses, along with the video footage, shot at around 7.20pm, which shows Tomlinson at Royal Exchange Passage.
The film reveals that as he walks, with his hands in his pockets, he does not speak to the police or offer any resistance.
A phalanx of officers, some with dogs and some in riot gear, are close behind him and try to urge him forward.
A Metropolitan police officer appears to strike him with a baton, hitting him from behind on his upper thigh.
Moments later, the same policeman rushes forward and, using both hands, pushes Tomlinson in the back and sends him flying to the ground, where he remonstrates with police who stand back, leaving bystanders to help him to his feet.
The man who shot the footage, a fund manager from New York who was in London on business, said: "The primary reason for me coming forward is that it was clear the family were not getting any answers."
The Guardian's dossier also includes a sequence of photographs, taken by three different people, showing the aftermath of the attack, as well as witness statements from people in the area at the time.
A number of witnesses provided time and date-stamped photographs that substantiate their accounts.
Some said they saw police officers attack Tomlinson.
Witnesses said that, prior to the moment captured on video, he had already been hit with batons and thrown to the floor by police who blocked his route home.
One witness, Anna Branthwaite, a photographer, described how, in the minutes before the video was shot, she saw Tomlinson walking towards Cornhill Street.
"A riot police officer had already grabbed him and was pushing him," she said.
"It wasn't just pushing him – he'd rushed him. He went to the floor and he did actually roll. That was quite noticeable.
"It was the force of the impact. He bounced on the floor. It was a very forceful knocking down from behind. The officer hit him twice with a baton when he was lying on the floor.
"So it wasn't just that the officer had pushed him – it became an assault.
"And then the officer picked him up from the back, continued to walk or charge with him, and threw him.
"He was running and stumbling. He didn't turn and confront the officer or anything like that."
The witness accounts contradict the official version of events given by police.
In an official statement on the night of Tomlinson's death, the Metropolitan police made no reference to any contact with officers and simply described attempts by police medics and an ambulance crew to save his life after he collapsed – efforts they said were marred by protesters throwing missiles as first aid was administered .
The force said officers had created a cordon around Tomlinson to give him CPR.
"The officers took the decision to move him as during this time a number of missiles - believed to be bottles - were being thrown at them," it said.
Yesterday, the IPCC began managing an investigation by City of London police into the circumstances of Tomlinson's death after the Guardian published photographs of him on the ground and witness statements indicated he had been assaulted by police officers.
The IPCC commissioner for London, Deborah Glass, said: "Initially, we had accounts from independent witnesses who were on Cornhill, who told us that there had been no contact between the police and Mr Tomlinson when he collapsed."
"However, other witnesses who saw him in the Royal Exchange area have since told us that Mr Tomlinson did have contact with police officers.
"This would have been a few minutes before he collapsed. It is important that we are able to establish as far as possible whether that contact had anything to do with his death."
The IPCC added that Tomlinson was captured on CCTV walking onto Royal Exchange Passage.
"This is the aspect of the incident that the IPCC is now investigating," it said.
It was here the video was shot. A post mortem carried out by a Home Office pathologist last Friday revealed Tomlinson died of a heart attack.
Prior to seeing the dossier of evidence, Tomlinson's family said in a statement: "There were so many people around where Ian died, and so many people with cameras, that somebody must have seen what happened in the Royal Exchange passageway.
"We need to know what happened there and whether it had anything to do with Ian's death.
"We know that some people who were at the protest may not feel comfortable talking to the police.
"People are putting pictures on the internet, writing on blogs and talking to journalists. But we really need them to talk to the people who are investigating what happened."
What's with the thread title?
Unfortunately there are two sides to this story and opposing views will never reconcile.
a) the use of force was commensurate with his previous actions. He might have had a heart attack anyway, even if he hadnt been there
b) the use of force by the officer was certainly more than necessary which accelerated the heart attack
Lets all just agree to disagree now.
Quote from: Orior on April 08, 2009, 10:32:49 AM
What's with the thread title?
What did you expect?
Don't get your logic Orior but I may be missing something. Police attack man from behind - end of story, the IPCC have to look at this case now.
I could not just accept to agree to disagree if I were related to this man, they deserve some justice, doubt they will get it though.
Not sure about this title either considering the tread below about the Gairda killed in Letterkenny. They aren't all like that though sadly too many are and only for this footage would never have come to light. Is why I was so dubious of all that bad students-good cops rhetoric regarding Holyland trouble on St Patricks Day. What yer man did in London is fairly typical of police.
What do you expect from a pig, but(only) a grunt..is that what you meant?
Reports that he had already got a beating off the cnuts before this footage hence he looks a bit slow footed. Cover up started straight away with them battling to save him under a hail of bottles. De Menezes 'jumping the tube barriers with a heavy coat on anyone?
Indeed Mr Sandman.
Quote from: passedit on April 08, 2009, 10:50:19 AM
Reports that he had already got a beating off the cnuts before this footage hence he looks a bit slow footed. Cover up started straight away with them battling to save him under a hail of bottles. De Menezes 'jumping the tube barriers with a heavy coat on anyone?
Indeed Mr Sandman.
Thought so, good title ;D
I'm keeping an open mind until i know that the victim was (a) carrying out a peaceful protest, and (b) that the heart attack was a direct result of the violence by the police.
PS. Thanks for enlightening me. I couldnt work out why someone would have a handle of "Mrs and Man"
(a) carrying out a peaceful protest,
No just trying to make his way home from work.
(b) that the heart attack was a direct result of the violence by the police.
Do you expect an 'independant enquiry' to establish this? Even if it wasn't is an unprovoked attack justified?
Quote from: Orior on April 08, 2009, 11:25:48 AM
I'm keeping an open mind until i know that the victim was (a) carrying out a peaceful protest, and (b) that the heart attack was a direct result of the violence by the police.
PS. Thanks for enlightening me. I couldnt work out why someone would have a handle of "Mrs and Man"
:D it could be either or, orior
Quote from: passedit on April 08, 2009, 11:29:25 AM
(a) carrying out a peaceful protest,
No just trying to make his way home from work.
(b) that the heart attack was a direct result of the violence by the police.
Do you expect an 'independant enquiry' to establish this? Even if it wasn't is an unprovoked attack justified?
Well if thats true then its shocking, and the policeman should be up for assault or even manslaughter.
Any report I've read today has indicated that he was merely walking home from work and was not involved in any of the protests, he certainly didn't look to be in the videos in the BBC site.
A slight coincidence that he took a heart attack shortly after being bombarded to the ground by suprise ? I think not..
what about the fella who got fined £350 yesterday in Belfast for shouting at the police on St Patricks day.....
Maybe he should have grunted at them instead....
All reports suggest that this guy was not a protester, he was merely trying to make his way home from work.
However if he had been a protester do people actually think the actions described in the article are justified?
Anyone who does then I advise you to read up on so-called 'kettling' tactics used by the state law enforcers. A group of anywhere between 15-20k are hemmed in tightly and the police reinforce their lines and squeeze the crowd, putting pressure on them from all angles, just as much up to the point where it may be considered dangerous. Hence, 'kettling'
This group was kept against their will for 7-8 hours with nobody being allowed in or out, turning many of the alleys and subways into public sewers.
No doubt a small minority of the protesters may be part of far left political groups, which some people on here may regard as a threat, but the vast majority 95% are made up of peaceful demonstartors from groups like Amnesty International and War on Want but to name a couple.
The Guardian has some great eye witness accounts in their articles, but don't take their word for it, go to YouTube where there are countless videos showing disgraceful behaviour by the police. One in particular shows every protester maintaining their arms in the air while some of them receive heavy blows to the head from the police.
N.B. The British Police force has a constitutional duty to facilitate peaceful protest.
Reassuring to know they don't always get away with doing what they like...
Pc guilty of girl's crash death
Hayley Adamson
Schoolgirl Hayley Adamson was killed instantly
A police officer has been found guilty of causing the death of a 16-year-old schoolgirl by dangerous driving.
Pc John Dougal, 41, had accelerated to 94mph (151km/h) in a 30mph zone before he hit Hayley Adamson in Newcastle in May, the city's crown court heard.
A police driving expert told the court that the patrol officer's speed was unjustified, but Dougal had claimed he had been driving safely.
The car's siren and lights had not been activated at the time, the jury heard.
Following the conviction, Judge David Hodson said a prison sentence was inevitable.
The crash happened on Denton Road in Scotswood on 19 May.
In-car footage
The court was told that Dougal was reacting to the Volvo's automatic number plate recognition system, which alerted him to a passing car - indicating it could potentially be linked to a crime.
He accelerated to catch up with the Renault Megane and struck Hayley when she stepped into the road.
Dougal said he had not wanted to alert the Megane driver to his presence by putting on his sirens or blue lights.
The number plate recognition data was later found to be out of date.
Pc John Dougal
Pc John Dougal is a qualified advanced driver
At the time of the crash, the qualified advanced driver was travelling so fast he had effectively become a passenger in his own car and had surrendered "to physics", an expert witness told the jury.
Retired police inspector and police driving standards expert Gordon Robertson said he "could not imagine" a situation where Dougal should have accelerated to more than 90mph, without activating his blue lights or siren.
The court was shown footage from the in-car video camera, including the moment the teenager was hit by the car and flung out of shot.
Judge David Hodson said: "You will be remanded in custody and you must appreciate that the inevitable outcome of a conviction of an offence of this nature is an immediate sentence of custody."
He added: "I am sure everybody who has sat through this case will be acutely conscious of the grief there has been to the Adamson family."
The jury of eight women and four men took an hour and a half to reach their unanimous verdict.
Dougal was remanded in custody to be sentenced on 1 May.
Ian Tomlinson death: G20 witnesses tell of dogs, batons and an attack by police
From G20 protesters to journalists to bystanders, those who saw the events leading up to Ian Tomlinson's death speak out
The Guardian obtained this footage of Ian Tomlinson at a G20 protest in London, shortly before he died. It shows Tomlinson, who was not part of the demonstration, being assaulted from behind and pushed to the ground by baton-wielding police Link to this video
The main protests of the day had ebbed away but hundreds of people were still penned inside a police cordon near the Bank of England around 7pm last Wednesday when newspaper seller Ian Tomlinson started on his journey home through the City. He never made it. What happened in Tomlinson's final half hour before he collapsed and died of a heart attack is now the subject of an inquiry on behalf of the Independent Police Complaints Commission. The Guardian has gathered statements from 15 witnesses who saw Tomlinson to piece together a forensic reconstruction his movements. This directly contradicts the official version of events put out by police in the aftermath of Tomlinson's death. The witnesses accuse police of lashing at protesters and bystanders alike, attacking them with batons, shields and dogs. Officers are alleged to have attacked Tomlinson twice; both times from behind and as he was walking away. Eight witnesses produced photographic evidence, time- and date-stamped, that corroborates their version of events. Three said they saw Tomlinson being assaulted by riot police. Here are their accounts.
A: Marcus Bensasson, 30, photographer, south London
I was taking pictures of police charging protesters and using their batons. It was violent. One charge took people by surprise. They thought they were at a safe distance and then suddenly police - riot police - were charging at them. My photographs show police attacking protesters with batons. One image shows a bystander being shoved in the back with a shield at the very spot Ian Tomlinson collapsed.
B: Dr Justin Meggitt, 40, senior lecturer in religious studies, Cambridge University
I was with the crowd at Cornhill. But when police started coming up I went down the pedestrianised zone, Royal Exchange Buildings, on the Threadneedle Street end.
I saw a couple of occasions when police with batons hit individuals. It wasn't a big row of officers. They seemed to be spread out. There were dogs along the street.
I was pretty disturbed. I didn't expect that kind of violence. So at the time I took pictures and on at least one occasion I went up to the policeman to complain that he appeared to have hit someone, right in front of me, for no apparent reason.
The dog attacks occurred at about 7.10pm, when a police dog, as far as I could see, bit the handler and then bit a man. The man who was bitten was showing people his injuries. I have a photograph. They were very deep gashes in the top of his arm.
Then, as the crowd surged out of Cornhill at around 7.12pm and some people ran down Royal Exchange Buildings, I saw a policeman clubbing somebody. This was a young man - I saw him throw a plastic bottle. The policeman ran at him and clubbed him. He did fall over and then ran away. Then there was another dog attack at 7.16pm. The person was a tall, younger man and the policeman set the dog on him.
And then, soon after that, about 10 seconds afterwards, something happened in front of me where someone was clubbed again. That person was on the ground and they were being hit, at least once. They were on the floor and hit. That struck me as another unprovoked assault. I was really shocked. I know it's difficult policing these things. But these incidents took me by real surprise. It seemed as though individual police officers were taking it out on bystanders for no reason. They seemed extremely pumped up. After that I thought it was unwise to stay in that area because it was extremely violent.
C: Anna Branthwaite, 36, freelance photographer, south London
There had been a situation where a small number of police officers had become outnumbered by protesters in Cornhill, and had retreated into the pedestrian street, Royal Exchange Buildings. It was like, anything could happen right now. Riot officers began to arrive and within minutes the police had regained control around the Threadneedle Street end where I went to stand.
At this point there were probably about 20 officers - some dog handlers, some riot officers. And members of the public - city workers, people watching - were being stopped around the traffic lights although some were being allowed to walk through the pedestrian street that was now relatively clear, with a few protesters still standing around but certainly not a crowd.
The dog handlers began to sweep through the pedestrian street to start forming a police line. A dog barked and I saw one protester was on the floor who managed to get up. That's what drew my attention to that spot. It was then that I noticed Ian Tomlinson, who was walking from Threadneadle Street direction, walking towards Cornhill Street. A riot police officer had already grabbed him and was pushing him.
It wasn't just pushing him - he'd rushed him. He went to the floor and he did actually roll. That was quite noticeable. It was the force of the impact. He bounced on the floor. It was a very forceful knocking-down from behind. The officer hit him twice with a baton when he was lying on the floor.
So it wasn't just that the officer had pushed him - it became an assault. And then the officer picked him up from the back, continued to walk or charge with him, and threw him. He was running and stumbling. He didn't turn and confront the officer or anything like that.
Tomlinson was not confronting a police cordon. He was not in a crowd of protesters being corralled by police. He was walking on the street away from the police with barely anyone around him when he was attacked from behind.
I think the officers were so fired up, it had been very intimidating for them to be outnumbered. When they came back I think this one officer just rushed in and lashed out. And it happened to be Mr Tomlinson. The next time I saw Ian Tomlinson was when he had collapsed about 50 yards down around the corner and surrounded by a group of police officers.
D: Kezia Rolfe, 27, NGO researcher, east London
I saw a man approaching the police line from my right. He was quite tall with a beer belly and short hair. I later recognised him from a picture. He was on his own. He walked up to the police across the Royal Exchange Building, towards the centre left of their line.
He did not appear drunk - he was walking normally. I saw him suddenly fall back as though flung down with force. It was as though he had been spun. He fell and hit the top of his head hard. I was shocked. He lay on the ground for around 30 seconds without moving before a protester helped him up. The police did not help him at all.
E: Amiri Howe, 24, actor/musician, west London
We stood on a ledge near Cornhill. Before he got hit, at the beginning of the whole thing - we were watching the protesters at the Bank of England. Police got into a couple of scuffles with people. They were pushing the line forward, pushing the line forward.
We saw a couple of scuffles happening. Our friends were inside trying to get out - no water, no food, we wanted to get them out. Police started coming forward. Missiles started to be thrown. They came in with their batons, stamping.
The guy [Tomlinson] was stood there. He got hit near the head with a baton. It was like a pencil, he just fell to the floor and hit his head again when he hit the floor. When he got hit, police were coming forwards. I saw him fall so I moved back. But I saw him on the floor and someone picking him up - that's when I took the picture.
If there was CCTV then they will see exactly what happened - which is exactly what I said happened. You see in that corner where the dogs came up, it was proper chaos. After that, I was taking pictures of police and the dog line, and a girl came and said, 'this guy needs help'. He was further back down the road. It was the same guy that got hit. He was wearing the exact same stuff.
F: Investment fund manager, 38, from New York who filmed the attack
The primary reason for me coming forward is that it was clear the family weren't getting any answers. I saw him wandering around [before he was attacked]. He was just taking a look. He just got too close to the police line. [When he was attacked] it was absolutely horrible. I didn't put two and two together. Then I looked at the footage again and thought 'my God, it's the man they pushed to the ground'. It must be him it was minutes later who collapsed.
G: Jasper Jackson, 23, journalist, Paddington
There was an altercation with a protester who had been doing graffiti. He was dragged by police and smashed his head against the door. After a bit of scuffling they withdrew down a side street. The police then brought in a set of dogs and blocked Royal Exchange Buildings. The picture I have of him is of him stumbling in front of the protesters and in front of the police dogs. He looked dazed, a glazed look on his face.
Later, someone shouted to the police with a loudhailer: there's a casualty down - can we get a medic? The police took this seriously. Out of an alley came medics and policemen in riot gear.
There were a couple of people throwing bottles in the direction. A bottle smashed near a Starbucks. Protesters told them to stop it. In fact, threatening to kill other protesters if they did anything to disrupt the treatment.
H: Press photographer 1, anonymous
There were two sets of police and a sort of standoff. Those police started moving forward to try and push the protesters back. If you see the pictures you can see exactly what they were doing. The batons were up, they were moving forward, they were using their shields.
I saw this guy on the ground. I photographed him. I saw there was something seriously wrong with him when I got the first picture of his face. There was a couple of police around him and the protesters were beginning to throw things. Then the protesters were saying, 'stop, there's one of ours down there'.
I: Press photographer 2, anonymous
I was at the police line at Cornhill at the Bank of England. We were being pushed back by the police line. The police were coming forward to cajole people. They were using batons. I moved back and as I was moving back towards Bishopsgate I saw this guy on his back being attended to. A missile was thrown in the direction. But I wouldn't like to say it was intended at police. It sort of landed in the vicinity.
J: Daniel MacPhee, 24, social support worker, Kingston
If the truth be that he died of a heart attack it's not surprising really because it felt like people were running for their lives. I looked over to my left and there was a man lying in the street. Someone shouted out, 'he fell down, over there' - as if to say that he fell down before somehow.
I rang 999. I was on the phone. They said, 'is he breathing?' Then they asked me to put him on his back. So with the help of the person I was with, we managed to get him on to his back.
Not long after that a group of four or five riot police came running out from the crowd and surrounded him. The ambulancewoman on the phone said to me, 'can you pass me to the police?' I said, 'I've got the ambulance on the phone, do you want to speak to them?' They just ignored me.
When the police interviewed me, I said that I saw no violence toward this individual, which I didn't. And afterwards the police said it would take a very brave coroner to proclaim that the cause of death was because he was beaten up, or because of the protests that day. They said it would take a brave coroner to suggest the cause of death was because of any wrongdoing by the police.
Initially I just kind of forgot about it. But it was later on in the day that I thought, why would someone say it would take a brave coroner? If the facts are there.
K: Callum Holden-Cooper, 20, student
He came from the direction of the police and he just collapsed.
He didn't have any blood on his face. He seemed quite out of it. I saw he was breathing. A guy with a loud hailer called out. Four riot police and two medics came around the guy who collapsed. The police line kept moving. The police kept charging forward. We kept thinking we were going to get killed.
L: Elias Stoakes, 25, student, Mile End
There were two missiles that I remember, thrown from the back. The police claim that protesters impeded them from treating him because of a barrage of missiles was completely untrue. Protesters from the crowd wanted to help him. The crowd were extremely angry at people who had thrown missiles. They were mostly concerned about police charging. Earlier on the same street they hit me with batons over my thigh and calf. They were saying things like, 'That got you up. Now f**k off'. I still have the bruises. That was because I was stopping to help someone who hurt their head and they came at me. They pressed the pressure point under my ear to make me move.
M: Medical student, anonymous
We were all running - he was running near me. I probably only noticed him just before he fell. Police were chasing us with their batons out.
Then he fell to the floor. A few other people went over to him as well. Then the police charged everyone again. They were all charging towards us. He was lying with his feet toward the police. I stood in the way with my arms out to stop people from running into him. I said: there's a man down. The people ran around me.
The person on the phone to the ambulance told the police the ambulance service wanted to speak to them. He held the phone out to the police officer. The police officer held the phone and said, 'no, move along, we're dealing with this'.
N: Natalie Langford, 21, student from London
We had been by the police line shouting 'let them out' because of the people stuck inside. It was peaceful at first. The police were saying: move back, move back, and surging forward.
Some students were sitting down on the floor - I was as well. They came in using batons against us. Police came in and began hitting people with batons. My friend got hit quite badly. It was a minute after that we saw him [Ian Tomlinson] stumbling about. He just seemed really disorientated and stumbling. Then he collapsed.
O: Peter Apps, 20, law student, east London
He was outside a shop. I think it was a glass-fronted shop. When I first saw him he was stumbling along the pavement on the left-hand side of the road. He was disorientated and stumbling and collided with the wall that was jutting out of a shop, and then fell over. Someone had called an ambulance. When protesters were giving him first aid, I looked up and I saw a lot of protesters running toward me and the police charging toward them with their batons out.
Independent probe into G20 death
Ian Tomlinson lying on the ground in Cornhill (Photo: Kris Sime)
The IPCC said it will examine footage of Mr Tomlinson being pushed
A police watchdog said it is working to identify officers in video footage of a man pushed to the ground at the G20 protest minutes before his death.
More developments, they're having difficulty identifying the rozzers. ::)
Check out his route home.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/interactive/2009/apr/08/g20-police-assault-ian-tomlinson (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/interactive/2009/apr/08/g20-police-assault-ian-tomlinson)
And this
The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) also announced it would request a second post-mortem test as part of an independent inquiry.
The decision was made after footage surfaced of Ian Tomlinson being shoved.
Mr Tomlinson, 47, suffered a heart attack several minutes after walking away from being pushed by an officer.
The IPCC said it will examine the footage.
Following Mr Tomlinson's death the IPCC said it will oversee an investigation into the incident which will be carried out by the City of London police.
After the new footage surfaced Mr Tomlinson's stepson Paul King has told the BBC the family "want answers".
Apparently the post mortem will show the guy died from internal bleeding NOT a heart attack ... that bastard who hit him could be facing a manslaughter charge
No questions being asked about shodiness of original post mortem?!
I wouldn't like to be the cop that hit him - he's already been interviewed under caution - what chance of a charge let alone a conviction ?
A police officer has been interviewed under caution for manslaughter after a new post-mortem examination overturned the cause of Ian Tomlinson's death.
The newspaper-seller was struck and pushed over by a police officer during G20 protests on 1 April in the City.
Now a fresh examination has found he died of abdominal bleeding, not a heart attack, as originally thought.
Lawyers for the family said the new post-mortem test raised the likelihood of a manslaughter charge.
In its statement, the Coroner's Court said the inquest had looked at the first post-mortem examination carried out after Mr Tomlinson collapsed and died on the evening of 1 April.
That examination, carried out by Dr Freddy Patel, concluded Mr Tomlinson had diseased heart and liver and a substantial amount of blood in the abdominal cavity.