China Coronavirus

Started by lurganblue, January 23, 2020, 09:52:32 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

armaghniac

Quote from: imtommygunn on July 17, 2020, 08:56:15 PM
9512 seems like a lot if it is purely those who have been exposed. I would guess there would be more than just contacts have been tested.

Not sure what they do up here though I do suspect there is some criteria for contact based testing but no idea what.

Yes, there is also systematic testing of people in health occupations.
If at first you don't succeed, then goto Plan B

imtommygunn

Ah that explains a bit more. Cheers.

armaghniac

Quote from: imtommygunn on July 17, 2020, 09:24:20 PM
Ah that explains a bit more. Cheers.

stated elsewhere that they are proactively testing 32,000 care workers every week for a month.
This is a good thing, as it helps keep it out of hospitals and nursing homes.
If at first you don't succeed, then goto Plan B

Milltown Row2

Question on testing and quarantining

If you are in a country that requires you to isolate for 14 days when you come back, can you not have a test, let's say 4 days when you're back. Would it not tell you whether you have it or not? Or is it because you need 14 days for it to develop?



None of us are getting out of here alive, so please stop treating yourself like an after thought. Ea

Cunny Funt

The numbers after another week.

Deaths in the ROI  the the last 7 days = 8 (two less than last week)

Case this week 143 (16 more than last week and that's low when you consider the R number was higher for this week and over 50,000 tests was carried out the last 7 days)

trailer

Deaths massively over exaggerated. If you test positive at any stage 28 days before you die even if you recover and die it's recorded as a coronavirus death. In Eng there's no time limit. Government has over inflated this for some reason!

seafoid

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2020/07/18/london-ponders-future-pandemic-turns-capital-ghost-town/

London ponders its future as pandemic turns capital into a ghost town

A deeper downturn and slower recovery mean that the capital's post-Covid economy may look very different

ByTom Rees18 July 2020 • 6:00am




It's catastrophic. No audience, no income," says James Williams, chief executive of the Shaftesbury Theatre in the West End.

Its production of '& Juliet' is postponed indefinitely, almost all its staff are furloughed and Williams says the local economy is suffering from the curtain temporarily falling on Theatreland this summer.

"For every £1 spent on a theatre seat in the West End, £5 is spent in the local economy, so the theatres are a critical part to the success of central London." Local businesses need the West End's theatres to "come back to life", he says.

Nearby in Victoria – a transport hub for both commuters and visitors flying into Gatwick – a row of shops catering to tourists are almost all vacant and the train station is suffering from the collapse in foreign arrivals. And in the City, the usual buzz of finance workers are conspicuous by their absence in the pubs, cafés and restaurants.

"We would not have any business if the office workers don't come back to the City," says Lauren MacDougall, manager of craft beer house the Pelt Trader as she still waits to reopen.

"Knowing the City, people will always want to drink and socialise. It's going to be a slow process getting back to the 'normal days' but it will get back to normal."

The cultural, tourism and business capital of Britain, central London's economy has been a victim of its own success in virus-stricken industries.

A plethora of live growth signals tracked by economists reveals central London has transformed from the country's economic powerhouse to a ghost town devoid of activity. It is suffering a deeper downturn and slower recovery than all other towns and cities in the UK and capitals in Europe.

Last week footfall in central London was down 73pc compared to a year earlier, worse than anywhere in the UK, according to Springboard. The UK average was 52pc lower than last year, while outer London is down a more modest 38pc. Separate footfall data suggests it is also recovering slower than anywhere else.

Movement of people and vehicles in cities – a measure tracked by economists for hints of activity – is much lower in London than any other European capital, Citymapper data suggests, while restaurant bookings were down 82pc on Tuesday compared to 66pc lower in the UK as a whole and up 3pc in Germany, OpenTable reveals.

"Because there is a very vibrant tourism, hospitality and leisure industry, it has a disproportionately high number of such businesses in central London, more than any other part of the country," warns Rajesh Agrawal, deputy mayor of London for business. He says more support is needed for the firms and believes the winding down of the furlough scheme disproportionately affects London.

"In Canary Wharf, 120,000 people work there but only 7,000 are coming in. So what do you think is going to happen to the small bars and the restaurants?"

The economic activity generated in London is equivalent to the output of Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the North East and Yorkshire combined. It would be just outside the world's top 20 economies if it were an independent country, and in central London around 10pc of the country's output is generated in just 0.01pc of its land, according to the Centre for London, the think tank.

A city so reliant on international visitors, its public transport infrastructure and millions of office workers has proven to be ultra-vulnerable to a pandemic. Stopping the flow of people from the suburbs and abroad has brought activity to a complete halt.

A high street recovery tracker by Centre for Cities looking at footfall suggests that London is suffering the slowest recovery in the entire country. Smaller and often more deprived towns where office work is less important have seen the most rapid return to normality, including Basildon, Burnley and Doncaster.

"The recovery in London is not about shops reopening, it's about offices reopening, visitors coming back to this country from overseas and it is about public transport being perceived as safe and accessible," says Andrew Carter, chief executive of Centre for Cities.

The trends that have paralysed the city's economy are "evident in other places but it is the extreme nature of it" in London, Carter says.

"80pc of London's workforce coming into its central business district do so by public transport, in other cities it's around the 50pc mark.

"London is a global destination for international tourists, Manchester is not to the same degree."

The natives are also less likely to need to commute into the centre, given the prevalence of service sector jobs done almost entirely on computers. Some 57pc of Londoners were working from home in April, well above any other region and the UK average of 47pc, according to the Office for National Statistics.

London's reliance on an overcrowded transport system means offices cannot bring workers back even if they can make their sites safe. Tube journeys are around a fifth of their normal levels, according to Transport for London data.

Some fear a temporary loss in the capital's output could become permanent, if Covid-19 leads to a move towards remote working, or the failure to produce a vaccine means annual spikes in infections. The post-Covid economy could look very different from its pre-pandemic shape and to the detriment of the capital's centre.

A remote working revolution would lead to much less office space being needed and less workers travelling in from London's suburbs and surrounding counties.

Richard Tice, property veteran and Brexit Party chairman, warns the virtual abandonment of the city centre could cut office rents by as much as 40pc over the next 18 months with retail rents even harder hit.

"It is dire. Places have reopened and then shut again as there is no footfall. I have spoken to dozens of office workers who say they don't have to come back until the new year."

An increase in remote working could make many city centre businesses unsustainable and push those services out to the suburbs as workers move.

Others remain optimistic that central London's economy can adapt to the new normal, however. Eventually City workers will flock to the pubs, travellers will buzz through Victoria and the bright lights of the West End will return. How long it will take and whether pre-virus activity levels ever return remains uncertain.

Agrawal says: "When we talk about the recovery, it's not just about going back to the old normal. We need to reimagine what our city of the future might look like."

Richard Brown, deputy director at Centre for London, says firms reducing their office space will allow new entrants to move in.

"In previous recessions, the area around Hoxton and Shoreditch, a lot of vacant property arose there and you had creative industries moving in. The case is still there for big cities like London but it will be different."


Cunny Funt

Quote from: trailer on July 19, 2020, 06:50:11 PM
Deaths massively over exaggerated. If you test positive at any stage 28 days before you die even if you recover and die it's recorded as a coronavirus death. In Eng there's no time limit. Government has over inflated this for some reason!

The ROI are one of the few countries that follow WHO guidelines and that means to include every type of deaths. England for months were only counting hospital deaths so I don't buy their claim that their overall death toll is exaggerated by much if at all.

RadioGAAGAA

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-53467022

I don't really trust BB-Pravda for my information anymore... but have verified this elsewhere.

i usse an speelchekor

Taylor

Quote from: RadioGAAGAA on July 20, 2020, 09:02:10 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-53467022

I don't really trust BB-Pravda for my information anymore... but have verified this elsewhere.

If this proves correct Radio how far away are we from actually having a vaccine distributed to the people on the ground?

Thought I read somewhere we could still be a year away even if these current trials are successful

RadioGAAGAA

#6790
That is a treatment, not a vaccine.

(Assuming no hiccups) vaccine will be some time in 2021. Probably later than earlier - all shortcuts are being taken - and there is a degree of risk with it - and I'm kind of dismayed that conversation doesn't seem to be happening. All talk is of the date and not of the compromises taken to try and achieve that date. Its like "we're trying to get a vaccine for XX/XX/XXX", then when it arrives casually announce after people start taking it "oh, by the way, we've no idea of the long term effects of this".

Yes fine, the vaccine is likely the better option - but at least let people know so they aren't walking in blind and have time to get their head around it.


For those in the general population that are low risk - I have to admit I'm not sure if taking a rushed vaccine is a great idea or not. Because clinical trials have been so compressed, there is simply no way of knowing if there are longer term implications or not.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions and all that.


Obviously for those at high risk, that balancing act changes and the vaccine is a bit of a no-brainer.
i usse an speelchekor

imtommygunn

Quote from: Cunny Funt on July 19, 2020, 10:44:39 PM
Quote from: trailer on July 19, 2020, 06:50:11 PM
Deaths massively over exaggerated. If you test positive at any stage 28 days before you die even if you recover and die it's recorded as a coronavirus death. In Eng there's no time limit. Government has over inflated this for some reason!

The ROI are one of the few countries that follow WHO guidelines and that means to include every type of deaths. England for months were only counting hospital deaths so I don't buy their claim that their overall death toll is exaggerated by much if at all.

I don't know that you can trust much reported in the uk, England especially, these days :( yeah I think there is misinformation both ways in the recording of it.

I watched the bbc briefly this morning and they said early next year. Like has been said I probably wouldn't be rushing for it.

Taylor

Quote from: RadioGAAGAA on July 20, 2020, 09:53:40 AM
That is a treatment, not a vaccine.

(Assuming no hiccups) vaccine will be some time in 2021. Probably later than earlier - all shortcuts are being taken - and there is a degree of risk with it - and I'm kind of dismayed that conversation doesn't seem to be happening. All talk is of the date and not of the compromises taken to try and achieve that date. Its like "we're trying to get a vaccine for XX/XX/XXX", then when it arrives casually announce after people start taking it "oh, by the way, we've no idea of the long term effects of this".

Yes fine, the vaccine is likely the better option - but at least let people know so they aren't walking in blind and have time to get their head around it.


For those in the general population that are low risk - I have to admit I'm not sure if taking a rushed vaccine is a great idea or not. Because clinical trials have been so compressed, there is simply no way of knowing if there are longer term implications or not.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions and all that.


Obviously for those at high risk, that balancing act changes and the vaccine is a bit of a no-brainer.

Just clicked on link - yes a treatment - think the vaccine was at Oxford last week

seafoid

https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/matt-williams-two-weeks-in-a-hotel-room-with-a-broom-handle-shoved-up-your-nose-1.4306336

Recent reports from the BBC describe the pitiful state of a medical system close to collapse in the South African city of Port Elizabeth, the home of the Southern Kings. As the virus rips across South Africa, the participation of the Kings and the Cheetahs in the Pro 14 is highly problematic.

imtommygunn

Paula Bradshaw from the Green Party (up north) taking some flak today. She was going to go on her Italian holiday until the media got hold of it now obviously was never going to go lol.