NFL Division 1 2024

[JoG2]

Tyrone defending woefully and look very light up front. Be interesting to see if they can put in a second half like last week.

Ref very whistle happy but don't think he's favouring one side over the other both getting some handy ones.

Wouldnt say they are light up front. Had 5 wides in a row. Different day they would have went over. Happy they are creating chances.

You are literally cementing screen's point 

Not really lol. Light up front means no one creating scoring chances, we created loads just didnt convert many 😅

Eh, not scoring is light up front, literally, you know, putting the thing over the bar! 

[trailer]

People should just stop commenting on referee's decisions when their own team is playing. When you've calmed down and go back and read them you come across as deranged 90% of the time. (You being everyone).

I wanted to start a separate thread to discuss all the anti Tyrone decisions. But the Junta that run the GAAboard deleted it and warned me! A f**king warning for starting a thread about GAA!!

Just do it fairly. That's all we're asking! That surely is in everyone's interests?

You were asked to put your comments in the Tyrone thread, as I can't move threads/posts in the latest version of the board.

Trailer being economical with the truth? Colour me shocked

Am I ?

[tonto1888]

Last week he asked the question... when has any other county conceded a black card and a penalty for denial of a goal scoring opportunity? The first game on the RTÉ highlights show - yes the first one - a team (not his team) concede a penalty and a black card for denial of a goal scoring opportunity  I didn't see the game today but someone says Paudie Clifford wasn't the third man in. I don't know but would it be possible he is wrong...

I said PC wasnt the third man in. Two Tyrone men and a Kerry man were in before PC

[blanketattack]

The linesman caused that. Player took the mark. The fact that he went out after landing is irrelevant. He was in when his feet hit the ground.

It wasn't a mark because:

"In order to be awarded a "Mark", the ball must not have been touched in flight by another player."

[RedHand88]

The linesman caused that. Player took the mark. The fact that he went out after landing is irrelevant. He was in when his feet hit the ground.

It wasn't a mark because:

"In order to be awarded a "Mark", the ball must not have been touched in flight by another player."

Was this always a rule?? Sure players touch all the time challenging for a ball?

[tonto1888]

The linesman caused that. Player took the mark. The fact that he went out after landing is irrelevant. He was in when his feet hit the ground.

It wasn't a mark because:

"In order to be awarded a "Mark", the ball must not have been touched in flight by another player."

Was this always a rule?? Sure players touch all the time challenging for a ball?

Where is that from? Looked a mark to me. I thought the linesman signalled for a sideline ball anyway

[Armagh18]

The linesman caused that. Player took the mark. The fact that he went out after landing is irrelevant. He was in when his feet hit the ground.

It wasn't a mark because:

"In order to be awarded a "Mark", the ball must not have been touched in flight by another player."

Was this always a rule?? Sure players touch all the time challenging for a ball?

Where is that from? Looked a mark to me. I thought the linesman signalled for a sideline ball anyway

Didn't see it but if it was a mark then it wouldnt matter if he crossed the line?

Actually thinking of it is there a rule covering that?

[tonto1888]

The linesman caused that. Player took the mark. The fact that he went out after landing is irrelevant. He was in when his feet hit the ground.

It wasn't a mark because:

"In order to be awarded a "Mark", the ball must not have been touched in flight by another player."

Was this always a rule?? Sure players touch all the time challenging for a ball?

Where is that from? Looked a mark to me. I thought the linesman signalled for a sideline ball anyway

Didn't see it but if it was a mark then it wouldnt matter if he crossed the line?

Actually thinking of it is there a rule covering that?

He didn't cross the line. Not even close to it. I just thought that's what the linesman signalled for

[tyrone08]

Last week he asked the question... when has any other county conceded a black card and a penalty for denial of a goal scoring opportunity? The first game on the RTÉ highlights show - yes the first one - a team (not his team) concede a penalty and a black card for denial of a goal scoring opportunity  I didn't see the game today but someone says Paudie Clifford wasn't the third man in. I don't know but would it be possible he is wrong...

I said PC wasnt the third man in. Two Tyrone men and a Kerry man were in before PC

Really??? https://twitter.com/DanielHussey2/status/1764286069896269873?t=0l8NNwu5ytw45bq5a8Qngg&s=19

[trailer]

The linesman caused that. Player took the mark. The fact that he went out after landing is irrelevant. He was in when his feet hit the ground.

It wasn't a mark because:

"In order to be awarded a "Mark", the ball must not have been touched in flight by another player."

New information this.

[tonto1888]

Last week he asked the question... when has any other county conceded a black card and a penalty for denial of a goal scoring opportunity? The first game on the RTÉ highlights show - yes the first one - a team (not his team) concede a penalty and a black card for denial of a goal scoring opportunity  I didn't see the game today but someone says Paudie Clifford wasn't the third man in. I don't know but would it be possible he is wrong...

I said PC wasnt the third man in. Two Tyrone men and a Kerry man were in before PC

Really??? https://twitter.com/DanielHussey2/status/1764286069896269873?t=0l8NNwu5ytw45bq5a8Qngg&s=19

m
Maybe show post the link with the full video.
Conn takes a good mark. Linesman somehow gives a line all. Conn doesn't let go. DC knocks him over. Kerry 6 tries to take the ball then the Tyrone 6 and 11 come in before PC. The video you posted missed that bit out

[screenexile]

Tyrone defending woefully and look very light up front. Be interesting to see if they can put in a second half like last week.

Ref very whistle happy but don't think he's favouring one side over the other both getting some handy ones.

Wouldnt say they are light up front. Had 5 wides in a row. Different day they would have went over. Happy they are creating chances.

You are literally cementing screen's point 

Not really lol. Light up front means no one creating scoring chances, we created loads just didnt convert many 😅

Eh, not scoring is light up front, literally, you know, putting the thing over the bar! 

Sorry lads I meant light as in they had 3 small lads up front!!

[tonto1888]

The linesman caused that. Player took the mark. The fact that he went out after landing is irrelevant. He was in when his feet hit the ground.

It wasn't a mark because:

"In order to be awarded a "Mark", the ball must not have been touched in flight by another player."

New information this.

Can't see it before conn catches it but if they are saying the Kerry 6 touched it in flight then marks would be very very rare

[Armagh18]

Last week he asked the question... when has any other county conceded a black card and a penalty for denial of a goal scoring opportunity? The first game on the RTÉ highlights show - yes the first one - a team (not his team) concede a penalty and a black card for denial of a goal scoring opportunity  I didn't see the game today but someone says Paudie Clifford wasn't the third man in. I don't know but would it be possible he is wrong...

I said PC wasnt the third man in. Two Tyrone men and a Kerry man were in before PC

Really??? https://twitter.com/DanielHussey2/status/1764286069896269873?t=0l8NNwu5ytw45bq5a8Qngg&s=19

Jesus there was very little in any of that. Ref should be making them play on.

[Wildweasel74]

Trailer not the ole Bomber Destro by chance? He does the same amount of crying as that lad.