Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - NAG1

#4366
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 19, 2011, 11:52:00 AM
This player cam should be interesting in the u21 games.
#4367
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 19, 2011, 10:28:50 AM
Anyone heading to Newry tomorrow? Think this game should come with a health warning especially if it is true that the management have been phoning around players from the clubs asking them to come along on saturday.
#4368
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 19, 2011, 09:47:13 AM
Why would glenariffe even take on a match like that a week before championship?
Playing a reserve team is hardly ideal prep for championship
#4369
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 17, 2011, 04:09:01 PM
oisinog

think you are talking about the rules of soccer there!
#4370
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 17, 2011, 11:51:16 AM
Some one verbally abused the ref - someone got sent off - cdall dispute who said it - cdall will appeal on mistaken identity - county will investigate

Is that not it?
#4371
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 17, 2011, 11:41:45 AM
Quote from: ruairi on August 17, 2011, 11:17:12 AM
Do you honestly think Karl would admit to something he didnt say at the possibility of missing 2 championship games. this would be because his suspension would only start after the meeting when this is resolved.

So for people to say 'everybody knew it was Neil' is just simply wrong. I know 100% FACT that it wasn't Neil. You can take that as Gospel. I am telling you it definitely wasn't Neil. Sure RM will get him in the long run. Just because he was wrong this time will just make it even worse.   

I believe 'if' there is bias against cdall from certain referees then it is only cushendalls fault for complaining at them so much. Players and managers over the past few years. Time for them to just get on with it again and shut their mouths, the way it should be.

Little odds to me Colonel in all seriousness, my point was literally on RM being accused of being biased against Cdall when this wasnt the case, I merely pointed out what I saw, I never heard who said nor did I claim to. If he was wrong on who said it then I am sure it will be resolved either way.
#4372
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 17, 2011, 11:22:16 AM
Well said Ruari

However the plot does thicken again, Karl didnt say it NmcM didnt say it narrowing down the suspects now  ;)
#4373
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 17, 2011, 10:45:41 AM
My point on it was that Ray was very close to NmcM and followed the ball pointing at him as if to say I heard that and will be back, which he was. Now if Cushendall are saying that it wasnt NmcM then they would have to say who it was and therefore that person would be liable for suspension. Thats how I see it anyway, no big conspiracy to that.

Think Oisinog has this wooden spoon out for the nieghbours  ;)
#4374
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 17, 2011, 10:13:44 AM
MIBAG was on the money re: reasons why

But max you are correct not the best place for it on here
#4375
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 17, 2011, 09:57:54 AM
I wasnt acusing your club I was saying you personally had chip on your shoulder about RM. I was at the game and saw the incident and also have been around long enough to know that this is nothing to do with personalities or some sense of revenge. As you have said doesnt do any one any favours by complaining about it on here.
#4376
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 17, 2011, 09:24:08 AM
Colonel, no disrespect either but its quite simple, your pitch wouldnt be closed if the individuals involved had been put forward for suspension by the club. The individuals would have taken the bans and not the club.
If the club prefer to have their pitch closed and not the name then thats their decision.

Serious persecution complex going on down there about RM, as I have stated before having watched alot of his games. He is pretty fair across the board and generally as with most referees county players get the benefit of the doubt most of the time. So maybe time to look at the chip on the shoulder.
#4377
General discussion / Re: Anyone have BT Vision?
August 17, 2011, 08:35:27 AM
Have it in too and agree the on demand feature is top notch, very rarely watch live tv now
signal is a bit jumpy on some of the channels so going to get a new aerial and booster pack on it.
#4378
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 17, 2011, 08:28:18 AM
The truth shall set them free.

If C'Dall and the town want to play games with the county committee then this is a saction they will have to accept.
No point whinging about it.

On the NMcM suspension, if someone else admits to it, then they serve the time, dont think there is anything more to it than that. Pretty simple.

How does this ban on home matches affect the town's early morning training regime?  ;)
#4379
Antrim / Re: ANTRIM HURLING
August 16, 2011, 04:02:48 PM
If they refused to name names the whole club would be suspended and not just home matches confiscated. The Chairman, and officers of the club would also face individual suspensions so I doubt that this is the case.

#4380
General discussion / Re: Anyone have BT Vision?
August 16, 2011, 02:54:27 PM
Very little Fermgael, just watch that you have strong enough single to be getting those channels
dont think everywhere is just quite set up for it yet