In support of the forward mark

[thewobbler]

The forward mark is universally regarded as an abomination.

Seeing as GAA board is full of shit stirrers, WUMs, professional contrarians.... If there's anyone on here in favour of the forward mark, please have your spake.

Otherwise, don't reply, please.

[JoG2]

http://gaaboard.com/board/index.php?topic=30637.msg2102845#msg2102845

[thewobbler]

Lol I was on that thread too!

Getting forgetful in my middle age

[JoG2]

Lol I was on that thread too!

Getting forgetful in my middle age

... Its definitely worth bringing up again Wobbler

[From the Bunker]

It's very quiet in here! 

[Itchy]

I'm in favour

[Champion The Wonder Horse]

Catch above head height with both feet off the ground.
And the defensive mark on the same terms.

Otherwise against it.

[Milltown Row2]

Catch above head height with both feet off the ground.
And the defensive mark on the same terms.

Otherwise against it.

Ref his feet weren't both off the ground!!! he was/wasn't inside the 45... He didn't raise his arm ref!! 

[rosnarun]

im in favour as it is now used

my fear is that some clever manager will base their whole game plan around the mark.
why bother kicking for a point when a 20 yard footpass will give you a tap over free?

[Champion The Wonder Horse]

Catch above head height with both feet off the ground.
And the defensive mark on the same terms.

Otherwise against it.

Ref his feet weren't both off the ground!!! he was/wasn't inside the 45... He didn't raise his arm ref!!

Surely you could handle that?

[Captain Obvious]

How and why was the last few Congress let go without scrapping this rule?

[Milltown Row2]

Catch above head height with both feet off the ground.
And the defensive mark on the same terms.

Otherwise against it.

Ref his feet weren't both off the ground!!! he was/wasn't inside the 45... He didn't raise his arm ref!!

Surely you could handle that?

I can handle it, its the supporters/players/management that can't

[Rossfan]

How and why was the last few Congress let go without scrapping this rule?

Presumably because such a Motion wasn't ar an gclár .

[Armagh18]

Catch above head height with both feet off the ground.
And the defensive mark on the same terms.

Otherwise against it.

That'd be easily reffed so it wouldnt!

[rosnarun]

How and why was the last few Congress let go without scrapping this rule?

Presumably because such a Motion wasn't ar an gclár .

and many people support it