The OFFICIAL Liverpool FC thread - Jurgen walks - Stallion vindicated

Started by Gabriel_Hurl, February 05, 2009, 03:47:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

brokencrossbar1

Quote from: Captain Obvious on September 17, 2018, 07:02:06 PM
Quote from: Armamike on September 17, 2018, 03:17:58 PM
Quote from: Captain Obvious on September 15, 2018, 03:13:02 PM
Tottenham probably would have got at least a point out of that game if Lloris had played.

Would doubt that.  He might have done better on the corner for the goal but he couldn't do much about Spurs getting pressed all over the pitch and getting caught on the break repeatedly. Tactically Spurs couldn't live with Liverpool in that game.  Spurs couldn't get the time they wanted to get their main men like Erickson into the game and they ended up hitting long hopeful balls.

Tottenham were error ridden throughout that game and none more so than Vorm in goal which was highlighted on the Match of the day.  A better goalkeeper wouldn't have conceded those two goals and Tottenham should have scored twice themselves because that was a clear penalty in injury and interesting it was the same ref that gave Liverpool a very soft penalty against Crystal palace.

If , ands and maybes. The result is what it is. End of story

gawa316

Quote from: Captain Obvious on September 17, 2018, 07:02:06 PM
Quote from: Armamike on September 17, 2018, 03:17:58 PM
Quote from: Captain Obvious on September 15, 2018, 03:13:02 PM
Tottenham probably would have got at least a point out of that game if Lloris had played.

Would doubt that.  He might have done better on the corner for the goal but he couldn't do much about Spurs getting pressed all over the pitch and getting caught on the break repeatedly. Tactically Spurs couldn't live with Liverpool in that game.  Spurs couldn't get the time they wanted to get their main men like Erickson into the game and they ended up hitting long hopeful balls.



Tottenham were error ridden throughout that game and none more so than Vorm in goal which was highlighted on the Match of the day.  A better goalkeeper wouldn't have conceded those two goals and Tottenham should have scored twice themselves because that was a clear penalty in injury and interesting it was the same ref that gave Liverpool a very soft penalty against Crystal palace.

Far too may 'ifs' in there but I'll throw another couple in there...if Lloris was playing, and if he had dealt with the corner better do you not agree Liverpool should've received a penalty for Vertongen holding VVD back with both arms?

Milltown Row2

Title winning form, should be over by Xmas, it had to happen some day so it's good to see Klopp take this team back to the top before going for the German job
None of us are getting out of here alive, so please stop treating yourself like an after thought. Ea

brokencrossbar1

Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 17, 2018, 07:46:42 PM
Title winning form, should be over by Xmas, it had to happen some day so it's good to see Klopp take this team back to the top before going for the German job

Ye need better bait then that maggoty auld shite ;D

Captain Obvious

Quote from: gawa316 on September 17, 2018, 07:18:10 PM
Quote from: Captain Obvious on September 17, 2018, 07:02:06 PM
Quote from: Armamike on September 17, 2018, 03:17:58 PM
Quote from: Captain Obvious on September 15, 2018, 03:13:02 PM
Tottenham probably would have got at least a point out of that game if Lloris had played.

Would doubt that.  He might have done better on the corner for the goal but he couldn't do much about Spurs getting pressed all over the pitch and getting caught on the break repeatedly. Tactically Spurs couldn't live with Liverpool in that game.  Spurs couldn't get the time they wanted to get their main men like Erickson into the game and they ended up hitting long hopeful balls.



Tottenham were error ridden throughout that game and none more so than Vorm in goal which was highlighted on the Match of the day.  A better goalkeeper wouldn't have conceded those two goals and Tottenham should have scored twice themselves because that was a clear penalty in injury and interesting it was the same ref that gave Liverpool a very soft penalty against Crystal palace.

Far too may 'ifs' in there but I'll throw another couple in there...if Lloris was playing, and if he had dealt with the corner better do you not agree Liverpool should've received a penalty for Vertongen holding VVD back with both arms?
Not one if did I use in that last post.

laoislad

Lads Captain Obvious is a bit of an eegit. Don't be wasting your time with him.
When you think you're fucked you're only about 40% fucked.

Captain Obvious

Quote from: laoislad on September 17, 2018, 08:03:59 PM
Lads Captain Obvious is a bit of an eegit. Don't be wasting your time with him.
It takes one to know one.

Minder

Quote from: laoislad on September 17, 2018, 08:03:59 PM
Lads Captain Obvious is a bit of an eegit. Don't be wasting your time with him.

Whatever happened ross4life?
"When it's too tough for them, it's just right for us"

Armamike

Quote from: Captain Obvious on September 17, 2018, 07:02:06 PM
Quote from: Armamike on September 17, 2018, 03:17:58 PM
Quote from: Captain Obvious on September 15, 2018, 03:13:02 PM
Tottenham probably would have got at least a point out of that game if Lloris had played.

Would doubt that.  He might have done better on the corner for the goal but he couldn't do much about Spurs getting pressed all over the pitch and getting caught on the break repeatedly. Tactically Spurs couldn't live with Liverpool in that game.  Spurs couldn't get the time they wanted to get their main men like Erickson into the game and they ended up hitting long hopeful balls.


Tottenham were error ridden throughout that game and none more so than Vorm in goal which was highlighted on the Match of the day.  A better goalkeeper wouldn't have conceded those two goals and Tottenham should have scored twice themselves because that was a clear penalty in injury and interesting it was the same ref that gave Liverpool a very soft penalty against Crystal palace.

Liverpool forced the errors.  You're overlooking the load of clear chances Liverpool missed.  Game should have been out of sight.  Liverpool dominated that game.
That's just, like your opinion man.

gawa316

Quote from: Captain Obvious on September 17, 2018, 08:02:46 PM
Quote from: gawa316 on September 17, 2018, 07:18:10 PM
Quote from: Captain Obvious on September 17, 2018, 07:02:06 PM
Quote from: Armamike on September 17, 2018, 03:17:58 PM
Quote from: Captain Obvious on September 15, 2018, 03:13:02 PM
Tottenham probably would have got at least a point out of that game if Lloris had played.

Would doubt that.  He might have done better on the corner for the goal but he couldn't do much about Spurs getting pressed all over the pitch and getting caught on the break repeatedly. Tactically Spurs couldn't live with Liverpool in that game.  Spurs couldn't get the time they wanted to get their main men like Erickson into the game and they ended up hitting long hopeful balls.



Tottenham were error ridden throughout that game and none more so than Vorm in goal which was highlighted on the Match of the day.  A better goalkeeper wouldn't have conceded those two goals and Tottenham should have scored twice themselves because that was a clear penalty in injury and interesting it was the same ref that gave Liverpool a very soft penalty against Crystal palace.

Far too may 'ifs' in there but I'll throw another couple in there...if Lloris was playing, and if he had dealt with the corner better do you not agree Liverpool should've received a penalty for Vertongen holding VVD back with both arms?
Not one if did I use in that last post.

Okay I thought that would've been your response. You don't know if a better goalkeeper would've saved those. Also just if they were awarded the penalty it doesn't mean it is automatically a goal...you do realize penalties can be saved or missed?

Captain Obvious

Quote from: Armamike on September 17, 2018, 08:32:30 PM
Liverpool forced the errors.  You're overlooking the load of clear chances Liverpool missed.  Game should have been out of sight.  Liverpool dominated that game.
In the after match analysis it wasn't overlooked for all Liverpool's dominance of the game only two goals was scored and both were gifts from a keeper that only played because Lloris was injured.

Quote from: gawa316 on September 17, 2018, 08:57:03 PM

Okay I thought that would've been your response. You don't know if a better goalkeeper would've saved those. Also just if they were awarded the penalty it doesn't mean it is automatically a goal...you do realize penalties can be saved or missed?
I know they were very bad errors by a replacement goalkeeper. Two errors on the first goal and the second goal he let the ball through his fingers. We aren't to know on the penalty because that referee wasn't as quick to point to the spot as he was for the Liverpool Crystal palace match a month ago.






laoislad

Liverpool beat Spurs, they've won 5 games from 5, conceding only twice. Get over it.
When you think you're fucked you're only about 40% fucked.

Milltown Row2

None of us are getting out of here alive, so please stop treating yourself like an after thought. Ea

Boycey

A simple yeah, maybe if Lloris had of being playing it might have been different would have sufficed either..After all that's what good keepers do, make the difference :)

johnnycool