Quote from: Milltown Row2 on April 01, 2024, 03:49:59 PMQuote from: nrico2006 on April 01, 2024, 02:13:11 PMQuote from: Derryman forever on April 01, 2024, 02:00:38 PMQuote from: cornerback on April 01, 2024, 01:48:27 PMQuote from: Derryman forever on April 01, 2024, 01:33:43 PMQuote from: cornerback on April 01, 2024, 01:20:29 PMhttps://x.com/so_92/status/1774758687636070636?s=46&t=F_sQ_3viFZ6zidQYNagDEA
Good angle to show that Lane didn't see the incident at the time. Turn round due to the crowd's reaction
So he turned around, observed a player lying on the ground and an opponent standing over him, but didn't think to stop play to adjudicate.
That seems like good refereeing.
So are you saying you want the referee to stop play every time that situation arises?
So a team on the attack in the final minutes of a game, a player on the defending hits the ground, the crowd reacts, referee stops play, consults all his other officials, nobody seen anything. Play restarts with a free to the attacking team which they aren't allowed to score from and the defending team are now set with everyone back and marking their opponents.
Fair point.
But is he not in communication with his supporting officials, i.e. when a linesman witnesses an actual legitimate assault/incident and informs the referee of the incident. It seemed like the linesman saw that happen yesterday.
Jesus this is nauseating!!
Linesmen do NOT HAVE THE POWER to award a free.
At that point he rest of your point is pointless
I didn't say that linesmen have that power, you seem to like to make things up. I was talking about the specific incident yesterday that ultimately led to the equaliser, where I would have thought the linesman could or should have alerted the ref about the foul by Fenton.