Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Rossfan

#20581
Quote from: dublinfella on March 28, 2007, 08:41:07 PM

in 2005 SDCC said it would cost €4m to finish the project.


HA HA HA HA HA HA HA ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Spin me good man. €4m my arse  HA ha ha ha

LANSDOWNE 50,000 EST COST €365M
Talladome      6,000   - €365m divide by 9 = €40m.
#20582
Maybe less assinine training trying to get lads fit to run marathons or march to Moscow and back instead of concentrating on  quality training and fitness to play football/hurling.
Are you listening Maughan/Tomkins/Carr/Loughnane etc
#20583
Quote from: dublinfella on March 28, 2007, 04:17:46 PM
How much of an investment towards the total cost of the operation have Sham Rovs actually staked?

The figure mentioned of SRFC's financial contribution to date is €2m

Of which €1.5 or €1.9m -came from Lotto Grants.
And guess what GAA lads - something to really piss you off - the Council had to pay almost €1.5m to get the lease back !!!!!! :( :( (Seriously  source- my "mole" in the SD Council.)
So the Lotto pays for 75 or 95% of the work done;then they get €1.5m to get off the stage and then they get a free Stadium which is estimated will cost €11m. I suspect with the Irish and Government way of doing things that will be about €15m+ before this saga is over.
#20584
Quote from: dublinfella on March 26, 2007, 08:30:34 PM

the land was to be given back to SDCC in return for completion of the stadium. is the PR chorus denying this now? Are you claiming Shamrock Rovers never owned the site? ........
and Rovers sold f**k all. .... you think the club itself sold the ground.
. Rossfan, you clearly arent stupid, how can you be so wrong on this basic tenent of the case after all the press this week?

ONE -SDCC recovered the LEASE on the site they gave a limited company who owned Shams to build a Stadium.They took it back because the thing had stalled for years.
SDCC then went through the Local Authority version of planning to complete the Stadium. This entailed seeking submissions from the public and making a decision in light of the submissions. The end result was the Councillors agreed with the GAA submission that the Free Municipal Stadium should also include the major sport of Gaelic Games. Then enter the Kerry B*******s.
THREE - Shams or their owners at the time SOLD the Milltown lands for money which wasnt put back into the game - unlike the GAA sales you have a problem with.
FOUR - Thanks for the complement - I wish I could return it but you believe an incorrect version of the facts and as for what you read in papers -- FFS man - wise up.
TWO-Shamrock NEVER OWNED THE LAND IN TALLAGHT - they got a lease of a site to build a Stadium.
#20585
Quote from: dublinfella on March 26, 2007, 05:18:37 PM
bottlethrower,  i dont live on the internet. not getting a reply immediatly doenst mean im hiding, its just .

Hardy, Rovers have a deal. . They give SDCC the land,

More lying crap -- the land belongs and has for years to Sth Dublin county Council.
Shams SOLD thier land back in the 1980s.
GET OFF THE STAGE YA SPOOFER
#20586
GAA Discussion / Re: Dublin v Fermanagh
March 24, 2007, 08:46:18 PM
About 1-9 to 0-3  - not for Fermanagh
#20587
GAA Discussion / Re: keep soccer in croker!!!
March 24, 2007, 08:31:05 PM
It was the best advert for hurling and football I've seen for many a year  ;)
#20588
Quote from: dublinfella on March 23, 2007, 01:54:30 PM

....his point on rathcoole is central to the ministers stance.his attitude has always been that the gaa have been given land nearby  .....

For F *** sake cut the crap.
The Dublin County Board BOUGHT land near Rathcoole from the County Council.
PLEASE NOTE B O U G H T[/b] not G I V E N.
I know thats a foreign concept to a soccer eejit like Roversfella.
I understand there is no access to these lands till the Council build a road but they are having trouble doing so as it is intended that the same road will give access to lands they have earmarked for a Traveller Site.
#20589
Maybe the GAA should stop paying the rest of the debt and wait till the Minister for Sport rides to the rescue. ;D :D
#20590
Quote from: dublinfella on March 22, 2007, 08:41:45 PM
Quote from: Rossfan on March 22, 2007, 08:33:12 PM
Quote from: dublinfella on March 22, 2007, 08:29:03 PM
[

. however .... rugby, underage and womens gaelic games are welcome.

Since when and says who? other than you of course  :D ;D ;D :D

the minister, the chairman of rovers, even Kennedy from TD

In other words Anybody except the landowners  - (i.e the local Council not Shamrock Beggers >:(
#20591
Quote from: dublinfella on March 22, 2007, 08:29:03 PM
[

. however .... rugby, underage and womens gaelic games are welcome.

Since when and says who? other than you of course  :D ;D ;D :D
#20592
Ya half baked eejit - Liam's comments were more than likely drefted a week ago.
#20593
Judgement has "been reserved" - which I think usually means the Judge wants to go away and think about it and probably read up on the Law in this area.
A decision will be given "in due course" no doubt.
#20594
Quote from: dublinfella on March 20, 2007, 12:29:30 PM



the GAA never partook in the public consultation. 

Absolute and utter LIE .
I have gone to the trouble of reading the Sth Dublin Council Minutes if their meeting of December 2005.
There's a big long report on the submissions received as part of the PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROCESS.
It refers to the submissions of Dublin Co Board and Cumann Tomás Dáibhis who both stated that a Municipal Stadium should be available for Gaelic Games also.
Please stop lying on this saga - opinions are one thing and are to be respected but untruths are another matter.
#20595
Excellent article as always from TH.
I think Mr Humphries makes my points much better than I ever could.As for "Dublin"fella(Maybe Shamsfella be more apt???) when are you going to stop spoofing that Shamrock Rovers put money into  the Stadium?