Maughtan and from Feb 2016 an unemployed John O'Mahony to assist him is just the ticket for the Rhus.
Sure what could possibly go wrong
Sure what could possibly go wrong
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Il Bomber Destro on September 28, 2015, 09:59:33 PMAnd would you also just go away?Quote from: time ticking away on September 28, 2015, 09:49:14 PM
Bomber if we all agreed with you would you just stop
Yes.
Quote from: Farrandeelin on September 28, 2015, 05:22:43 PMThe County team were in Round 4b Qualifier action August weekend.
How are Sligo 'only' at quarter final stage?
Quote from: T Fearon on September 27, 2015, 08:45:49 AMDon't forget a certain chap called Elliott or the Archbigot Campbell .
Armaghmaniac the Unionism which opposes everything Irish is now the minuscule TUV.
Quote from: seafoid on September 25, 2015, 03:19:11 AMWouldn't it just.Quote from: Syferus on September 25, 2015, 02:53:38 AMLe cunamh De. the last fallow period lasted 32 years so early days yet.Quote from: seafoid on September 25, 2015, 01:37:57 AM
Derry are serial underperformers. Is this likely to change?
Galway are serial underperformers. Is this likely to change?
It would be nice to have Galway and Ros putting MGHU under pressure, wouldn't it ?
Quote from: nrico2006 on September 25, 2015, 11:14:02 AMSo.... They all count in a game.Quote from: Shrewdness on September 25, 2015, 11:12:29 AM
Cillian O'Connor deserves the award for the simple reason that he scored more than anyone else. Quigley scored his total in 6 games, whereas O'Connor only had 5 games...However, that doesn't take away from the fact that Quigley had a great year.
I disagree. This award simply rewards the person who ends up scoring the most frees.
Quote from: Fear ón Srath Bán on September 24, 2015, 09:39:31 PMTypical Tymoanie - can't accept you lostQuote from: Rossfan on September 24, 2015, 09:01:48 PMQuote from: mrhardyannual on September 24, 2015, 05:36:56 PMThanks for proving me right myh
When shine is intransitive (has no direct object), the past tense is shone. When shine is transitive (takes a direct object), the past tense is shined.
Another way of looking at it is that when the subject of the verb is shiny, the past tense is shone. When the object of the verb is shiny, the past tense is shined.
"The table shone after I shined it."
No, you're actually WRONG: but by all means allow a fellow #ignorantpedant to peddle your pedantic myth.
Quote from: mrhardyannual on September 24, 2015, 05:36:56 PMThanks for proving me right myh
When shine is intransitive (has no direct object), the past tense is shone. When shine is transitive (takes a direct object), the past tense is shined.
Another way of looking at it is that when the subject of the verb is shiny, the past tense is shone. When the object of the verb is shiny, the past tense is shined.
"The table shone after I shined it."