gaaboard.com

Non GAA Discussion => General discussion => Topic started by: Farrandeelin on March 22, 2017, 05:24:36 PM

Title: Terror attack in London
Post by: Farrandeelin on March 22, 2017, 05:24:36 PM
Lucky 'only' one dead it seems.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Esmarelda on March 22, 2017, 05:27:31 PM
Two according to Sky News.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: brokencrossbar1 on March 22, 2017, 05:34:48 PM
Terror incident?  Guy with a knife?  Bullshit...a nutjob either thinking he is someone or a domestic violence gone crazy.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Dougal Maguire on March 22, 2017, 05:45:49 PM
That has to be the most uninformed message ever posted on this board
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Tubberman on March 22, 2017, 05:47:37 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on March 22, 2017, 05:34:48 PM
Terror incident?  Guy with a knife?  Bullshit...a nutjob either thinking he is someone or a domestic violence gone crazy.

Freedom fighter?
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: stew on March 22, 2017, 05:53:19 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on March 22, 2017, 05:34:48 PM
Terror incident?  Guy with a knife?  Bullshit...a nutjob either thinking he is someone or a domestic violence gone crazy.
[/quote

I hope you are on the batter because that was one dreadful effort.

Gut says Radical Islamic Terrorists, has all the hallmarks, also the anniversary of the Brussels attack but best to sit back and wait to hear with the official verdict is, mind you it is the brits so who knows what they will say.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: seafoid on March 22, 2017, 06:05:01 PM
Police officer dead
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: seafoid on March 22, 2017, 06:08:59 PM
4 dead now per the Guardian
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: stew on March 22, 2017, 06:14:18 PM
Quote from: seafoid on March 22, 2017, 06:08:59 PM
4 dead now per the Guardian

It takes a real man to plough into schoolkids and women in a car, what are these animals on that they can destroy human beings with such impunity?
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2017, 07:13:21 PM
Those "known Islamic" c***ts should all be sent packing to either a country more suited to their ideology or to Paradise with a bullet in the back of the head.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: J70 on March 22, 2017, 07:35:22 PM
Quote from: stew on March 22, 2017, 06:14:18 PM
Quote from: seafoid on March 22, 2017, 06:08:59 PM
4 dead now per the Guardian

It takes a real man to plough into schoolkids and women in a car, what are these animals on that they can destroy human beings with such impunity?


Twisted, deluded half-wits striking a blow for a figment of their imagination.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: GetOverTheBar on March 22, 2017, 08:52:06 PM
I'm afraid things like this are going to become more and more 'the norm'. This is just the next phase.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: vallankumous on March 22, 2017, 09:05:06 PM
Quote from: GetOverTheBar on March 22, 2017, 08:52:06 PM
I'm afraid things like this are going to become more and more 'the norm'. This is just the next phase.

You'll fing they're becoming less and less regular.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Never beat the deeler on March 22, 2017, 09:28:27 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2017, 07:13:21 PM
Those "known Islamic" c***ts should all be sent packing to either a country more suited to their ideology or to Paradise with a bullet in the back of the head.

I hope this is satire.
Just because you know someone is Islamic, doesn't mean you should shoot them in the head.

RIP to the four people that lost their lives.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: GetOverTheBar on March 22, 2017, 09:32:22 PM
Quote from: vallankumous on March 22, 2017, 09:05:06 PM
Quote from: GetOverTheBar on March 22, 2017, 08:52:06 PM
I'm afraid things like this are going to become more and more 'the norm'. This is just the next phase.

You'll fing they're becoming less and less regular.

I meant over a generation, not six months.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: stew on March 22, 2017, 09:33:51 PM
Quote from: Never beat the deeler on March 22, 2017, 09:28:27 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2017, 07:13:21 PM
Those "known Islamic" c***ts should all be sent packing to either a country more suited to their ideology or to Paradise with a bullet in the back of the head.

I hope this is satire.
Just because you know someone is Islamic, doesn't mean you should shoot them in the head.

RIP to the four people that lost their lives.

I am assuming he means the Islamic c***ts that are doing damage and not all Muslims.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2017, 09:38:10 PM
Quote from: stew on March 22, 2017, 09:33:51 PM
Quote from: Never beat the deeler on March 22, 2017, 09:28:27 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2017, 07:13:21 PM
Those "known Islamic" c***ts should all be sent packing to either a country more suited to their ideology or to Paradise with a bullet in the back of the head.

I hope this is satire.
Just because you know someone is Islamic, doesn't mean you should shoot them in the head.

RIP to the four people that lost their lives.

I am assuming he means the Islamic c***ts that are doing damage and not all Muslims.
Poor spelling on my part. Exchange for "islamist". Sentiment remains.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Tubberman on March 22, 2017, 10:44:44 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2017, 09:38:10 PM
Quote from: stew on March 22, 2017, 09:33:51 PM
Quote from: Never beat the deeler on March 22, 2017, 09:28:27 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2017, 07:13:21 PM
Those "known Islamic" c***ts should all be sent packing to either a country more suited to their ideology or to Paradise with a bullet in the back of the head.

I hope this is satire.
Just because you know someone is Islamic, doesn't mean you should shoot them in the head.

RIP to the four people that lost their lives.

I am assuming he means the Islamic c***ts that are doing damage and not all Muslims.
Poor spelling on my part. Exchange for "islamist". Sentiment remains.

Just as well they didn't take that approach with Irish people when IRA were killing many more.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: stew on March 22, 2017, 11:05:07 PM
Quote from: Tubberman on March 22, 2017, 10:44:44 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2017, 09:38:10 PM
Quote from: stew on March 22, 2017, 09:33:51 PM
Quote from: Never beat the deeler on March 22, 2017, 09:28:27 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2017, 07:13:21 PM
Those "known Islamic" c***ts should all be sent packing to either a country more suited to their ideology or to Paradise with a bullet in the back of the head.

I hope this is satire.
Just because you know someone is Islamic, doesn't mean you should shoot them in the head.

RIP to the four people that lost their lives.

I am assuming he means the Islamic c***ts that are doing damage and not all Muslims.
Poor spelling on my part. Exchange for "islamist". Sentiment remains.

Just as well they didn't take that approach with Irish people when IRA were killing many more.

These bastards are only getting warmed up, watch this space, be careful what you wish for and not one IRA man tried to drive over kids with a car or lop off a pastors head.

But then again, maybe not, they are the JV squad after all!  :o
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: trileacman on March 22, 2017, 11:55:42 PM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th that of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..." Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

That's the world Hardy. It's not going to change or begin acting rationally anytime soon, maybe it never will.

The real question is now that you've realised the ignorance and stupidity of modern society how do you effectively drown it out so it doesn't drive you mad? That's the bit I'm struggling with at the minute.

Or maybe I've just gone mad.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: AZOffaly on March 23, 2017, 12:04:42 AM
Ignore it, and watch the sports channels instead. Most importantly don't read or listen to opinion pieces, especially those you agree with.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: sid waddell on March 23, 2017, 12:51:36 AM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th that of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..." Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

I will never, ever again travel in a car after reading that.

Frankly, anybody who travels in a car is nuts. 

In fact, I'm never going to leave the house again, as even if I don't travel in a car and choose to walk or take public transport, I could still be hit by one.

The risk to my life just isn't worth it.

But that leaves me with the risk of electrocution, carbon monoxide poisoning, dying in a fire, falling down the stairs, starvation, and any amount of other risks to my life.

I just don't know what to do!
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Rossfan on March 23, 2017, 01:26:09 AM
Just go watch Offaly games. ;D
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: seafoid on March 23, 2017, 05:50:58 AM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th that of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..." Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.
Many people are not good at maths . They don't put things in context. . You are far more likely to die of MRSA infection in a local hospital. But that doesn't suit political framing. 
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: johnneycool on March 23, 2017, 08:53:02 AM
Quote from: stew on March 22, 2017, 11:05:07 PM
Quote from: Tubberman on March 22, 2017, 10:44:44 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2017, 09:38:10 PM
Quote from: stew on March 22, 2017, 09:33:51 PM
Quote from: Never beat the deeler on March 22, 2017, 09:28:27 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2017, 07:13:21 PM
Those "known Islamic" c***ts should all be sent packing to either a country more suited to their ideology or to Paradise with a bullet in the back of the head.

I hope this is satire.
Just because you know someone is Islamic, doesn't mean you should shoot them in the head.

RIP to the four people that lost their lives.

I am assuming he means the Islamic c***ts that are doing damage and not all Muslims.
Poor spelling on my part. Exchange for "islamist". Sentiment remains.

Just as well they didn't take that approach with Irish people when IRA were killing many more.

These b**tards are only getting warmed up, watch this space, be careful what you wish for and not one IRA man tried to drive over kids with a car or lop off a pastors head.

But then again, maybe not, they are the JV squad after all!  :o

But is it OK for the likes of Obama, May and Co to send drones over to Syria, Afghanistan and kill indiscriminately their fellow Muslim brothers?

This lad may have been a nut job alright, but ask yourself how easy would it have been to radicalise him for the deeds done on fellow Muslims by the bastions of world peace here in the West?

I don't buy this argument that these extremists just don't like the opulent Western lifestyle and things like this don't happen in a vacuum.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: seafoid on March 23, 2017, 08:57:58 AM


   https://www.ft.com/content/a9cf69ac-0f87-11e7-a88c-50ba212dce4d

   the principal message from parliamentarians is expected to be one of defiance and an insistence that Britain's democracy will not be disrupted.Mrs May insisted "the forces of evil" would never be allowed "to drive us apart" as she addressed the country from outside Number 10 on Wednesday night.


Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Taylor on March 23, 2017, 09:31:48 AM
This event suits the current media agenda and will ensure the scaremongering continues.

Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: macdanger2 on March 23, 2017, 09:40:24 AM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th that of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..." Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

Ah ffs lads, how are going to ratchet up "defence" spending with that sort of attitude. F*cking bleeding heart snowflakes
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: AZOffaly on March 23, 2017, 10:44:05 AM
Quote from: Rossfan on March 23, 2017, 01:26:09 AM
Just go watch Offaly games. ;D
?
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: seafoid on March 23, 2017, 11:57:23 AM
Quote from: AZOffaly on March 23, 2017, 10:44:05 AM
Quote from: Rossfan on March 23, 2017, 01:26:09 AM
Just go watch Offaly games. ;D
?
Offaly are terrible
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: winghalfun on March 23, 2017, 12:12:14 PM
QuoteFewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

Well said Hardy.  Was just expressing the same sentiment (not as articulately though) to the wife this morning as the wall to wall coverage continued.

As I type this here we go again on Talkbalk.  "How will London change after yesterday's terrorist attack?"  FFS playing Streets Of London as the opening song.

Pity the Queen Mother wasn't still alive to get her out in the rubble to keep the spirits up.

And just to clarify - what happened was tragic, shocking, and brutal and everyone killed or injured deserves all our thoughts and prayers.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: stew on March 23, 2017, 01:42:02 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Well said screen about the loss, it is heartbreaking for all involved.

Its not scaremongering screen it is a statistical fact, got frig all to do with Fox news, you left wing lads need to face reality and by the way, the brits are looking at arming specialist cops that protect places such as Parliament with personal guns.

I understand that you are emotional but what has Fox news got to do with me and what has the dozens of people killed by murderers using guns yesterday in America got to do with a knifing Radical Islamic terrorist in London wielding two knives??????

These animals are not going to stop anytime soon, if you cannot see that you are a fool, I am being a realist not scaremongering kid!
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Farrandeelin on March 23, 2017, 01:59:22 PM
I see (might be fake news) up on Facebook that there was an 'Islam is Superior' march through London one of the days. Hardly yesterday given what happened.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: whitey on March 23, 2017, 02:20:38 PM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

What a pile of nonsense.......how many would have been killed if the plot to hijack the airlines hadnt been foiled back in 2006.

Much (but not all) of the terrorism has been perpertated by individuals (and their offspring)  who have been allowed/invited into the UK under the Labour Partys multicultural wet dream
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: sid waddell on March 23, 2017, 02:29:25 PM
Quote from: stew on March 23, 2017, 01:42:02 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Well said screen about the loss, it is heartbreaking for all involved.

Its not scaremongering screen it is a statistical fact, got frig all to do with Fox news, you left wing lads need to face reality and by the way, the brits are looking at arming specialist cops that protect places such as Parliament with personal guns.

I understand that you are emotional but what has Fox news got to do with me and what has the dozens of people killed by murderers using guns yesterday in America got to do with a knifing Radical Islamic terrorist in London wielding two knives??????

These animals are not going to stop anytime soon, if you cannot see that you are a fool, I am being a realist not scaremongering kid!
The reality, which you are only too happy to dismiss as it doesn't suit your agenda, is that Islamist terrorism is a very minor problem in the grand scheme of things and presents absolutely no existential threat whatsoever to western societies or their way of life.

The real threat to western societies and their way of life comes from gullible fools like yourself, who use these type of incidents to stoke fear and division against ethnic minorities. It comes from morons like Trump, Le Pen, Farage and right-wing media, who act as ISIS's chief propagandists every time they speak or write another bullshit headline.

The gas thing is that some of you morons even claim to be fans of Martin McGuinness, who stood squarely against that kind of vilification.

To call such people confused is a charitable description.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: maddog on March 23, 2017, 02:43:24 PM
Quote from: whitey on March 23, 2017, 02:20:38 PM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

What a pile of nonsense.......how many would have been killed if the plot to hijack the airlines hadnt been foiled back in 2006.

Much (but not all) of the terrorism has been perpertated by individuals (and their offspring)  who have been allowed/invited into the UK under the Labour Partys multicultural wet dream

Apart from Lockerbie 7/7 was the biggest attack and that was carried out by 3 men born in UK  the 4th bomber was born in Jamaica all long before phoney Tony took the reigns. Think the 2 guys that killed Lee rigby were British born of Nigerian descent.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: maddog on March 23, 2017, 03:41:46 PM
Seems this guy was a 52 year old born in Kent. Khalid Masood.

Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: J70 on March 23, 2017, 05:08:52 PM
Quote from: whitey on March 23, 2017, 02:20:38 PM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

What a pile of nonsense.......how many would have been killed if the plot to hijack the airlines hadnt been foiled back in 2006.

Much (but not all) of the terrorism has been perpertated by individuals (and their offspring)  who have been allowed/invited into the UK under the Labour Partys multicultural wet dream

And how many people would be alive if there was decent health service? How many would be alive if a ban on texting while driving was properly enforced or the real dangers even recognized by all drivers? How many would be alive if people didn't drive drunk?

The point about risk and perspective is absolutely valid.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: thebuzz on March 23, 2017, 05:36:39 PM
Quote from: J70 on March 23, 2017, 05:08:52 PM
Quote from: whitey on March 23, 2017, 02:20:38 PM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

What a pile of nonsense.......how many would have been killed if the plot to hijack the airlines hadnt been foiled back in 2006.

Much (but not all) of the terrorism has been perpertated by individuals (and their offspring)  who have been allowed/invited into the UK under the Labour Partys multicultural wet dream

And how many people would be alive if there was decent health service? How many would be alive if a ban on texting while driving was properly enforced or the real dangers even recognized by all drivers? How many would be alive if people didn't drive drunk?

The point about risk and perspective is absolutely valid.

The point is that no one sets out to deliberately kill people by not having a decent health service. No one (usually) sets out to kill people by crashing a car. This guy deliberately murdered those people so it's automatically viewed in a different perspective.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: sid waddell on March 23, 2017, 06:03:34 PM
Quote from: thebuzz on March 23, 2017, 05:36:39 PM
Quote from: J70 on March 23, 2017, 05:08:52 PM
Quote from: whitey on March 23, 2017, 02:20:38 PM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

What a pile of nonsense.......how many would have been killed if the plot to hijack the airlines hadnt been foiled back in 2006.

Much (but not all) of the terrorism has been perpertated by individuals (and their offspring)  who have been allowed/invited into the UK under the Labour Partys multicultural wet dream

And how many people would be alive if there was decent health service? How many would be alive if a ban on texting while driving was properly enforced or the real dangers even recognized by all drivers? How many would be alive if people didn't drive drunk?

The point about risk and perspective is absolutely valid.

The point is that no one sets out to deliberately kill people by not having a decent health service. No one (usually) sets out to kill people by crashing a car. This guy deliberately murdered those people so it's automatically viewed in a different perspective.

The ridiculous, over the top, non-stop hysterical media coverage given to this type of terrorism is entirely disproportionate to the threat it poses.

And it's encouraging it, if anything.

The political and media coverage given to the so called "threat" of immigration and particularly Islamic immigration throughout the western world is an utter nonsense and a fraud which seeks to manufacture a massive problem which doesn't exist. But make enough people think something exists and you might just manufacture a real problem. That's what happening. And that problem isn't immigration. It's the demonisation and vilification of immigrants. Those that claim a "massive problem", generally are the massive problem.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: stew on March 23, 2017, 06:16:27 PM
Quote from: J70 on March 23, 2017, 05:08:52 PM
Quote from: whitey on March 23, 2017, 02:20:38 PM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

What a pile of nonsense.......how many would have been killed if the plot to hijack the airlines hadnt been foiled back in 2006.

Much (but not all) of the terrorism has been perpertated by individuals (and their offspring)  who have been allowed/invited into the UK under the Labour Partys multicultural wet dream

And how many people would be alive if there was decent health service? How many would be alive if a ban on texting while driving was properly enforced or the real dangers even recognized by all drivers? How many would be alive if people didn't drive drunk?

The point about risk and perspective is absolutely valid.

Acknowledge the fact that there is an element among the Muslim faithful that is hell bent on eradicating the infidels worldwide and stop with the stupid whataboutery, I am sick and tired of cowards hiding behind glorified  terms like ' risk and perspective' Terms mean f**k all, action and shared intelligence means everything, it is time to hunt these c***ts down and bury them, thank you Merkel and Obama, you two c***ts are the liberal faces that created this Muslim monster, time to stop moddycoddling these f**kers and start prosecuting them!
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Rossfan on March 23, 2017, 06:50:19 PM
I think you'll find non stop US backing of the rogue State of Israel and US and British illegal invasion of the sovereign state of Iraq, illegal and immoral invasions and bombings and mass murder of civilians in Libya, Syria and Afghanistan
Just might have a little but of something to do with it.
Not to mention arming ISIS.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: whitey on March 23, 2017, 06:50:31 PM
Quote from: J70 on March 23, 2017, 05:08:52 PM
Quote from: whitey on March 23, 2017, 02:20:38 PM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

What a pile of nonsense.......how many would have been killed if the plot to hijack the airlines hadnt been foiled back in 2006.

Much (but not all) of the terrorism has been perpertated by individuals (and their offspring)  who have been allowed/invited into the UK under the Labour Partys multicultural wet dream

And how many people would be alive if there was decent health service? How many would be alive if a ban on texting while driving was properly enforced or the real dangers even recognized by all drivers? How many would be alive if people didn't drive drunk?

The point about risk and perspective is absolutely valid.

Completely false equivalence

Terrorist actions typically backed by, or based on some ideology that is counter to the wellbeing and consent of the majority of the the citizenry.  Someone who accidentally crashes a car has no agenda or ideology that they could be coaxed or persuaded out of
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: stew on March 23, 2017, 07:12:59 PM
Quote from: Rossfan on March 23, 2017, 06:50:19 PM
I think you'll find non stop US backing of the rogue State of Israel and US and British illegal invasion of the sovereign state of Iraq, illegal and immoral invasions and bombings and mass murder of civilians in Libya, Syria and Afghanistan
Just might have a little but of something to do with it.
Not to mention arming ISIS.

Correct on all fronts, as for arming Isis, sure according to your hero Obama they are the JV squad, you lot blame the right for everything and are accountable for.......... You guessed it.


What about the immoral invasion of the USA by persons not eligible by their laws  to be there, do they count????

No one doctrine is fully right, the left is a lot less right at this juncture, President Saunders should be handing you liberals all golden handouts by now but no, you had to have Clinton, thanks for f**k all liberals!

Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: whitey on March 23, 2017, 07:25:44 PM
Quote from: Rossfan on March 23, 2017, 06:50:19 PM
I think you'll find non stop US backing of the rogue State of Israel and US and British illegal invasion of the sovereign state of Iraq, illegal and immoral invasions and bombings and mass murder of civilians in Libya, Syria and Afghanistan
Just might have a little but of something to do with it.
Not to mention arming ISIS.

That's fair enough, but at what point do we stop justifying why these people are attacking us

Osama Bin Laden justified the 9/11 attacks by stating theat infidels should not be on sacred soil...ie Saudi Arabia
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: stew on March 23, 2017, 07:27:37 PM
Quote from: sid waddell on March 23, 2017, 06:03:34 PM
Quote from: thebuzz on March 23, 2017, 05:36:39 PM
Quote from: J70 on March 23, 2017, 05:08:52 PM
Quote from: whitey on March 23, 2017, 02:20:38 PM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

What a pile of nonsense.......how many would have been killed if the plot to hijack the airlines hadnt been foiled back in 2006.

Much (but not all) of the terrorism has been perpertated by individuals (and their offspring)  who have been allowed/invited into the UK under the Labour Partys multicultural wet dream

And how many people would be alive if there was decent health service? How many would be alive if a ban on texting while driving was properly enforced or the real dangers even recognized by all drivers? How many would be alive if people didn't drive drunk?

The point about risk and perspective is absolutely valid.

The point is that no one sets out to deliberately kill people by not having a decent health service. No one (usually) sets out to kill people by crashing a car. This guy deliberately murdered those people so it's automatically viewed in a different perspective.

The ridiculous, over the top, non-stop hysterical media coverage given to this type of terrorism is entirely disproportionate to the threat it poses.

And it's encouraging it, if anything.

The political and media coverage given to the so called "threat" of immigration and particularly Islamic immigration throughout the western world is an utter nonsense and a fraud which seeks to manufacture a massive problem which doesn't exist. But make enough people think something exists and you might just manufacture a real problem. That's what happening. And that problem isn't immigration. It's the demonisation and vilification of immigrants. Those that claim a "massive problem", generally are the massive problem.

Sid, please go live in the Muslim world, take ten thousand of your closest friends with you and see what happens you absolute useless apologist you.

Look at the rape figures in Scandinavia, look at what happene
Quote
d when Merkel parted her legs and let some of these extremist  c***ts flow in like wine!

I am living beside a gaggle of syria refugees, I used to live in the apartment they now live in, they are drunken, loud, obnoxious arseholes that stink the place up and throw their shit everywhere, they hold phone calls in the hallway at all hours waking the rest of us up, they got to bed around four, I wake the c***ts up at six every morning by knocking the door prior to me going to work, Obama is to blame for this forced

Ask the French if there is a problem, ask the Belgians, you make me sick siddie, your head is squarely up your ass at this juncture, remember the statement where the Muslims and liberals news outlets blamed instances of attempted/rape cases on the fact these c***ts were not used to seeing women in skirts and halter tops etc!

I hope you have it in you to move to the middle east, take your family/friends with you for a year and if you come back with the same opinion I will accept it as fact, the fact is you are owned by the left, the same left who want cheap labour worldwide and who fawn over foreign nationals for future votes, you make me sick siddy!



Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: stew on March 23, 2017, 07:29:50 PM
Quote from: whitey on March 23, 2017, 07:25:44 PM
Quote from: Rossfan on March 23, 2017, 06:50:19 PM
I think you'll find non stop US backing of the rogue State of Israel and US and British illegal invasion of the sovereign state of Iraq, illegal and immoral invasions and bombings and mass murder of civilians in Libya, Syria and Afghanistan
Just might have a little but of something to do with it.
Not to mention arming ISIS.

That's fair enough, but at what point do we stop justifying why these people are attacking us

Osama Bin Laden justified the 9/11 attacks by stating theat infidels should not be on sacred soil...ie Saudi Arabia

Not good enough, sure didnt a fair amount of Palestinian people want the israelis slash Jewish people worldwide exterminated! Not a question, fact!
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Arthur_Friend on March 23, 2017, 08:40:00 PM
Quote from: stew on March 23, 2017, 07:29:50 PM
Quote from: whitey on March 23, 2017, 07:25:44 PM
Quote from: Rossfan on March 23, 2017, 06:50:19 PM
I think you'll find non stop US backing of the rogue State of Israel and US and British illegal invasion of the sovereign state of Iraq, illegal and immoral invasions and bombings and mass murder of civilians in Libya, Syria and Afghanistan
Just might have a little but of something to do with it.
Not to mention arming ISIS.

That's fair enough, but at what point do we stop justifying why these people are attacking us

Osama Bin Laden justified the 9/11 attacks by stating theat infidels should not be on sacred soil...ie Saudi Arabia

Not good enough, sure didnt a fair amount of Palestinian people want the israelis slash Jewish people worldwide exterminated! Not a question, fact!

Can you provide a figure to 'fair amount' and provide a source for your claim?
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: seafoid on March 23, 2017, 08:40:51 PM
Whitey, alcoholism or unacceptable levels of risk taking could be described in similar terms to a political ideology that people will not be swayed from. Drink driving and dangerous driving kill many multiples of lone wolf terrorist attacks and are accepted as par for the course. Smoking is the sexy killer, of course. 
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: lawnseed on March 23, 2017, 09:00:04 PM
As the mans says "you'll play with the cat til she scrabes you"

Britain has been playing too much for her own good. They should be grateful to martin mcguinness that its only isis that's giving them a headache   
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: sid waddell on March 23, 2017, 09:13:42 PM
Quote from: stew on March 23, 2017, 07:27:37 PM
Quote from: sid waddell on March 23, 2017, 06:03:34 PM
Quote from: thebuzz on March 23, 2017, 05:36:39 PM
Quote from: J70 on March 23, 2017, 05:08:52 PM
Quote from: whitey on March 23, 2017, 02:20:38 PM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

What a pile of nonsense.......how many would have been killed if the plot to hijack the airlines hadnt been foiled back in 2006.

Much (but not all) of the terrorism has been perpertated by individuals (and their offspring)  who have been allowed/invited into the UK under the Labour Partys multicultural wet dream

And how many people would be alive if there was decent health service? How many would be alive if a ban on texting while driving was properly enforced or the real dangers even recognized by all drivers? How many would be alive if people didn't drive drunk?

The point about risk and perspective is absolutely valid.

The point is that no one sets out to deliberately kill people by not having a decent health service. No one (usually) sets out to kill people by crashing a car. This guy deliberately murdered those people so it's automatically viewed in a different perspective.

The ridiculous, over the top, non-stop hysterical media coverage given to this type of terrorism is entirely disproportionate to the threat it poses.

And it's encouraging it, if anything.

The political and media coverage given to the so called "threat" of immigration and particularly Islamic immigration throughout the western world is an utter nonsense and a fraud which seeks to manufacture a massive problem which doesn't exist. But make enough people think something exists and you might just manufacture a real problem. That's what happening. And that problem isn't immigration. It's the demonisation and vilification of immigrants. Those that claim a "massive problem", generally are the massive problem.

Sid, please go live in the Muslim world, take ten thousand of your closest friends with you and see what happens you absolute useless apologist you.

Look at the rape figures in Scandinavia, look at what happene
Quote
d when Merkel parted her legs and let some of these extremist  c***ts flow in like wine!

I am living beside a gaggle of syria refugees, I used to live in the apartment they now live in, they are drunken, loud, obnoxious arseholes that stink the place up and throw their shit everywhere, they hold phone calls in the hallway at all hours waking the rest of us up, they got to bed around four, I wake the c***ts up at six every morning by knocking the door prior to me going to work, Obama is to blame for this forced

Ask the French if there is a problem, ask the Belgians, you make me sick siddie, your head is squarely up your ass at this juncture, remember the statement where the Muslims and liberals news outlets blamed instances of attempted/rape cases on the fact these c***ts were not used to seeing women in skirts and halter tops etc!

I hope you have it in you to move to the middle east, take your family/friends with you for a year and if you come back with the same opinion I will accept it as fact, the fact is you are owned by the left, the same left who want cheap labour worldwide and who fawn over foreign nationals for future votes, you make me sick siddy!
You're a walking cliche.  ;D

And you genuinely haven't the faintest idea what you're talking about.

Hence you quote "rape figures" from Scandinavia, a favoured red herring of the Trumpets and other anti-immigrant morons, the narrative around which has long been debunked, but I guess that doesn't stop you quoting fake news.

Every time you post you prove me right.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: seafoid on March 23, 2017, 09:36:14 PM
Quote from: stew on March 23, 2017, 07:27:37 PM
Quote from: sid waddell on March 23, 2017, 06:03:34 PM
Quote from: thebuzz on March 23, 2017, 05:36:39 PM
Quote from: J70 on March 23, 2017, 05:08:52 PM
Quote from: whitey on March 23, 2017, 02:20:38 PM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

What a pile of nonsense.......how many would have been killed if the plot to hijack the airlines hadnt been foiled back in 2006.

Much (but not all) of the terrorism has been perpertated by individuals (and their offspring)  who have been allowed/invited into the UK under the Labour Partys multicultural wet dream

And how many people would be alive if there was decent health service? How many would be alive if a ban on texting while driving was properly enforced or the real dangers even recognized by all drivers? How many would be alive if people didn't drive drunk?

The point about risk and perspective is absolutely valid.

The point is that no one sets out to deliberately kill people by not having a decent health service. No one (usually) sets out to kill people by crashing a car. This guy deliberately murdered those people so it's automatically viewed in a different perspective.

The ridiculous, over the top, non-stop hysterical media coverage given to this type of terrorism is entirely disproportionate to the threat it poses.

And it's encouraging it, if anything.

The political and media coverage given to the so called "threat" of immigration and particularly Islamic immigration throughout the western world is an utter nonsense and a fraud which seeks to manufacture a massive problem which doesn't exist. But make enough people think something exists and you might just manufacture a real problem. That's what happening. And that problem isn't immigration. It's the demonisation and vilification of immigrants. Those that claim a "massive problem", generally are the massive problem.

Sid, please go live in the Muslim world, take ten thousand of your closest friends with you and see what happens you absolute useless apologist you.

Look at the rape figures in Scandinavia, look at what happene
Quote
d when Merkel parted her legs and let some of these extremist  c***ts flow in like wine!

I am living beside a gaggle of syria refugees, I used to live in the apartment they now live in, they are drunken, loud, obnoxious arseholes that stink the place up and throw their shit everywhere, they hold phone calls in the hallway at all hours waking the rest of us up, they got to bed around four, I wake the c***ts up at six every morning by knocking the door prior to me going to work, Obama is to blame for this forced

Ask the French if there is a problem, ask the Belgians, you make me sick siddie, your head is squarely up your ass at this juncture, remember the statement where the Muslims and liberals news outlets blamed instances of attempted/rape cases on the fact these c***ts were not used to seeing women in skirts and halter tops etc!

I hope you have it in you to move to the middle east, take your family/friends with you for a year and if you come back with the same opinion I will accept it as fact, the fact is you are owned by the left, the same left who want cheap labour worldwide and who fawn over foreign nationals for future votes, you make me sick siddy!
Stew, I lived in Egypt for a while. Very few Egyptians would countenance moving to Lurgan.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: lawnseed on March 23, 2017, 09:42:29 PM
Quote from: hardstation on March 23, 2017, 09:29:22 PM
QuoteLook at the rape figures in Scandinavia, look at what happened when Merkel parted her legs and let some of these extremist  c***ts flow in like wine!

;D

Ok then, what are the rape figures in Scandinavia and what happened when Merkel let them in?

so sexual frustration is putting these fellas away in head? them horny horney??
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: trileacman on March 24, 2017, 03:47:42 AM
Quote from: stew on March 23, 2017, 07:27:37 PM
Quote from: sid waddell on March 23, 2017, 06:03:34 PM
Quote from: thebuzz on March 23, 2017, 05:36:39 PM
Quote from: J70 on March 23, 2017, 05:08:52 PM
Quote from: whitey on March 23, 2017, 02:20:38 PM
Quote from: Hardy on March 22, 2017, 11:43:40 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 22, 2017, 11:17:45 PM
Just what we need ... more scaremongering from the Foxnews crew... I'll bet this was top story there all day ignoring the dozens of a Americans killed by guns at the same time!

That was a horrible ordeal in London today and my heart goes out to the families who have suffered a terrible and senseless loss!!

Fewer than ten people have died in Britain in "terrorist" attacks in ten years. In the same period over 21,000 have died on the roads. But commentators seem unable or unwilling to accommodate the conclusion that the threat to the individual from politically motivated attacks is 1/2000th of the threat from motor cars. On the contrary, the news media collaborate with the deranged lunatics who carry out these attacks, and with the deranged right-wing nutcases who will feed their xenophobia on this news, by providing them with the achievement of their objective. Non-stop coverage on the BBC throughout the afternoon. Extended news programmes. Hours of coverage again tonight.

In a mediascape with a sense of perspective, wouldn't the ten o'clock news have been, "Five people died today when a man attacked passers-by and police in Westminster. Five people died today in road accidents across Britain. And in sport ..."? Of course I'd still not expect any coverage of the murder of expendable foreign civilians in drone attacks etc.

What a pile of nonsense.......how many would have been killed if the plot to hijack the airlines hadnt been foiled back in 2006.

Much (but not all) of the terrorism has been perpertated by individuals (and their offspring)  who have been allowed/invited into the UK under the Labour Partys multicultural wet dream

And how many people would be alive if there was decent health service? How many would be alive if a ban on texting while driving was properly enforced or the real dangers even recognized by all drivers? How many would be alive if people didn't drive drunk?

The point about risk and perspective is absolutely valid.

The point is that no one sets out to deliberately kill people by not having a decent health service. No one (usually) sets out to kill people by crashing a car. This guy deliberately murdered those people so it's automatically viewed in a different perspective.

The ridiculous, over the top, non-stop hysterical media coverage given to this type of terrorism is entirely disproportionate to the threat it poses.

And it's encouraging it, if anything.

The political and media coverage given to the so called "threat" of immigration and particularly Islamic immigration throughout the western world is an utter nonsense and a fraud which seeks to manufacture a massive problem which doesn't exist. But make enough people think something exists and you might just manufacture a real problem. That's what happening. And that problem isn't immigration. It's the demonisation and vilification of immigrants. Those that claim a "massive problem", generally are the massive problem.

Sid, please go live in the Muslim world, take ten thousand of your closest friends with you and see what happens you absolute useless apologist you.

Look at the rape figures in Scandinavia, look at what happene
Quote
d when Merkel parted her legs and let some of these extremist  c***ts flow in like wine!

I am living beside a gaggle of syria refugees, I used to live in the apartment they now live in, they are drunken, loud, obnoxious arseholes that stink the place up and throw their shit everywhere, they hold phone calls in the hallway at all hours waking the rest of us up, they got to bed around four, I wake the c***ts up at six every morning by knocking the door prior to me going to work, Obama is to blame for this forced

Ask the French if there is a problem, ask the Belgians, you make me sick siddie, your head is squarely up your ass at this juncture, remember the statement where the Muslims and liberals news outlets blamed instances of attempted/rape cases on the fact these c***ts were not used to seeing women in skirts and halter tops etc!

I hope you have it in you to move to the middle east, take your family/friends with you for a year and if you come back with the same opinion I will accept it as fact, the fact is you are owned by the left, the same left who want cheap labour worldwide and who fawn over foreign nationals for future votes, you make me sick siddy!

You're an awful bollix.

'Murcia has fucked your head up.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: The Gs Man on March 24, 2017, 09:14:21 AM
Love Stew's rants!   :D
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: brokencrossbar1 on March 24, 2017, 01:06:54 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on March 22, 2017, 05:34:48 PM
Terror incident?  Guy with a knife?  Bullshit...a nutjob either thinking he is someone or a domestic violence gone crazy.

I should state that he was a self radicalised nutjob thinking he was someone. ISIS might claim him but he was a life criminal involved in petty crimes. According to the senior office in counter terrorism "Our working assumption is that he was inspired by international terrorism'. He was 'inspired'...not directed, not ordered, not under instructions but inspired. Some days I'm inspired to sing songs...it doesn't make me a rock star. To call him a terrorist is wrong as it creates a mystique around him that makes him a martyr for the cause. He should be clearly made out to be a crazed lunatic who has used a set of circumstances to fulfill his innate desire to cause trouble. No freedom fighter here only an ill educated fool who has caused mayhem and destruction for a cause he probably doesn't even understand
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Hardy on March 24, 2017, 02:09:36 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on March 24, 2017, 01:06:54 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on March 22, 2017, 05:34:48 PM
Terror incident?  Guy with a knife?  Bullshit...a nutjob either thinking he is someone or a domestic violence gone crazy.

I should state that he was a self radicalised nutjob thinking he was someone. ISIS might claim him but he was a life criminal involved in petty crimes. According to the senior office in counter terrorism "Our working assumption is that he was inspired by international terrorism'. He was 'inspired'...not directed, not ordered, not under instructions but inspired. Some days I'm inspired to sing songs...it doesn't make me a rock star. To call him a terrorist is wrong as it creates a mystique around him that makes him a martyr for the cause. He should be clearly made out to be a crazed lunatic who has used a set of circumstances to fulfill his innate desire to cause trouble. No freedom fighter here only an ill educated fool who has caused mayhem and destruction for a cause he probably doesn't even understand

Spot on. And as for the this being an example of islamic immigrant killers "flowing" in, like wine no less, his name was Adrian and he was born in Kent.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: seafoid on March 25, 2017, 06:23:57 AM
Researchers examined Trump's healthcare proposal to deny health insurance to 24 million people and estimated it would cause 44,000 deaths per year.

You won't hear about that on Fox. Let's all jump up and down about terrorism.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: screenexile on March 25, 2017, 04:29:15 PM
Here's a decent hypothetical question...

"If the UK's counter terrorism budget was halved and given to the NHS how many extra lives would be saved  per year??
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Owen Brannigan on March 25, 2017, 04:55:07 PM
Quote from: screenexile on March 25, 2017, 04:29:15 PM
Here's a decent hypothetical question...

"If the UK's counter terrorism budget was halved and given to the NHS how many extra lives would be saved  per year??

Probably not many as the problem with the English NHS lies with the failure to integrate social care with the NHS.  Social care is provided by local councils and is unable to meet the needs of the medical providers.  This means that hospitals are increasingly filled with bed blocking elderly who make up the majority of those being treated by hospitals.  Therefore, most of the deaths in hospitals are elderly who should have been discharged into social care and who will have been killed by hospital acquired infections.  The recent budget was supposed to deal with the beginning of increasing the social care budget for councils until the Tories lost heir nerve about raising taxes to pay for social care.

Giving half of the counter terrorism budget to social care would be a beginning to addressing this major population which has aged faster than our own and is probably a less family oriented and less caring society.
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Denn Forever on April 07, 2017, 05:42:42 PM
Stockholm hit by as similar attack. 

http://www.rte.ie/news/2017/0407/866105-stockholm/
Title: Re: Terror attack in London
Post by: Farrandeelin on April 07, 2017, 09:06:57 PM
Quote from: Denn Forever on April 07, 2017, 05:42:42 PM
Stockholm hit by as similar attack. 

http://www.rte.ie/news/2017/0407/866105-stockholm/

Just watching the news now. Probably ISIS c***ts. God only knows where is next.