Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors

Started by tyrone girl, August 10, 2017, 11:47:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Milltown Row2

None of us are getting out of here alive, so please stop treating yourself like an after thought. Ea


GJL

Quote from: Tony Baloney on February 12, 2018, 11:58:29 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on February 12, 2018, 11:48:26 PM
https://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sunday-life/news/shame-of-northern-ireland-paedophile-hunters-sins-of-the-lynch-mob-revealed-36589316.html
Don't be upsetting Fearon.

So they turn out to be a bunch of loyalist scumbags! Who'd have guessed it!  Tony you need to reassess your opinion and remember it takes a stronger type of man to admit when he has made an error in judgment.

Tony Baloney

Quote from: GJL on February 13, 2018, 12:05:38 AM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on February 12, 2018, 11:58:29 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on February 12, 2018, 11:48:26 PM
https://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sunday-life/news/shame-of-northern-ireland-paedophile-hunters-sins-of-the-lynch-mob-revealed-36589316.html
Don't be upsetting Fearon.

So they turn out to be a bunch of loyalist scumbags! Who'd have guessed it!  Tony you need to reassess your opinion and remember it takes a stronger type of man to admit when he has made an error in judgment.
LOL the phrase "when hell freezes over" springs to mind.

T Fearon

Loyalist scumbags or not,credit where it's due. I will support anyone when they are doing the right thing or serving the community usefully.

Snapchap

Quote from: Snapchap on February 10, 2018, 11:28:22 PM
Quote from: T Fearon on February 09, 2018, 08:05:01 PM
Why did a BBC reporter turn up uninvited and unannounced at a private law abiding citizen's home? No wonder the guy was upset and lost it

The BBC reporter may have tirned up uninvited amd unannounced but that is not illegal by any stretch of the imagination. Nor was is against journalistic regulations. So given that he broke no rules or laws, then the abusive reaction by the group was utterly over the top and by and rational standards, broke several laws. Now given those facts, is it fair to assume you no longer support that particular group since you stated yourself that you would only support them 'so long as they acted within the law'?

In your own time there, Tony.

general_lee

Quote from: T Fearon on February 13, 2018, 12:14:59 AM
Loyalist scumbags or not,credit where it's due. I will support anyone when they are doing the right thing or serving the community usefully.
Lol. Tony you are some craic  ;D

T Fearon

Quote from: Snapchap on February 13, 2018, 12:37:44 AM
Quote from: Snapchap on February 10, 2018, 11:28:22 PM
Quote from: T Fearon on February 09, 2018, 08:05:01 PM
Why did a BBC reporter turn up uninvited and unannounced at a private law abiding citizen's home? No wonder the guy was upset and lost it

The BBC reporter may have tirned up uninvited amd unannounced but that is not illegal by any stretch of the imagination. Nor was is against journalistic regulations. So given that he broke no rules or laws, then the abusive reaction by the group was utterly over the top and by and rational standards, broke several laws. Now given those facts, is it fair to assume you no longer support that particular group since you stated yourself that you would only support them 'so long as they acted within the law'?

In your own time there, Tony.

If a BBC reporter and camera crew turned up at your house out of the blue would you be happy,unless it's a stunt on Michael Mc Intyre's show

Gabriel_Hurl


Snapchap

Quote from: T Fearon on February 13, 2018, 01:17:45 AM
Quote from: Snapchap on February 13, 2018, 12:37:44 AM
Quote from: Snapchap on February 10, 2018, 11:28:22 PM
Quote from: T Fearon on February 09, 2018, 08:05:01 PM
Why did a BBC reporter turn up uninvited and unannounced at a private law abiding citizen's home? No wonder the guy was upset and lost it

The BBC reporter may have tirned up uninvited amd unannounced but that is not illegal by any stretch of the imagination. Nor was is against journalistic regulations. So given that he broke no rules or laws, then the abusive reaction by the group was utterly over the top and by and rational standards, broke several laws. Now given those facts, is it fair to assume you no longer support that particular group since you stated yourself that you would only support them 'so long as they acted within the law'?

In your own time there, Tony.

If a BBC reporter and camera crew turned up at your house out of the blue would you be happy,unless it's a stunt on Michael Mc Intyre's show
1. If a BBC reporter and camera crew turned up at your house out of the blue and acted entirely lawfully, would you feel you have the right to break the law in response?
2. You clearly stated that you supported these groups "so long as they act within the law". Given that this group quite clearly broke several laws in response to them being 'unhappy' at something, is it not fair to assume that either you no longer support the group in question or else you were lying in saying your support was conditional on their law abiding behaviour?

imtommygunn

Quote from: Gabriel_Hurl on February 13, 2018, 01:45:34 AM
You'd love the attention

Jesus could you imagine lol.

Except then he'd have to actually be his real self rather than a wum.

Square Ball

#806
Self-styled 'paedophile hunters' revealed - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-43024711

Old news really
Hospitals are not equipped to treat stupid

Frank_The_Tank

Quote from: T Fearon on February 13, 2018, 01:17:45 AM
Quote from: Snapchap on February 13, 2018, 12:37:44 AM
Quote from: Snapchap on February 10, 2018, 11:28:22 PM
Quote from: T Fearon on February 09, 2018, 08:05:01 PM
Why did a BBC reporter turn up uninvited and unannounced at a private law abiding citizen's home? No wonder the guy was upset and lost it

The BBC reporter may have tirned up uninvited amd unannounced but that is not illegal by any stretch of the imagination. Nor was is against journalistic regulations. So given that he broke no rules or laws, then the abusive reaction by the group was utterly over the top and by and rational standards, broke several laws. Now given those facts, is it fair to assume you no longer support that particular group since you stated yourself that you would only support them 'so long as they acted within the law'?

In your own time there, Tony.

If a BBC reporter and camera crew turned up at your house out of the blue would you be happy,unless it's a stunt on Michael Mc Intyre's show

Perhaps you should read their own guide on doorstepping http://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines/privacy/doorstepping
Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience

TabClear

I was not sure about these groups but after hearing some snippets of Kevn Magees report on the radio and the comments of an ex senior police officer its clear this crowd are complete morons who are doing more harm than good. Foul mouth thugs who are clearly just in it for their own reasons. I would be interested to see the police records on these clowns because I have no doubt some of them would be extensive.

Milltown Row2

Look its a brilliant idea, and the intent of outing or at the very least making police aware of the potential to comit crimes on children by these people is good... But the methods are all wrong and none of it will really stick unless there are other things on that persons computer or the person actually has met a 14 year old, not a 35 year old woman on the internet sayings shes 14 on a site that you must be 18 to begin with!

I wonder how much support they will have now on FB, will probably lose half their support  ;)
None of us are getting out of here alive, so please stop treating yourself like an after thought. Ea