Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
So Lavey v Lavey is a possibility
Please let this happen.
I thought it hilarious that the company involved actually thanked god after the ruling
as if a celestial dictator had anything to do with a point of law!
Ballymacnab 0-14
Crossmaglen 0-13
What competition is this?
To be fair to Syferus it was a pretty idiotic comment he took exception to.
Surmising what was Ronaldo's thought process?
I'm sure you'll be able to work out what I meant eventually.
On this, just gauging general opinion,
What are people thoughts on those that accept 'payoffs', then proceed down the criminal path some years later?
Sympathetic? Had their money and blew it so they lose their 'right' to justice?
Given that this doesn't happen and you appear to have demonstrated a spectacular lack of knowledge of what has actually occurred in this specific case, it's pretty hard to offer an opinion on it.
You don't "proceed down the criminal path" at all. That course of action is pursued by the state. Mayorga has filed a civil suit.
To be fair to Syferus it was a pretty idiotic comment he took exception to.
1/3 the thread descends into a conversation about Roscommon. Any takers.
It would take someone of your breath-taking arrogance to try and make a thread about rape about inter-county point-scoring.
You would think that with a man of his standing there would be plenty of willing women.
So why did he choose one that wasn't?
Consent can be removed at any point. Such a weird way to look at it as usual.
Sorry for looking at it differently. Hope I haven't offended you.
You’ve done more than that with your knuckle-dragging approach to this topic in the past.
