The Many Faces of US Politics...

Started by Tyrones own, March 20, 2009, 09:29:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

heganboy

Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity

seafoid

"f**k it, just score"- Donaghy   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbxG2WwVRjU

sid waddell

Quote from: seafoid on February 06, 2018, 01:23:44 PM
Rupert murdoch is a leftie?
Alex Jones and Mike Cernovich are centrists with a relentless, unimpeachable intellectual honesty.

Yeah.

johnneycool

Quote from: seafoid on February 06, 2018, 01:23:44 PM
Rupert murdoch is a leftie?

Not being totally clued into US politics I always found it strange that Whitey and Stew keep going on about the DEM's and the left wing snowflakes thing, but i've always thought of being left wing as almost socialist in political outlook and I can't fathom how the likes of the Clintons, even Obama and Bernie Saunders are remotely leftist.
Not in my eyes.

sid waddell

This is comedy stuff.

Trump "claimed" he wants to do an interview with Mueller under oath. But his lawyers don't want to let him because they think he'd incriminate himself.

We don't have to imagine what it would be like to have a petulant six year old child as US president. Because that's what the current incumbent is.

Another poster was talking about "transparency".

Transparency means:
Interview.
Under oath.
No time limits.
No briefing as to what the questions will be.
And no subject out of bounds for questioning.


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/us/politics/trump-lawyers-special-counsel-interview.html

WASHINGTON — Lawyers for President Trump have advised him against sitting down for a wide-ranging interview with the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, according to four people briefed on the matter, raising the specter of a monthslong court battle over whether the president must answer questions under oath.

His lawyers are concerned that the president, who has a history of making false statements and contradicting himself, could be charged with lying to investigators. Their stance puts them at odds with Mr. Trump, who has said publicly and privately that he is eager to speak with Mr. Mueller as part of the investigation into possible ties between his associates and Russia's election interference, and whether he obstructed justice.

whitey

Quote from: sid waddell on February 06, 2018, 01:43:06 PM
This is comedy stuff.

Trump "claimed" he wants to do an interview with Mueller under oath. But his lawyers don't want to let him because they think he'd incriminate himself.

We don't have to imagine what it would be like to have a petulant six year old child as US president. Because that's what the current incumbent is.

Another poster was talking about "transparency".

Transparency means:
Interview.
Under oath.
No time limits.
No briefing as to what the questions will be.
And no subject out of bounds for questioning.


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/us/politics/trump-lawyers-special-counsel-interview.html

WASHINGTON — Lawyers for President Trump have advised him against sitting down for a wide-ranging interview with the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, according to four people briefed on the matter, raising the specter of a monthslong court battle over whether the president must answer questions under oath.

His lawyers are concerned that the president, who has a history of making false statements and contradicting himself, could be charged with lying to investigators. Their stance puts them at odds with Mr. Trump, who has said publicly and privately that he is eager to speak with Mr. Mueller as part of the investigation into possible ties between his associates and Russia's election interference, and whether he obstructed justice.

Why the hell should he

Hillary wasnt interviewed under oath.....the feckin interview wasnt even recorded...

Baile an tuaigh

Democrats and Republicans are two sides of the same shekel.

sid waddell

Quote from: whitey on February 06, 2018, 03:14:08 PM
Quote from: sid waddell on February 06, 2018, 01:43:06 PM
This is comedy stuff.

Trump "claimed" he wants to do an interview with Mueller under oath. But his lawyers don't want to let him because they think he'd incriminate himself.

We don't have to imagine what it would be like to have a petulant six year old child as US president. Because that's what the current incumbent is.

Another poster was talking about "transparency".

Transparency means:
Interview.
Under oath.
No time limits.
No briefing as to what the questions will be.
And no subject out of bounds for questioning.


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/us/politics/trump-lawyers-special-counsel-interview.html

WASHINGTON — Lawyers for President Trump have advised him against sitting down for a wide-ranging interview with the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, according to four people briefed on the matter, raising the specter of a monthslong court battle over whether the president must answer questions under oath.

His lawyers are concerned that the president, who has a history of making false statements and contradicting himself, could be charged with lying to investigators. Their stance puts them at odds with Mr. Trump, who has said publicly and privately that he is eager to speak with Mr. Mueller as part of the investigation into possible ties between his associates and Russia's election interference, and whether he obstructed justice.

Why the hell should he

Hillary wasnt interviewed under oath.....the feckin interview wasnt even recorded...

Hillary Clinton complied with everything that was asked of her by the FBI and Congress.

It's very telling when that when you don't have an answer you revert to your trademark "But Hillary" line. Like all Trump supporters do.

Now, Trump is the one who has said he wants to testify under oath.

If he isn't willing to testify under oath, he's lying to the American people yet again.

Why do you find lying to the American people acceptable?

Are you afraid that he'll incriminate himself if he testifies under oath?

You are, aren't you?

Remember, you were the one talking about "transparency".

Of course you only want transparency when it won't damage a Republican.

That's very transparent.




whitey

#11888
Quote from: sid waddell on February 06, 2018, 03:39:45 PM
Quote from: whitey on February 06, 2018, 03:14:08 PM
Quote from: sid waddell on February 06, 2018, 01:43:06 PM
This is comedy stuff.

Trump "claimed" he wants to do an interview with Mueller under oath. But his lawyers don't want to let him because they think he'd incriminate himself.

We don't have to imagine what it would be like to have a petulant six year old child as US president. Because that's what the current incumbent is.

Another poster was talking about "transparency".

Transparency means:
Interview.
Under oath.
No time limits.
No briefing as to what the questions will be.
And no subject out of bounds for questioning.


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/us/politics/trump-lawyers-special-counsel-interview.html

WASHINGTON — Lawyers for President Trump have advised him against sitting down for a wide-ranging interview with the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, according to four people briefed on the matter, raising the specter of a monthslong court battle over whether the president must answer questions under oath.

His lawyers are concerned that the president, who has a history of making false statements and contradicting himself, could be charged with lying to investigators. Their stance puts them at odds with Mr. Trump, who has said publicly and privately that he is eager to speak with Mr. Mueller as part of the investigation into possible ties between his associates and Russia's election interference, and whether he obstructed justice.

Why the hell should he

Hillary wasnt interviewed under oath.....the feckin interview wasnt even recorded...

Hillary Clinton complied with everything that was asked of her by the FBI and Congress.

It's very telling when that when you don't have an answer you revert to your trademark "But Hillary" line. Like all Trump supporters do.

Now, Trump is the one who has said he wants to testify under oath.

If he isn't willing to testify under oath, he's lying to the American people yet again.

Why do you find lying to the American people acceptable?

Are you afraid that he'll incriminate himself if he testifies under oath?

You are, aren't you?

Remember, you were the one talking about "transparency".

Of course you only want transparency when it won't damage a Republican.

That's very transparent.

Hahaha....deleting 30000 emails that were under congressional subpoena, forensically wiping her server, smashing blackberries with hammers......then to top it off her IT guy pleads the Fifth


Gabriel_Hurl

3,000 or 33,000?

What's the American Mirror have to say about this?

whitey

Quote from: Gabriel_Hurl on February 06, 2018, 04:13:25 PM
3,000 or 33,000?

What's the American Mirror have to say about this?

I dont know, but whatever their opinion is, its just as valid as those expressed by the NY Times or CNN


sid waddell

Quote from: whitey on February 06, 2018, 04:28:28 PM
Quote from: Gabriel_Hurl on February 06, 2018, 04:13:25 PM
3,000 or 33,000?

What's the American Mirror have to say about this?

I dont know, but whatever their opinion is, its just as valid as those expressed by the NY Times or CNN
Ho ho ho. Keep it up.

I see an actual Nazi now looks likely to get the Republican nomination to run for Congress in Illinois.

This is entirely logical given what the Republican Party now is. In fact he'll be the most honest candidate they run in the whole US given what they now are.

Holocaust denier poised to claim GOP nomination in Illinois race for Congress

https://chicago.suntimes.com/politics/holocaust-denier-arthur-jones-republican-3rd-congressional-district-lipinski-newman/

Quote
Arthur Jones — an outspoken Holocaust denier, activist anti-Semite and white supremacist — is poised to become the Republican nominee for an Illinois congressional seat representing parts of Chicago and nearby suburbs.

"Well first of all, I'm running for Congress not the chancellor of Germany. All right. To me the Holocaust is what I said it is: It's an international extortion racket," Jones told the Chicago Sun-Times.

Indeed, Jones' website for his latest congressional run includes a section titled "The 'Holocaust Racket'" where he calls the genocide carried out by the German Nazi regime and collaborators in other nations "the biggest blackest lie in history."

QuoteJones told the Sun-Times he is a former leader of the American Nazi Party and now heads a group called the America First Committee. "Membership in this organization is open to any white American citizen of European, non-Jewish descent," he said.

whitey

Quote from: sid waddell on February 06, 2018, 04:43:45 PM
Quote from: whitey on February 06, 2018, 04:28:28 PM
Quote from: Gabriel_Hurl on February 06, 2018, 04:13:25 PM
3,000 or 33,000?

What's the American Mirror have to say about this?

I dont know, but whatever their opinion is, its just as valid as those expressed by the NY Times or CNN
Ho ho ho. Keep it up.

I see an actual Nazi now looks likely to get the Republican nomination to run for Congress in Illinois.

This is entirely logical given what the Republican Party now is. In fact he'll be the most honest candidate they run in the whole US given what they now are.

Holocaust denier poised to claim GOP nomination in Illinois race for Congress

https://chicago.suntimes.com/politics/holocaust-denier-arthur-jones-republican-3rd-congressional-district-lipinski-newman/

Quote
Arthur Jones — an outspoken Holocaust denier, activist anti-Semite and white supremacist — is poised to become the Republican nominee for an Illinois congressional seat representing parts of Chicago and nearby suburbs.

"Well first of all, I'm running for Congress not the chancellor of Germany. All right. To me the Holocaust is what I said it is: It's an international extortion racket," Jones told the Chicago Sun-Times.

Indeed, Jones' website for his latest congressional run includes a section titled "The 'Holocaust Racket'" where he calls the genocide carried out by the German Nazi regime and collaborators in other nations "the biggest blackest lie in history."

QuoteJones told the Sun-Times he is a former leader of the American Nazi Party and now heads a group called the America First Committee. "Membership in this organization is open to any white American citizen of European, non-Jewish descent," he said.

Hahah...you conveniently left out the part about the state GOP going to court to prevent him from getting on the ballot (as they also did the last time he ran)

Very little you can do to stop crazies getting on the ballot in a primary, but keep it up.....if thats all the Democrats have to offer theyre going to do shag all in November.

sid waddell

I think you've proved beyond doubt now whitey that you're not a bit worried about crazies - in fact you admitted that you support the use of Russian interference and propaganda in US politics earlier today.

This chap will fit in just fine with your agenda.