Quote from: Mad Mentor on July 15, 2025, 07:25:49 PMThe 3 up is meant to prevent teams going 100% defensive? I think the two pointer is here to stay,(wouldn't be a fan of the two pointer) I think 4 points for a goal could certainly prevent the handballing around the arc and get more direct kicking into the inside forward line which I believe was the original intention of the FRC.Quote from: Wildweasel74 on July 15, 2025, 02:55:09 PMI always thought a 40m arc for a point is too easy for big lads to get the distance. Score it from beyond the 45, make a 2pters a special score. N Grimley had a great long ranger in the final last yr, just worth a point, R O'Neill and R Beggan had 2 great 2 pters this year.memorable scores.Do away with a 2pter free, no benefit when county keepers hitting ball 60m in games. Maybe it make a goal actual value again. I also allow players inside their arc for kickouts. There no skill in a hit and hope to midfield and not enough room to go short on kickouts. You can dominate a game and get pinned in and beat in the last 10mins of a game
One benefit of the 2 pointer is it keeps an element of jeopardy alive for longer if a team is behind and stops a team with a lead going 100% defensive to see out a game. If you've dominated a game but couldn't see it out then that's just tough. For all the talk of how easy they are to score I reckon two pointers are rarer than they should be. As a neutral spectator to most championship games - at least the latter stages - I think it is definitely more watchable this year. The dissent punishment has certainly cleared a lot of the sh1te out of the game.