Moore Street demolition

Started by foxcommander, January 08, 2016, 06:02:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

What do you think they should do with Moore Street?

Build a new shopping centre
5 (13.5%)
Preserve the buildings
25 (67.6%)
Don't care
7 (18.9%)

Total Members Voted: 37


foxcommander

#1
Jesus - none of the usual suspects have one thing to say.


Can't stop progress eh?

Enda and co should go and take a commerative dump at the site to officially mark the start of 1916. Let's bury history forever.

http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/permission-given-for-sevenstorey-hotel-on-moore-street-rising-site-34349032.html
Every second of the day there's a Democrat telling a lie

Cunny Funt

They didn't preserve wood quay it's surprising Moore street has avoided demolition for so long.

Maguire01

Are the protesters arguing that the buildings weren't in ruins prior to the rising? I'm not clear on what exactly they want to preserve.

snoopdog


Denn Forever

How many of the building were used during the planning of the rising and how many \were used during the rising?

Protect these and make them into a museum.
I have more respect for a man
that says what he means and
means what he says...

seafoid


foxcommander

Quote from: seafoid on January 10, 2016, 03:49:30 PM
Last of the bananas there love

Exactly - typical of the apathy shown by the people in the south.
Would far rather fly to las vegas, drape themselves in a tricolor and cheers on some arrogant "irish" ufc asshole who has no problem wearing a poppy.
or head to twickenham, sing along with god save the queen and stand to attention to "Irelands call" as the national anthem.

No wonder the brits ruled for so long.

Every second of the day there's a Democrat telling a lie

Maguire01

Still not clear. Is the protest over buildings that didn't exist in 1916 or are the authorities wrong on this? Because if the authorities are right, then what's the point of the protest?

ashman

Quote from: foxcommander on January 10, 2016, 07:01:54 PM
Quote from: seafoid on January 10, 2016, 03:49:30 PM
Last of the bananas there love

Exactly - typical of the apathy shown by the people in the south.
Would far rather fly to las vegas, drape themselves in a tricolor and cheers on some arrogant "irish" ufc asshole who has no problem wearing a poppy.
or head to twickenham, sing along with god save the queen and stand to attention to "Irelands call" as the national anthem.

No wonder the brits ruled for so long.

I"d say you are a proper hard Cnut .

foxcommander

Quote from: ashman on January 11, 2016, 09:37:33 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on January 10, 2016, 07:01:54 PM
Quote from: seafoid on January 10, 2016, 03:49:30 PM
Last of the bananas there love

Exactly - typical of the apathy shown by the people in the south.
Would far rather fly to las vegas, drape themselves in a tricolor and cheers on some arrogant "irish" ufc asshole who has no problem wearing a poppy.
or head to twickenham, sing along with god save the queen and stand to attention to "Irelands call" as the national anthem.

No wonder the brits ruled for so long.

I"d say you are a proper hard Cnut .

;)
Every second of the day there's a Democrat telling a lie

Rossfan

Quote from: ashman on January 11, 2016, 09:37:33 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on January 10, 2016, 07:01:54 PM
Quote from: seafoid on January 10, 2016, 03:49:30 PM
Last of the bananas there love

Exactly - typical of the apathy shown by the people in the south.
Would far rather fly to las vegas, drape themselves in a tricolor and cheers on some arrogant "irish" ufc asshole who has no problem wearing a poppy.
or head to twickenham, sing along with god save the queen and stand to attention to "Irelands call" as the national anthem.

No wonder the brits ruled for so long.

I"d say you are a proper hard Cnut .
A bigoted bolox more like.
Davy's given us a dream to cling to
We're going to bring home the SAM

Maguire01

Quote from: Maguire01 on January 11, 2016, 07:46:52 PM
Still not clear. Is the protest over buildings that didn't exist in 1916 or are the authorities wrong on this? Because if the authorities are right, then what's the point of the protest?
So, despite a majority here (albeit a small number) saying the buildings should be preserved, no one seems to be able to clarify what exactly they want to be preserved.

foxcommander

Good news - An injunction against any further demolition work has been put in place until a full hearing is held on February 2nd.

It's great that the minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht (a language she can't even speak) is hell bent on destroying without even consulting. Read the below and you can smell the scaremongering. She should have just been honest and said they had plans for a 1.25 billion development and want this to go ahead otherwise the council will have to compensate the developers.



The statement said demolition of numbers 13 and 18 "is necessary to underpin the national monument, which is an old building built without proper foundations."

This will allow for the insertion of gables which the department said "are necessary" to safeguard the long-term stability of the national monument.

The statement also said Minister for Heritage Heather Humphries "is very disappointed that any group would attempt to delay these works and jeopardise the project.".
Every second of the day there's a Democrat telling a lie

Maguire01

Quote from: foxcommander on January 12, 2016, 06:49:23 PM
Good news - An injunction against any further demolition work has been put in place until a full hearing is held on February 2nd.

It's great that the minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht (a language she can't even speak) is hell bent on destroying without even consulting. Read the below and you can smell the scaremongering. She should have just been honest and said they had plans for a 1.25 billion development and want this to go ahead otherwise the council will have to compensate the developers.



The statement said demolition of numbers 13 and 18 "is necessary to underpin the national monument, which is an old building built without proper foundations."

This will allow for the insertion of gables which the department said "are necessary" to safeguard the long-term stability of the national monument.

The statement also said Minister for Heritage Heather Humphries "is very disappointed that any group would attempt to delay these works and jeopardise the project.".
So, tell us the truth about numbers 13 and 18. Did they exist in their current form in 1916?