Author Topic: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors  (Read 45911 times)

Norf Tyrone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6709
    • View Profile
Owen Roe O'Neills GAC, Leckpatrick, Tyrone

Newbridge Exile

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #721 on: February 07, 2018, 01:54:00 PM »
I was reading one of these hunters in Limavady has over 100 criminal convictions himself?
Yep a real pillar of the community he is

longballin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2134
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #722 on: February 07, 2018, 01:55:36 PM »
I was reading one of these hunters in Limavady has over 100 criminal convictions himself?

Where did you see that? I'd like to see that article or post.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/facebook-paedophile-hunter-joe-mccloskey-convicted-of-97th-offence-31350237.html

Indecency and drug offences and that's what's protecting our children... so who protects our children from him? He wouldn't pass a vetting process to work with children.

paddyjohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1222
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #723 on: February 07, 2018, 02:08:34 PM »
A real nice lad.. Christ almighty

north_antrim_hound

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1188
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #724 on: February 07, 2018, 02:10:52 PM »
I was reading one of these hunters in Limavady has over 100 criminal convictions himself?

Where did you see that? I'd like to see that article or post.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/facebook-paedophile-hunter-joe-mccloskey-convicted-of-97th-offence-31350237.html

Indecency and drug offences and that's what's protecting our children... so who protects our children from him? He wouldn't pass a vetting process to work with children.

Why does this not supprise me.

Snapchap

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 153
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #725 on: February 07, 2018, 02:21:38 PM »
Never feel all that at ease seeing the videos of these groups.

Why they are maybe a good idea:
1. It's great to expose pedophiles

2. While there may not be many convictions following these stings, at least the public is shown who these pedophiles are. Without these groups, a lot of these pedophiles might not only never be convicted, but might never be even suspected/investigated.


Why I don't like these groups:
1. While they probably bring pedophiles to public attention who would otherwise have never even have been suspected, they probably do more harm than good when it comes to getting these people convicted.

2. The manner in which they behave during their 'stings'. They claim to be on the side of professionalism and decency and be solely motivated by a desire to protect children, yet their videos (which are easily accessible to children) are FULL of vile, sexually explicit language.

3. They seem to be motivated as much by their own self image and egos as anything else. In a lot of their videos it's not enough to tell someone they have evidence that shows they were attempting to groom children and inform them that the police are on the way - they seem to absolutely revel in talking about how they are protecting kids and even asking the accused if they want to thank them for what they are doing etc.

3. They, it seems, have wrongly accused people in the past. Can you for one second imagine one of these groups wrongly accusing you, in SUCH a public fashion, of being a pedophile? That is life destroying.

4. They state when they post videos that people should not attack the family of the accused or their property, but there are countless reports of people doing just that. They then wash their hands of any responsibility for that. That does not sit right with me.

5. The video this morning/last night of them verbally abusing the BBC's Kevin Magee was just sick and really exposed the members of this particular 'hunter' gang as nothing but a gang of absolute thugs and scumbags. The journalist in question broke no laws or journalistic rules when he attempted to inteview one of these 'hunters' at his home in the morning time. The response, as seen in today's video, was that the journalist was verbally assaulted in the street later that night by a large gang of these 'hunters' who behaved like vicious animals. One could even be heard calling Magee "a pedo f**k" as they sat on the road blocking his car (along with a whole street of traffic). During the course of the confrontation, they repeatedly shouted about how they are only interested in 'protecting kids', while they simultaneously walked the streets shouting foul mouth obscenities at Magee - not much concern for the innocence of any kids in the vicinity there. They even made a claim that Magee, when he visited the man's house, was protected by men with balaclavas, even though the man's own video clearly showed the two BBC men with Magee at the house, and neither of them were wearing balaclavas.

longballin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2134
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #726 on: February 07, 2018, 02:25:11 PM »
Never feel all that at ease seeing the videos of these groups.

Why they are maybe a good idea:
1. It's great to expose pedophiles

2. While there may not be many convictions following these stings, at least the public is shown who these pedophiles are. Without these groups, a lot of these pedophiles might not only never be convicted, but might never be even suspected/investigated.


Why I don't like these groups:
1. While they probably bring pedophiles to public attention who would otherwise have never even have been suspected, they probably do more harm than good when it comes to getting these people convicted.

2. The manner in which they behave during their 'stings'. They claim to be on the side of professionalism and decency and be solely motivated by a desire to protect children, yet their videos (which are easily accessible to children) are FULL of vile, sexually explicit language.

3. They seem to be motivated as much by their own self image and egos as anything else. In a lot of their videos it's not enough to tell someone they have evidence that shows they were attempting to groom children and inform them that the police are on the way - they seem to absolutely revel in talking about how they are protecting kids and even asking the accused if they want to thank them for what they are doing etc.

3. They, it seems, have wrongly accused people in the past. Can you for one second imagine one of these groups wrongly accusing you, in SUCH a public fashion, of being a pedophile? That is life destroying.

4. They state when they post videos that people should not attack the family of the accused or their property, but there are countless reports of people doing just that. They then wash their hands of any responsibility for that. That does not sit right with me.

5. The video this morning/last night of them verbally abusing the BBC's Kevin Magee was just sick and really exposed the members of this particular 'hunter' gang as nothing but a gang of absolute thugs and scumbags. The journalist in question broke no laws or journalistic rules when he attempted to inteview one of these 'hunters' at his home in the morning time. The response, as seen in today's video, was that the journalist was verbally assaulted in the street later that night by a large gang of these 'hunters' who behaved like vicious animals. One could even be heard calling Magee "a pedo f**k" as they sat on the road blocking his car (along with a whole street of traffic). During the course of the confrontation, they repeatedly shouted about how they are only interested in 'protecting kids', while they simultaneously walked the streets shouting foul mouth obscenities at Magee - not much concern for the innocence of any kids in the vicinity there. They even made a claim that Magee, when he visited the man's house, was protected by men with balaclavas, even though the man's own video clearly showed the two BBC men with Magee at the house, and neither of them were wearing balaclavas.

Excellent post. I was undecided for a while but now see they are a shower of egotistical thugs

The Gs Man

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1778
    • View Profile
    • Captain Kennedy
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #727 on: February 07, 2018, 02:30:27 PM »
Never feel all that at ease seeing the videos of these groups.

Why they are maybe a good idea:
1. It's great to expose pedophiles

2. While there may not be many convictions following these stings, at least the public is shown who these pedophiles are. Without these groups, a lot of these pedophiles might not only never be convicted, but might never be even suspected/investigated.


Why I don't like these groups:
1. While they probably bring pedophiles to public attention who would otherwise have never even have been suspected, they probably do more harm than good when it comes to getting these people convicted.

2. The manner in which they behave during their 'stings'. They claim to be on the side of professionalism and decency and be solely motivated by a desire to protect children, yet their videos (which are easily accessible to children) are FULL of vile, sexually explicit language.

3. They seem to be motivated as much by their own self image and egos as anything else. In a lot of their videos it's not enough to tell someone they have evidence that shows they were attempting to groom children and inform them that the police are on the way - they seem to absolutely revel in talking about how they are protecting kids and even asking the accused if they want to thank them for what they are doing etc.

3. They, it seems, have wrongly accused people in the past. Can you for one second imagine one of these groups wrongly accusing you, in SUCH a public fashion, of being a pedophile? That is life destroying.

4. They state when they post videos that people should not attack the family of the accused or their property, but there are countless reports of people doing just that. They then wash their hands of any responsibility for that. That does not sit right with me.

5. The video this morning/last night of them verbally abusing the BBC's Kevin Magee was just sick and really exposed the members of this particular 'hunter' gang as nothing but a gang of absolute thugs and scumbags. The journalist in question broke no laws or journalistic rules when he attempted to inteview one of these 'hunters' at his home in the morning time. The response, as seen in today's video, was that the journalist was verbally assaulted in the street later that night by a large gang of these 'hunters' who behaved like vicious animals. One could even be heard calling Magee "a pedo f**k" as they sat on the road blocking his car (along with a whole street of traffic). During the course of the confrontation, they repeatedly shouted about how they are only interested in 'protecting kids', while they simultaneously walked the streets shouting foul mouth obscenities at Magee - not much concern for the innocence of any kids in the vicinity there. They even made a claim that Magee, when he visited the man's house, was protected by men with balaclavas, even though the man's own video clearly showed the two BBC men with Magee at the house, and neither of them were wearing balaclavas.

Great post.  Sums up my thoughts exactly.
Phosporescent!

paddyjohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1222
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #728 on: February 07, 2018, 02:32:17 PM »
Never feel all that at ease seeing the videos of these groups.

Why they are maybe a good idea:
1. It's great to expose pedophiles

2. While there may not be many convictions following these stings, at least the public is shown who these pedophiles are. Without these groups, a lot of these pedophiles might not only never be convicted, but might never be even suspected/investigated.


Why I don't like these groups:
1. While they probably bring pedophiles to public attention who would otherwise have never even have been suspected, they probably do more harm than good when it comes to getting these people convicted.

2. The manner in which they behave during their 'stings'. They claim to be on the side of professionalism and decency and be solely motivated by a desire to protect children, yet their videos (which are easily accessible to children) are FULL of vile, sexually explicit language.

3. They seem to be motivated as much by their own self image and egos as anything else. In a lot of their videos it's not enough to tell someone they have evidence that shows they were attempting to groom children and inform them that the police are on the way - they seem to absolutely revel in talking about how they are protecting kids and even asking the accused if they want to thank them for what they are doing etc.

3. They, it seems, have wrongly accused people in the past. Can you for one second imagine one of these groups wrongly accusing you, in SUCH a public fashion, of being a pedophile? That is life destroying.

4. They state when they post videos that people should not attack the family of the accused or their property, but there are countless reports of people doing just that. They then wash their hands of any responsibility for that. That does not sit right with me.

5. The video this morning/last night of them verbally abusing the BBC's Kevin Magee was just sick and really exposed the members of this particular 'hunter' gang as nothing but a gang of absolute thugs and scumbags. The journalist in question broke no laws or journalistic rules when he attempted to inteview one of these 'hunters' at his home in the morning time. The response, as seen in today's video, was that the journalist was verbally assaulted in the street later that night by a large gang of these 'hunters' who behaved like vicious animals. One could even be heard calling Magee "a pedo f**k" as they sat on the road blocking his car (along with a whole street of traffic). During the course of the confrontation, they repeatedly shouted about how they are only interested in 'protecting kids', while they simultaneously walked the streets shouting foul mouth obscenities at Magee - not much concern for the innocence of any kids in the vicinity there. They even made a claim that Magee, when he visited the man's house, was protected by men with balaclavas, even though the man's own video clearly showed the two BBC men with Magee at the house, and neither of them were wearing balaclavas.

Best post on here in a long time.
« Last Edit: February 07, 2018, 05:51:29 PM by paddyjohn »

general_lee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1522
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #729 on: February 07, 2018, 03:17:54 PM »
The way they pulled the rasharkin boy out of the house and lined him up at the front. How hard do you think it will be for his solicitor to quash any possible conviction?
People they sting are under no obligation to stay put when they place them under citizens arrest. They quote “section 24a blah blah blah” of some English law that doesn’t apply here. So they are arguably guilty of false imprisonment. Then again they say they aren’t concerned about the law, they demonstrated as much last night with their behaviour with the BBC reporter

RedHand88

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 797
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #730 on: February 07, 2018, 03:21:22 PM »
Was any of this confrontation with Kevin Magee shown on the news? Was it the half 6 or the half 10 news?

T Fearon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #731 on: February 07, 2018, 05:15:10 PM »
Sorry but I remain suspicious of the British Broadcasting Corporation's  (whose dealings with paedophiles in their employ left a lot to be desired),motives.Why pick on one group member? Is this member typical of the average group member? Why are they trying to discredit these groups?

Let's face it if these groups were comprised of articulate,polite, University graduates they would not be effective.

As long as they act within the law they will have my support.

paddyjohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1222
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #732 on: February 07, 2018, 05:52:54 PM »
Sorry but I remain suspicious of the British Broadcasting Corporation's  (whose dealings with paedophiles in their employ left a lot to be desired),motives.Why pick on one group member? Is this member typical of the average group member? Why are they trying to discredit these groups?

Let's face it if these groups were comprised of articulate,polite, University graduates they would not be effective.

As long as they act within the law they will have my support.

So going into an innocent mans place of work and accusing him of being a peadophile is within the law and it is acceptable?

T Fearon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #733 on: February 07, 2018, 06:08:29 PM »
In all of the videos I've seen without exception there has been:

1.Copious and convincing verifiable evidence of guilt,gathered in advance.
2.Admissions in the majority of cases
3.A sting at a pre arranged venue at a pre arranged time with the predator thinking he was going to meet a child.
4.A complete absence of physical threat or gratuitous aggressiveness from the hunters.
5.Assurance that the group would protect the guilty person until the arrival of the Police

Franko

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1793
    • View Profile
Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« Reply #734 on: February 07, 2018, 07:05:42 PM »
In all of the videos I've seen without exception there has been:

1.Copious and convincing verifiable evidence of guilt,gathered in advance.
2.Admissions in the majority of cases
3.A sting at a pre arranged venue at a pre arranged time with the predator thinking he was going to meet a child.
4.A complete absence of physical threat or gratuitous aggressiveness from the hunters.
5.Assurance that the group would protect the guilty person until the arrival of the Police

What a plank.   ;D