Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors

Started by tyrone girl, August 10, 2017, 11:47:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Milltown Row2

Would that fall under harrassment and give this guy a way out? The effort they put in is totally wasted, allowing them to be bailed and allowed back on the streets in other areas! I'd never recognise their faces again should they move into a house up the street or round the corner!

Now if they spent time in jail then they wouldnt be around the corner or up the street! But hey lets keep doing it this way and we got 10,000 likes and comments there!
None of us are getting out of here alive, so please stop treating yourself like an after thought. Ea

paddyjohn

Quote from: themac_23 on February 07, 2018, 01:21:59 PM
Quote from: T Fearon on February 07, 2018, 01:16:21 PM
Why is the BBC using licence payers money to harrass innocent volunteers doing excellent community work?

Tony, sometimes on occasion, i feel you do talk a bit of sense but it gets overshadowed by the b*llsh*t you also post to gain a reaction. to call these characters 'innocent volunteers doing excellent community work' is not only wide off the mark but also extremely disrespectful to the many community workers out there who actually do great work in their community.

+1.

Go and ask the Hassons from Rasharkin how they are feeling? Yes their son has done wrong but why publicly shame a family of decent people who have built up a good business? What effect will this have on them?

Whatever backing they had is slowly being eroded by their current behavior. 

paddyjohn

Quote from: Gabriel_Hurl on February 07, 2018, 01:26:31 PM
I was reading one of these hunters in Limavady has over 100 criminal convictions himself?

Where did you see that? I'd like to see that article or post.

longballin

Quote from: clarshack on February 07, 2018, 01:26:22 PM
Quote from: T Fearon on February 07, 2018, 01:16:21 PM
Why is the BBC using licence payers money to harrass innocent volunteers doing excellent community work?

'innocent volunteers' with their UDA links...

http://telegra.ph/Who-are-the-Predator-Hunters-NI-01-19

quite a jump Tony your sympathy for the Catholic hierarchy covering up for priests child molesters to UDA loving predator hunters  ::)

Newbridge Exile

Quote from: longballin on February 07, 2018, 01:49:32 PM
Quote from: clarshack on February 07, 2018, 01:26:22 PM
Quote from: T Fearon on February 07, 2018, 01:16:21 PM
Why is the BBC using licence payers money to harrass innocent volunteers doing excellent community work?

'innocent volunteers' with their UDA links...

http://telegra.ph/Who-are-the-Predator-Hunters-NI-01-19

quite a jump Tony your sympathy for the Catholic hierarchy covering up for priests child molesters to UDA loving predator hunters  ::)
Yep at least you can  give a troll some kudos  when they are consistent on issues (Brendan Rodgers being another U turn of epic proportions (


Newbridge Exile

Quote from: Gabriel_Hurl on February 07, 2018, 01:26:31 PM
I was reading one of these hunters in Limavady has over 100 criminal convictions himself?
Yep a real pillar of the community he is

longballin

Quote from: Norf Tyrone on February 07, 2018, 01:53:15 PM
Quote from: paddyjohn on February 07, 2018, 01:36:48 PM
Quote from: Gabriel_Hurl on February 07, 2018, 01:26:31 PM
I was reading one of these hunters in Limavady has over 100 criminal convictions himself?

Where did you see that? I'd like to see that article or post.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/facebook-paedophile-hunter-joe-mccloskey-convicted-of-97th-offence-31350237.html

Indecency and drug offences and that's what's protecting our children... so who protects our children from him? He wouldn't pass a vetting process to work with children.

paddyjohn


north_antrim_hound

Quote from: longballin on February 07, 2018, 01:55:36 PM
Quote from: Norf Tyrone on February 07, 2018, 01:53:15 PM
Quote from: paddyjohn on February 07, 2018, 01:36:48 PM
Quote from: Gabriel_Hurl on February 07, 2018, 01:26:31 PM
I was reading one of these hunters in Limavady has over 100 criminal convictions himself?

Where did you see that? I'd like to see that article or post.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/facebook-paedophile-hunter-joe-mccloskey-convicted-of-97th-offence-31350237.html

Indecency and drug offences and that's what's protecting our children... so who protects our children from him? He wouldn't pass a vetting process to work with children.

Why does this not supprise me.
There's a man with a mullet going mad with a mallet in Millets

Snapchap

Never feel all that at ease seeing the videos of these groups.

Why they are maybe a good idea:
1. It's great to expose pedophiles

2. While there may not be many convictions following these stings, at least the public is shown who these pedophiles are. Without these groups, a lot of these pedophiles might not only never be convicted, but might never be even suspected/investigated.


Why I don't like these groups:
1. While they probably bring pedophiles to public attention who would otherwise have never even have been suspected, they probably do more harm than good when it comes to getting these people convicted.

2. The manner in which they behave during their 'stings'. They claim to be on the side of professionalism and decency and be solely motivated by a desire to protect children, yet their videos (which are easily accessible to children) are FULL of vile, sexually explicit language.

3. They seem to be motivated as much by their own self image and egos as anything else. In a lot of their videos it's not enough to tell someone they have evidence that shows they were attempting to groom children and inform them that the police are on the way - they seem to absolutely revel in talking about how they are protecting kids and even asking the accused if they want to thank them for what they are doing etc.

3. They, it seems, have wrongly accused people in the past. Can you for one second imagine one of these groups wrongly accusing you, in SUCH a public fashion, of being a pedophile? That is life destroying.

4. They state when they post videos that people should not attack the family of the accused or their property, but there are countless reports of people doing just that. They then wash their hands of any responsibility for that. That does not sit right with me.

5. The video this morning/last night of them verbally abusing the BBC's Kevin Magee was just sick and really exposed the members of this particular 'hunter' gang as nothing but a gang of absolute thugs and scumbags. The journalist in question broke no laws or journalistic rules when he attempted to inteview one of these 'hunters' at his home in the morning time. The response, as seen in today's video, was that the journalist was verbally assaulted in the street later that night by a large gang of these 'hunters' who behaved like vicious animals. One could even be heard calling Magee "a pedo f**k" as they sat on the road blocking his car (along with a whole street of traffic). During the course of the confrontation, they repeatedly shouted about how they are only interested in 'protecting kids', while they simultaneously walked the streets shouting foul mouth obscenities at Magee - not much concern for the innocence of any kids in the vicinity there. They even made a claim that Magee, when he visited the man's house, was protected by men with balaclavas, even though the man's own video clearly showed the two BBC men with Magee at the house, and neither of them were wearing balaclavas.

longballin

Quote from: Snapchap on February 07, 2018, 02:21:38 PM
Never feel all that at ease seeing the videos of these groups.

Why they are maybe a good idea:
1. It's great to expose pedophiles

2. While there may not be many convictions following these stings, at least the public is shown who these pedophiles are. Without these groups, a lot of these pedophiles might not only never be convicted, but might never be even suspected/investigated.


Why I don't like these groups:
1. While they probably bring pedophiles to public attention who would otherwise have never even have been suspected, they probably do more harm than good when it comes to getting these people convicted.

2. The manner in which they behave during their 'stings'. They claim to be on the side of professionalism and decency and be solely motivated by a desire to protect children, yet their videos (which are easily accessible to children) are FULL of vile, sexually explicit language.

3. They seem to be motivated as much by their own self image and egos as anything else. In a lot of their videos it's not enough to tell someone they have evidence that shows they were attempting to groom children and inform them that the police are on the way - they seem to absolutely revel in talking about how they are protecting kids and even asking the accused if they want to thank them for what they are doing etc.

3. They, it seems, have wrongly accused people in the past. Can you for one second imagine one of these groups wrongly accusing you, in SUCH a public fashion, of being a pedophile? That is life destroying.

4. They state when they post videos that people should not attack the family of the accused or their property, but there are countless reports of people doing just that. They then wash their hands of any responsibility for that. That does not sit right with me.

5. The video this morning/last night of them verbally abusing the BBC's Kevin Magee was just sick and really exposed the members of this particular 'hunter' gang as nothing but a gang of absolute thugs and scumbags. The journalist in question broke no laws or journalistic rules when he attempted to inteview one of these 'hunters' at his home in the morning time. The response, as seen in today's video, was that the journalist was verbally assaulted in the street later that night by a large gang of these 'hunters' who behaved like vicious animals. One could even be heard calling Magee "a pedo f**k" as they sat on the road blocking his car (along with a whole street of traffic). During the course of the confrontation, they repeatedly shouted about how they are only interested in 'protecting kids', while they simultaneously walked the streets shouting foul mouth obscenities at Magee - not much concern for the innocence of any kids in the vicinity there. They even made a claim that Magee, when he visited the man's house, was protected by men with balaclavas, even though the man's own video clearly showed the two BBC men with Magee at the house, and neither of them were wearing balaclavas.

Excellent post. I was undecided for a while but now see they are a shower of egotistical thugs

The Gs Man

Quote from: Snapchap on February 07, 2018, 02:21:38 PM
Never feel all that at ease seeing the videos of these groups.

Why they are maybe a good idea:
1. It's great to expose pedophiles

2. While there may not be many convictions following these stings, at least the public is shown who these pedophiles are. Without these groups, a lot of these pedophiles might not only never be convicted, but might never be even suspected/investigated.


Why I don't like these groups:
1. While they probably bring pedophiles to public attention who would otherwise have never even have been suspected, they probably do more harm than good when it comes to getting these people convicted.

2. The manner in which they behave during their 'stings'. They claim to be on the side of professionalism and decency and be solely motivated by a desire to protect children, yet their videos (which are easily accessible to children) are FULL of vile, sexually explicit language.

3. They seem to be motivated as much by their own self image and egos as anything else. In a lot of their videos it's not enough to tell someone they have evidence that shows they were attempting to groom children and inform them that the police are on the way - they seem to absolutely revel in talking about how they are protecting kids and even asking the accused if they want to thank them for what they are doing etc.

3. They, it seems, have wrongly accused people in the past. Can you for one second imagine one of these groups wrongly accusing you, in SUCH a public fashion, of being a pedophile? That is life destroying.

4. They state when they post videos that people should not attack the family of the accused or their property, but there are countless reports of people doing just that. They then wash their hands of any responsibility for that. That does not sit right with me.

5. The video this morning/last night of them verbally abusing the BBC's Kevin Magee was just sick and really exposed the members of this particular 'hunter' gang as nothing but a gang of absolute thugs and scumbags. The journalist in question broke no laws or journalistic rules when he attempted to inteview one of these 'hunters' at his home in the morning time. The response, as seen in today's video, was that the journalist was verbally assaulted in the street later that night by a large gang of these 'hunters' who behaved like vicious animals. One could even be heard calling Magee "a pedo f**k" as they sat on the road blocking his car (along with a whole street of traffic). During the course of the confrontation, they repeatedly shouted about how they are only interested in 'protecting kids', while they simultaneously walked the streets shouting foul mouth obscenities at Magee - not much concern for the innocence of any kids in the vicinity there. They even made a claim that Magee, when he visited the man's house, was protected by men with balaclavas, even though the man's own video clearly showed the two BBC men with Magee at the house, and neither of them were wearing balaclavas.

Great post.  Sums up my thoughts exactly.
Keep 'er lit

paddyjohn

#718
Quote from: Snapchap on February 07, 2018, 02:21:38 PM
Never feel all that at ease seeing the videos of these groups.

Why they are maybe a good idea:
1. It's great to expose pedophiles

2. While there may not be many convictions following these stings, at least the public is shown who these pedophiles are. Without these groups, a lot of these pedophiles might not only never be convicted, but might never be even suspected/investigated.


Why I don't like these groups:
1. While they probably bring pedophiles to public attention who would otherwise have never even have been suspected, they probably do more harm than good when it comes to getting these people convicted.

2. The manner in which they behave during their 'stings'. They claim to be on the side of professionalism and decency and be solely motivated by a desire to protect children, yet their videos (which are easily accessible to children) are FULL of vile, sexually explicit language.

3. They seem to be motivated as much by their own self image and egos as anything else. In a lot of their videos it's not enough to tell someone they have evidence that shows they were attempting to groom children and inform them that the police are on the way - they seem to absolutely revel in talking about how they are protecting kids and even asking the accused if they want to thank them for what they are doing etc.

3. They, it seems, have wrongly accused people in the past. Can you for one second imagine one of these groups wrongly accusing you, in SUCH a public fashion, of being a pedophile? That is life destroying.

4. They state when they post videos that people should not attack the family of the accused or their property, but there are countless reports of people doing just that. They then wash their hands of any responsibility for that. That does not sit right with me.

5. The video this morning/last night of them verbally abusing the BBC's Kevin Magee was just sick and really exposed the members of this particular 'hunter' gang as nothing but a gang of absolute thugs and scumbags. The journalist in question broke no laws or journalistic rules when he attempted to inteview one of these 'hunters' at his home in the morning time. The response, as seen in today's video, was that the journalist was verbally assaulted in the street later that night by a large gang of these 'hunters' who behaved like vicious animals. One could even be heard calling Magee "a pedo f**k" as they sat on the road blocking his car (along with a whole street of traffic). During the course of the confrontation, they repeatedly shouted about how they are only interested in 'protecting kids', while they simultaneously walked the streets shouting foul mouth obscenities at Magee - not much concern for the innocence of any kids in the vicinity there. They even made a claim that Magee, when he visited the man's house, was protected by men with balaclavas, even though the man's own video clearly showed the two BBC men with Magee at the house, and neither of them were wearing balaclavas.

Best post on here in a long time.

general_lee

Quote from: RedHand88 on February 07, 2018, 01:24:55 PM
The way they pulled the rasharkin boy out of the house and lined him up at the front. How hard do you think it will be for his solicitor to quash any possible conviction?
People they sting are under no obligation to stay put when they place them under citizens arrest. They quote "section 24a blah blah blah" of some English law that doesn't apply here. So they are arguably guilty of false imprisonment. Then again they say they aren't concerned about the law, they demonstrated as much last night with their behaviour with the BBC reporter