Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Milltown Row2

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 2065
1
GAA Discussion / Re: Should An Glenn object?
« on: Today at 03:56:31 PM »
Iíve come to this debate late so apologies if this point has already been raised: Surely there is an onus on the referee to ensure that a replaced player has actually left the field BEFORE he restarts the game?

Apparently not ya stupid door  ;)  (that's not directed at you just in case someone comes on and calls ya that)

2
GAA Discussion / Re: Should An Glenn object?
« on: Today at 02:35:06 PM »
Difficult situation but forget about everything else - one team needed a goal in the last play and the other team put a 16th man in the middle of the goals for the last play. Would any team sit back and allow that to pass by and say nothing

If Mullen had gone off then someone else would have gone back on the line.

There's plenty of clubs who wouldn't have objected.

Don't think he was in the middle of the goals either, by the post on the side were the ball didn't go, so not involved  ;D
He was on the line, reducing goal exposure , freeing up capacity for someone outfield. What happens with 16 v 15.

We can wrap up this thread, there isnít going to be a replay even if the gaa award one. Glen donít want it and neither do crokes.

What a waste of the year that's been if it turns out to be null and void... WOW

3
GAA Discussion / Re: Jack McCarron
« on: Today at 01:30:51 PM »
Disgrace tbh. Was there a fall out or why did his own club let him go?

Its not prison, not contracted to stay and he's going into a different county

Different county??  :o

Sorry was getting that mixed up with Cathal  ;D

4
GAA Discussion / Re: Jack McCarron
« on: Today at 01:26:53 PM »
Disgrace tbh. Was there a fall out or why did his own club let him go?

Its not prison, not contracted to stay and he's going into a different county

5
GAA Discussion / Re: Should An Glenn object?
« on: Today at 01:16:34 PM »
Difficult situation but forget about everything else - one team needed a goal in the last play and the other team put a 16th man in the middle of the goals for the last play. Would any team sit back and allow that to pass by and say nothing

If Mullen had gone off then someone else would have gone back on the line.

There's plenty of clubs who wouldn't have objected.

Don't think he was in the middle of the goals either, by the post on the side were the ball didn't go, so not involved  ;D

6
GAA Discussion / Re: Should An Glenn object?
« on: Today at 01:04:21 PM »
So McEntee got two yellows and stayed on the pitch and Cross won the final.. but I suppose that was before Twitter

No its because Cross won comfortably, Crokes didn't and no one will ever know the outcome in that last period without that extra player they had, who was standing on the goal line.

So breaking the rules regardless of the score is ok? Hmm wasn't getting that from the previous posts

Wasnt it up to the ref to show him a red? Im sure McEntee would have went off if he was shown a red card

He's not thick like!! I mean 2 yellows doesn't mean play on lol.. He basically cheated by staying on, is it up to his team to take him off knowing it also? BC1 could fill us in  ;D

Maybe he thought his twin got the first one haha

Must have also changed the number on his back too ;)

7
GAA Discussion / Re: Should An Glenn object?
« on: Today at 12:03:32 PM »
So McEntee got two yellows and stayed on the pitch and Cross won the final.. but I suppose that was before Twitter

No its because Cross won comfortably, Crokes didn't and no one will ever know the outcome in that last period without that extra player they had, who was standing on the goal line.

So breaking the rules regardless of the score is ok? Hmm wasn't getting that from the previous posts

Wasnt it up to the ref to show him a red? Im sure McEntee would have went off if he was shown a red card

He's not thick like!! I mean 2 yellows doesn't mean play on lol.. He basically cheated by staying on, is it up to his team to take him off knowing it also? BC1 could fill us in  ;D

8
GAA Discussion / Re: Should An Glenn object?
« on: Today at 12:01:49 PM »
Difficult situation but forget about everything else - one team needed a goal in the last play and the other team put a 16th man in the middle of the goals for the last play. Would any team sit back and allow that to pass by and say nothing

No and neither should have Dr Crokes but hey ho they just got on with the result, this was the rematch after the drawn game with your man took 25 steps before scoring the leveler ;D

9
GAA Discussion / Re: Should An Glenn object?
« on: Today at 11:47:18 AM »
Former ref Maurice Deegan on the mess and what sort of changes may ne necessary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b15gLkEs7eE&t=3420s

He was as clear as mud!!

10
GAA Discussion / Re: Should An Glenn object?
« on: Today at 11:45:49 AM »
So McEntee got two yellows and stayed on the pitch and Cross won the final.. but I suppose that was before Twitter

No its because Cross won comfortably, Crokes didn't and no one will ever know the outcome in that last period without that extra player they had, who was standing on the goal line.

It was a draw at the time of the sending off - no one will ever know the outcome in that last 10 minutes without the extra player Cross had, who was arguably their best forward.

Not sure why people are comparing this.
The referee didnt send the player off - this is down to one individual error.

KC had 16 players on the field due to a number of errors. Referee, linesman, KC officials, player entering the field, player not leaving the field (if indeed he knew he was to be taken off)

It's been compared as it is a similar event. You could fire a number of your errors you listed in with what happened to McEntee too, e.g. Cross officials, player not leaving the field. So it's inaccurate to say that was due to only one error. And what has the number of errors got to do with it anyway?

Could you then say that McEntee then cheated, cause he knew he had 2 yellows but decided to stay on?

11
GAA Discussion / Re: Should An Glenn object?
« on: Today at 11:38:26 AM »
So McEntee got two yellows and stayed on the pitch and Cross won the final.. but I suppose that was before Twitter

No its because Cross won comfortably, Crokes didn't and no one will ever know the outcome in that last period without that extra player they had, who was standing on the goal line.

So breaking the rules regardless of the score is ok? Hmm wasn't getting that from the previous posts

12
General discussion / Re: China Coronavirus
« on: Today at 11:37:00 AM »
I did find the most up to date data on New Zealand, found it quite quickly while I was having a cuppa with a coulple of hobnobs

The next date to release the latest data below: Wasn't as difficult as he made out lol

Births and deaths: Year ended December 2022 will be released on 20 February 2023.

13
GAA Discussion / Re: Should An Glenn object?
« on: Today at 09:16:42 AM »
Is this not weíre Brollys point was relevant that OíRourke isnít a Glen man and could potentially manage KC in the future?
I think that's overthinking it. He was asked in the spur of the moment and he couldn't speak on behalf of the club given what had happened.

You've been over thinking a lot recently  ;D

14
General discussion / Re: China Coronavirus
« on: Today at 09:13:43 AM »
Heís not saying anything but there is a disturbing signal that the chief medical officer etc is not talking about. We should be getting an acknowledgment at least and some information on whatís being done about it, not head in the sand stuff.

To be fair there was nearly one more excess death after watching!!

The hospital service at the minute is crazy, I know this first hand as the mother in law is going through a awful time of it, waiting times to be seen the other night was 20 hours, 12 hour waits on ambulance services, was watching a show on dogs last night, there was a girl on and she picked up covid at the start and has never recovered from it, she was 24, she's using a wheel chair to get around so if the elderly had caught it they may not have died straight away or in the the after months.. We've had 2 cold snaps recently and a cost of living crisis, people haven't the money to put the heat on...

We have a huge elderly population that is not being cared for properly dues to on going restrictions... IF and its a big if, if the vaccines were killing people, surely the rate would be a hell of a lot higher that 10%?

15
General discussion / Re: China Coronavirus
« on: Today at 08:59:11 AM »
Thereís more to it than the covid wave.
https://youtu.be/av4Ej6om0WI

Did get to the end.. But is he saying that people are dying because of the vaccines?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 2065