Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - T Fearon

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 804
16
General discussion / Re: Death Notices
« on: January 15, 2018, 05:53:49 PM »
Gone to the Faithful Departed

17
General discussion / Re: Death Notices
« on: January 15, 2018, 02:04:09 PM »
Hopefully it wasn't second degree murder.


Btw it was Justin Fashanu who scored that cracker against Liverpool for Norwich.

18
General discussion / Re: The OFFICIAL FAI Thread.....Roll on France 2016
« on: January 14, 2018, 11:46:14 PM »
O Neill and Keane have turned down Stoke's offer.Still reckon they'd be away if the right offer with a long term contract came up in England.

19
General discussion / Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« on: January 14, 2018, 11:44:04 PM »
Who is to blame? I'm afraid it is the sc**bag father trying to groom children.They go to great lengths to protect the relatives of these scumbags,making sure they are not featured on camera and telling people not to show up and that the relatives are innocent.

This phenomenon is only going to grow,it certainly won't go away,so get used to it.Its effectiveness has been proven,like everything else it is not perfect

20
General discussion / Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« on: January 14, 2018, 11:05:17 PM »
I agree with you.All paedophiles,including those masquerading as clerics,in any era,should have had no hiding place.

21
General discussion / Re: Killarney Economic Conference
« on: January 14, 2018, 11:03:44 PM »
It is not so long ago that in the free state,hotels had every flag on display (of EU nations and USA) except the butcher's apron.In fact I remember a Unionist orientated commentator moaning about this fact in his regular column in the Belfast Telegraph

22
General discussion / Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« on: January 14, 2018, 11:01:00 PM »
The sc**bag brought them to their door,and they do make it clear the family are completely innocent and that people should stay away.

I have absolutely no problem with what they're doing,from what I've seen it is within the law.

In fact I'd like to see more vigilante/community volunteering groups like these,operating within the law, helping for example to prevent scum breaking into elderly people's homes etc.

23
General discussion / Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« on: January 14, 2018, 10:22:30 PM »
What don't you like about the public humiliation of people who turn up to meet what they think are children who they have been grooming,prior to handing them over along with concrete evidence to the Police.

24
General discussion / Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« on: January 14, 2018, 10:07:17 PM »
I never have,don't and never will defend paedophiles and fully support all efforts to identify them within legal means by all groups and individuals,statutory agencies or volunteers

25
General discussion / Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« on: January 14, 2018, 09:39:04 PM »
These groups do no physical harm and act without fear or favour

26
General discussion / Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« on: January 14, 2018, 09:06:21 PM »
If the Police announced a Tony Fearon has been arrested and charged with grooming a child I'd run the exact same risk of mistaken identity.

From the videos I've seen these groups are practically professional in evidence gathering etc.As long as they don't overstep the mark I do not have a problem

27
General discussion / Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« on: January 14, 2018, 08:23:41 PM »
Lynch mobs lynch.These groups rightly set traps for paedophiles,snare them,expose them to the general public and hand them over,unharmed,along with overwhelming evidence to the Police.

This has worked very well in the case of an RTE Sports producer and led him to losing his job and shortly a custodial sentence.If these groups didn't exist,this guy would never have been caught.

28
General discussion / Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« on: January 14, 2018, 08:11:47 PM »
I can only go by the videos I've seen which without exception have featured

1.Well documented evidence

2.Assuring the culprit will not be harmed.

3.Giving the culprit a chance to offer a feasible explanation

4.Await the arrival of the Police.

As long as these are maintained I have no problem.Neither have I a problem with aggressive questioning or watching the humiliation of guilty people.

29
General discussion / Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« on: January 14, 2018, 05:30:23 PM »
So like the Police they make mistakes (but far fewer than the Police).

The Police get relatively few convictions,on account a lot of the time, of their own c**k ups.

These groups are exposing paedophiles who have groomed what they thought to be children, so people know who they are and can take steps to protect their children.I for one support this fully.

30
General discussion / Re: Silent Justice/ Internet Interceptors
« on: January 14, 2018, 02:15:21 PM »
Do it for self promotion, yet they assume false names and keep themselves well off camera!😂😂😂😂😂 Some totally stupid people here.

More like they're showing the useless police up. As I say they are shaming paedophiles and fully exposing them,giving good warning to the public at large,regardless whether  the useless police and farcical legal system ultimately fail to get a conviction.That's their main benefit.They have enormous public support,to the  extent now if the were banned there'd be a General Public outcry.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 804