The Sigerson is an absolute joke. Kevin McGourty playing for UCD? Last I heard he was helping organize Fianna Fail in Down. Brian Cullen in DCU? How long has Johnston been at DCU?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: pintsofguinness on February 10, 2010, 06:13:27 PMQuote from: gallsman on February 10, 2010, 05:36:47 PMaye but that's about it.Quote from: pintsofguinness on February 09, 2010, 07:59:48 PMQuote from: Tony Baloney on February 09, 2010, 07:55:32 PMI think taken aback would be a reasonable enough emotion? Disapointed? I can say with certainty I wouldn't be disappointed. I still don't understand what exactly yous are disappointed about.
I find it very hard to believe that any man on this board, or in Ireland for that matter, would not be taken aback and disappointed if they found out their son was gay. If you say it wouldn't annoy you in the slightest then I'd call you a liar.
I would have no problems whatsoever with any of my sons taking home woman of any colour.
No grandchildren for one.Quote from: gallsman on February 10, 2010, 06:10:24 PMwe've been through this on the board before and I've yet to hear one good reason why they shouldn't.Quote from: ludermor on February 10, 2010, 05:38:46 PM
They could adopt or buy a kid in africa like Madonna
That brings up a separate issue. Are you homophobic if you disagree with homosexual couples raising children? I know I don't agree with it, yet I don't consider myself homophobic and happen to have several gay friends.
In fact every argument used would have been used against single parent families 20 years ago.
Quote from: ludermor on February 10, 2010, 05:38:46 PM
They could adopt or buy a kid in africa like Madonna
Quote from: pintsofguinness on February 09, 2010, 07:59:48 PMQuote from: Tony Baloney on February 09, 2010, 07:55:32 PMI think taken aback would be a reasonable enough emotion? Disapointed? I can say with certainty I wouldn't be disappointed. I still don't understand what exactly yous are disappointed about.
I find it very hard to believe that any man on this board, or in Ireland for that matter, would not be taken aback and disappointed if they found out their son was gay. If you say it wouldn't annoy you in the slightest then I'd call you a liar.
I would have no problems whatsoever with any of my sons taking home woman of any colour.
Quote from: tyssam5 on February 09, 2010, 05:06:15 PMQuote from: gallsman on February 09, 2010, 02:41:23 PM
This Olly chap appears to be something of a sanctimonious ****. Read into that what you will. It's not personal abuse if you don't know what it says.
Wouldn't care in the slightest if kids came home with boyfriends or girlfriends of a different skin colour. As long as we're not talking about gangbangers or drug dealers or the like.
If a son or daughter was gay would I feel disappointed? Yes. Would it mean I loved the any less? No.
Top quality bit of non-racism there!
Quote from: ziggysego on February 09, 2010, 02:54:31 PMQuote from: gallsman on February 09, 2010, 02:52:04 PM
Of course you can't help it if they're not naturally intelligent, but would you not hope that they would grow up to be intelligent and successful?
There's a difference between being disappointed in the child and disappointed that they didn't manage to fulfil all your hopes and dreams.
That's why I said I've been disappointed if they are stupid because they are a waster.
Quote from: ziggysego on February 09, 2010, 02:42:41 PMQuote from: Larry Duff on February 09, 2010, 02:40:40 PM
All those statements are true, those are just things I would prefer him not to be. Am I a bigot? If I left out the first one am I a bigot?
I'd only be disappointed if he was a waster. I'd be disappointed if he was stupid, because he was a waster. Other than that, I wouldn't be disappointed.
Quote from: Olly on February 09, 2010, 02:03:46 PMQuote from: haranguerer on February 09, 2010, 01:34:40 PM
Well, for one - you say your own club has suffered from Galls lifting players from them - who exactly?
I'm not naming underage kids to you no way not on a forum. What are the rest of the questions?
Quote from: Billys Boots on February 04, 2010, 04:51:20 PM
As a neutral, I see no reason why any of gallsman's four are in any way more deserving of the 'legend' title than Nallen. In fact, I'd rate Nallen higher than any of them - and that's no disrespect to any of them; fine sportsmen to a man.
Quote from: IolarCoisCuain on February 04, 2010, 03:58:58 PMQuote from: gallsman on February 04, 2010, 03:27:34 PMQuote from: IolarCoisCuain on February 04, 2010, 01:29:07 PMQuote from: gallsman on February 04, 2010, 12:33:37 PMQuote from: IolarCoisCuain on February 02, 2010, 03:03:18 PMQuote from: gallsman on February 02, 2010, 01:49:33 PMQuote from: IolarCoisCuain on February 02, 2010, 01:45:20 PMQuote from: gallsman on February 02, 2010, 01:31:48 PM
Great servant to Mayo and a good footballer.
He's no legend though.
Can you define legend Gallsman? Just so we're sure.
Can you?
My idea of legend would include names such as Jack O'Shea, Pat Spillane, Sean O'Neill, Colm O'Rourke or Peter Canavan.
Would you honestly place James Nallen in that kind of company?
I can, yes. My idea of a legend is at odds with your own.
A legend was well defined by a friend of mine from Roscommon who told me about what it was like when his father would bend down to him as a child and say "that's Harry Keegan across the road." Harry Keegan didn't win as many All-Ireland medals as the lads you name, but whenever my friend saw that man around the town he'd involuntarily throw back the shoulders and straighten his back.
So I would define a legend as being the man that fathers point out to their sons as examplars of all that's good and great and worth aspiring too. It casts a wider net, of course, but I'm happy enough with it, and very happy to include James Nallen among that number.
BTW, it's interesting that you name two Kerrymen in there with seven and eight All-Irelands each. One thing that's always interested me about Kerry is that their two most legendary figures, Mick O'Connell and Maurice Fitzgerald, were men who were on relatively unsuccessful Kerry teams. Obviously, that's a qualification that only Kerry can afford to make, but still. It's interesting to see how they define it. More to it than the medals, like.
Canavan only has the two and I mentioned him. I'd also mention someone like Kieran McGeeney who only has one. I gave a few brief examples. If you want a detailed list of every player I consider a legend from 1884 on, I'll get back to you in a few days.
That's not the point I was trying to make Gallsman. Canavan has as many All-Ireland medals as any other Tyroneman, living or dead. In Kerry, you can have a fist of them and still be considered nothing special. Everyone on your list has an All-Ireland medal so I'm just wondering if this is how you judge a player. Are there any players to whom you would accord legendary status who haven't won an All-Ireland senior medal?
Colin Corkery
Anthony Lynch
Ciaran Barr
Tony Browne
Cheers Gallsman, fantastic. Great players all. And one them even a hurler.
So, if you can tell me why each of those is a legend and James Nallen isn't, why those fellas cross the line for you and James Nallen doesn't, we'll finally have settled the issue.
Quote from: IolarCoisCuain on February 04, 2010, 01:29:07 PMQuote from: gallsman on February 04, 2010, 12:33:37 PMQuote from: IolarCoisCuain on February 02, 2010, 03:03:18 PMQuote from: gallsman on February 02, 2010, 01:49:33 PMQuote from: IolarCoisCuain on February 02, 2010, 01:45:20 PMQuote from: gallsman on February 02, 2010, 01:31:48 PM
Great servant to Mayo and a good footballer.
He's no legend though.
Can you define legend Gallsman? Just so we're sure.
Can you?
My idea of legend would include names such as Jack O'Shea, Pat Spillane, Sean O'Neill, Colm O'Rourke or Peter Canavan.
Would you honestly place James Nallen in that kind of company?
I can, yes. My idea of a legend is at odds with your own.
A legend was well defined by a friend of mine from Roscommon who told me about what it was like when his father would bend down to him as a child and say "that's Harry Keegan across the road." Harry Keegan didn't win as many All-Ireland medals as the lads you name, but whenever my friend saw that man around the town he'd involuntarily throw back the shoulders and straighten his back.
So I would define a legend as being the man that fathers point out to their sons as examplars of all that's good and great and worth aspiring too. It casts a wider net, of course, but I'm happy enough with it, and very happy to include James Nallen among that number.
BTW, it's interesting that you name two Kerrymen in there with seven and eight All-Irelands each. One thing that's always interested me about Kerry is that their two most legendary figures, Mick O'Connell and Maurice Fitzgerald, were men who were on relatively unsuccessful Kerry teams. Obviously, that's a qualification that only Kerry can afford to make, but still. It's interesting to see how they define it. More to it than the medals, like.
Canavan only has the two and I mentioned him. I'd also mention someone like Kieran McGeeney who only has one. I gave a few brief examples. If you want a detailed list of every player I consider a legend from 1884 on, I'll get back to you in a few days.
That's not the point I was trying to make Gallsman. Canavan has as many All-Ireland medals as any other Tyroneman, living or dead. In Kerry, you can have a fist of them and still be considered nothing special. Everyone on your list has an All-Ireland medal so I'm just wondering if this is how you judge a player. Are there any players to whom you would accord legendary status who haven't won an All-Ireland senior medal?