On this day, 105 years ago, RMS Titanic sank with a loss of 1500 souls, including some of the wealthiest people in the world.All because Harland and Wolff used grade 3 rivets instead of grade 4.
Quote from: armaghniac on April 15, 2017, 05:39:43 PMOn this day, 105 years ago, RMS Titanic sank with a loss of 1500 souls, including some of the wealthiest people in the world.All because Harland and Wolff used grade 3 rivets instead of grade 4. Not completely true
The rivets would have been OK if the ship had not a fire in the coal bunker and/or not sailed into an iceberg.
Quote from: Owen Brannigan on April 15, 2017, 08:27:53 PMThe rivets would have been OK if the ship had not a fire in the coal bunker and/or not sailed into an iceberg.The extent of the fire is open to debate. The point about the iceberg is well made though, if they had travelled a couple of knots more slowly, as conditions required, the Titanic would have been unknown except as a footnote in the history of H&W.
Unknown as the biggest liner of its time...thousands of other unknown ships built in the yard, this wasn't one of them, irrespective of the sinking and loss of 1500 souls
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on April 15, 2017, 08:49:11 PMUnknown as the biggest liner of its time...thousands of other unknown ships built in the yard, this wasn't one of them, irrespective of the sinking and loss of 1500 soulsAs the middle child, the Titanic would not have been particularly remembered. It was only marginally larger than the Olympic due to a few small changes ot make it harder to sink, the old lags in the shipyard always reckoned the Olympic was the better ship (being the first). But the Olympic would not be much remembered either, outside H&W, had the Titanic not sank.
Quote from: armaghniac on April 15, 2017, 09:45:42 PMQuote from: Milltown Row2 on April 15, 2017, 08:49:11 PMUnknown as the biggest liner of its time...thousands of other unknown ships built in the yard, this wasn't one of them, irrespective of the sinking and loss of 1500 soulsAs the middle child, the Titanic would not have been particularly remembered. It was only marginally larger than the Olympic due to a few small changes ot make it harder to sink, the old lags in the shipyard always reckoned the Olympic was the better ship (being the first). But the Olympic would not be much remembered either, outside H&W, had the Titanic not sank.So it was the largest liner? And your bitterness is sad
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on April 15, 2017, 10:30:55 PMQuote from: armaghniac on April 15, 2017, 09:45:42 PMQuote from: Milltown Row2 on April 15, 2017, 08:49:11 PMUnknown as the biggest liner of its time...thousands of other unknown ships built in the yard, this wasn't one of them, irrespective of the sinking and loss of 1500 soulsAs the middle child, the Titanic would not have been particularly remembered. It was only marginally larger than the Olympic due to a few small changes ot make it harder to sink, the old lags in the shipyard always reckoned the Olympic was the better ship (being the first). But the Olympic would not be much remembered either, outside H&W, had the Titanic not sank.So it was the largest liner? And your bitterness is sadTo be honest that's a pathetic response to a point well researched and put across.
Quote from: trileacman on April 15, 2017, 11:20:13 PMQuote from: Milltown Row2 on April 15, 2017, 10:30:55 PMQuote from: armaghniac on April 15, 2017, 09:45:42 PMQuote from: Milltown Row2 on April 15, 2017, 08:49:11 PMUnknown as the biggest liner of its time...thousands of other unknown ships built in the yard, this wasn't one of them, irrespective of the sinking and loss of 1500 soulsAs the middle child, the Titanic would not have been particularly remembered. It was only marginally larger than the Olympic due to a few small changes ot make it harder to sink, the old lags in the shipyard always reckoned the Olympic was the better ship (being the first). But the Olympic would not be much remembered either, outside H&W, had the Titanic not sank.So it was the largest liner? And your bitterness is sadTo be honest that's a pathetic response to a point well researched and put across.Was it not the biggest liner of its time when built?? His point is simple, he's belittling something that was some achievement for Harlands, his well researched point on the sinking of the ship was missing many other factors, but you failed to pull him on that too, armaghnaic would admit to being a bitter person anyways