Been using blink about 6 months and have very few complaints. Occasionally a camera will take a while to access but I suspect that's more to do with my internet connection.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: trileacman on July 03, 2025, 01:30:45 PMQuote from: David McKeown on July 02, 2025, 06:39:48 PMQuote from: WeeDonns on July 02, 2025, 08:22:50 AMQuote from: David McKeown on July 01, 2025, 10:22:36 PMI see Liz Kimmins has indicated that there will be an appeal. Always possible that McAlinden J got the law wrong but given the content of the Judgement I am surprised by this course of action. Particularly as they have started to return the land and remove all the equipment/Could an appeal delay the return of land etc?
As someone has pointed out above, that process is going to cost a fortune ... a process that is then going to be reversed again in the future (hopefully) when DfI get their application sorted?
I'm not sure why the return of lands happened that wasn't the focus or an outcome of the original decision (unless I missed it)
The original decision struck out the vesting orders, therefore DFI, in the eyes of the law, are trespassing on land they don't own.
Quote from: Hereiam on July 03, 2025, 02:49:06 PMhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgwnxdx723o
This relatively new hospital to be used as nothing more than a health centre now. Some waste of money.
Quote from: WeeDonns on July 02, 2025, 08:22:50 AMQuote from: David McKeown on July 01, 2025, 10:22:36 PMI see Liz Kimmins has indicated that there will be an appeal. Always possible that McAlinden J got the law wrong but given the content of the Judgement I am surprised by this course of action. Particularly as they have started to return the land and remove all the equipment/Could an appeal delay the return of land etc?
As someone has pointed out above, that process is going to cost a fortune ... a process that is then going to be reversed again in the future (hopefully) when DfI get their application sorted?
Quote from: Duine Inteacht Eile on July 01, 2025, 09:29:07 PMGallagher isn't flying by the seat of his pants here.
Every nook and cranny of this will have been looked at by his legal team before deciding to proceed. It'll be very interesting to see how it works out.
He didn't take Stephen Maguire's wife for defamation?
This has been chosen as a winner.
Quote from: tiempo on July 01, 2025, 09:24:04 PMQuote from: ck on July 01, 2025, 08:41:08 PMIt's a silly move by Gallagher. Any case against the GAA will mean that they (GAA) will present all of the his court case details on his alleged domestic abuse. From what I hear that will not be pretty!
The reality is that is there was no contract with Naas and if he goes down that route he'll have to declare what he was promised. There is no case to answer here and Gallagher is on a hiding to nothing.
I'd hope the GAA would think twice before doing this, they need to engage proactively with the case and not the jackboot approach taken so far
Quote from: mackers on June 28, 2025, 09:26:14 PMQuote from: David McKeown on June 28, 2025, 09:04:14 PMIs the following correctDavid. Relax. We've plenty to be getting on with tomorrow.
If Meath and Armagh win then it's basically an open draw.
If Galway and either Armagh or Kerry win then Galway will play either Donegal or Tyrone and Armagh/Kerry winner will play the other.
If Meath and Kerry win then Meath will play either Tyrone or Donegal and Kerry will play the other?
Quote from: Orior on June 28, 2025, 08:39:18 PMThat was an entertaining afternoon.
If Armagh beat Kerry then I wouldn't fear anyone.