Midfield is a huge problem. I agree we have a star midfielder playing at fullback. I agree that he needs to be moved forward to midfield leaving the problem of who should play at fullback. What I don't understand is people's solutions. Why is everyone looking to find another defender to go in there? Presuming Dan moves forward and replaces Fitzpatrick or King (I'd prefer he replaces King) then why don't we just employ the replaced player at fullback? Just swap King for Gordon, King is an excellent catcher when the ball is coming straight at him and is good at getting rid of it to another red shirt, after that as a footballer he is limited. Isn't that the definition of a good fullback? Gordon's main strength at fullback is to nullify the aerial threat around the square, wouldn't King also do that. King's problem is the way opposition midfield's vary the location of the kick out so he isn't just catching in a small area. So why look for another fullback on the bench surely we have one on the field?