FAI...New Manager Hunt continues

Started by CĂșig huaire, November 19, 2009, 01:34:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Zulu

Quote from: AFS on October 15, 2013, 11:56:32 PM
Quote from: Zulu on October 15, 2013, 10:56:08 PM
RTE are spoofers and Noel King was dead right to call both O'Donoghue and the spoofers on their nonsense analysis.

All for anyone having a pop at the RTE comedy sketch, but King didn't pick his moment very well. The question that set him off was a perfectly reasonable one.

I don't think it was particularly reasonable. On top of the playing out of position question which followed on from the criticism of the German game he then asked about bringing on a winger earlier after a 3-1 win. There was clearly a two faced dig there and King called him on it straight away.

Opinions need to be informed and reasoned, once they are that if they are critical then fine. RTE's panel are neither reasoned or informed IMO.

AFS

Quote from: Zulu on October 16, 2013, 12:18:57 AM
Quote from: AFS on October 15, 2013, 11:56:32 PM
Quote from: Zulu on October 15, 2013, 10:56:08 PM
RTE are spoofers and Noel King was dead right to call both O'Donoghue and the spoofers on their nonsense analysis.

All for anyone having a pop at the RTE comedy sketch, but King didn't pick his moment very well. The question that set him off was a perfectly reasonable one.

I don't think it was particularly reasonable. On top of the playing out of position question which followed on from the criticism of the German game he then asked about bringing on a winger earlier after a 3-1 win. There was clearly a two faced dig there and King called him on it straight away.

Opinions need to be informed and reasoned, once they are that if they are critical then fine. RTE's panel are neither reasoned or informed IMO.

The question was fine. He played two strikers on the wings and was effectively asked why he chose to do this, particularly when there were very experienced natural wingers available for selection. That is not an unreasonable thing to want to know the answer to, and King should have been able to articulate a response without blowing up like he did.

He was clearly rattled by what the eejits had to say last Friday night, and had himself all geed up to defend his corner tonight. Unfortunately, he was so geed up that he exploded prematurely, before any further criticism had even emerged, handing the eejits more material with which to bash him. The whole interview was a bit of an own goal.

Zulu

We'll have to agree to disagree but IMO O'Donoghue knew exactly what he was at and was asking a loaded question. Managers shouldn't have to put up with rubbish criticism silently and King put them and O'Donoghue in their place tonight and fait dues to him for doing it.

INDIANA

Quote from: Zulu on October 16, 2013, 01:21:32 AM
We'll have to agree to disagree but IMO O'Donoghue knew exactly what he was at and was asking a loaded question. Managers shouldn't have to put up with rubbish criticism silently and King put them and O'Donoghue in their place tonight and fait dues to him for doing it.

KIng did nothing Zulu except make a tit of himself. He should watch amateur GAA managers field questions in a far better manner.

Unprofessional, out of his depth and proved why he was never a contender.

laoislad

It was obvious King was being set up. The toolbags in the panel wanted to have a go at him because King had a pop at them at the weekend. Whatever about Dunphy and Giles being knobs,Richard Sadlier has brought the level of gimpness to a whole new level imo.

When you think you're fucked you're only about 40% fucked.

Billys Boots

It was nice to see the side making an attempt to play modern football - the passing and build-up play was decent; we were really lacking a threat in the final third, though the opposition really parked the bus.  Not sure if the 'three strikers' system worked - thought he should have tried something different earlier. 
My hands are stained with thistle milk ...

Bingo

Quote from: INDIANA on October 16, 2013, 07:31:18 AM
Quote from: Zulu on October 16, 2013, 01:21:32 AM
We'll have to agree to disagree but IMO O'Donoghue knew exactly what he was at and was asking a loaded question. Managers shouldn't have to put up with rubbish criticism silently and King put them and O'Donoghue in their place tonight and fait dues to him for doing it.

KIng did nothing Zulu except make a tit of himself. He should watch amateur GAA managers field questions in a far better manner.

Unprofessional, out of his depth and proved why he was never a contender.

Ah yes, lets throw in the good old GAA manager as a bastion of righteous and professionalism when it comes to the media. Half of them don't even talk to the media.

Noel King knows he was never a contender, he went in to fill a gap and done that. He was ridiculed on the RTE panel and in papers by these people who haven't seen a tracksuit in donkey years. Dunphy was trying to justify his right to criticise him in the paper on Monday by saying he done his badges years ago when he was in England and that he'd been asked to manager the College of London, a very high profile role that Jimmy Hill had also been in. FFS.

Regards Ireland and this panel, you can't win. Trap was hounded cause he played wingers and ignored the magical andy reid and wes hoolohan. King comes in, gets rid of the wingers and tries to play more midfielders and attacking players and gets lamped cause Germany beat us 3-0 and we win 3-1. The formation that King was using is played by a lot premiership managers at the minute as it is so flexible.

If the pnel can't take it back, and King never refered to them, then they should focus on football analysis themselves.

muppet

In today's world of X-Factor, everything is about the panel and the hacks.

The rest is irrelevant.
MWWSI 2017

highorlow

QuoteHalf of them don't even talk to the media.

I know Mickey Harte is a class manager but......................
They get momentum, they go mad, here they go

Main Street

Quote from: INDIANA on October 16, 2013, 07:31:18 AM
Quote from: Zulu on October 16, 2013, 01:21:32 AM
We'll have to agree to disagree but IMO O'Donoghue knew exactly what he was at and was asking a loaded question. Managers shouldn't have to put up with rubbish criticism silently and King put them and O'Donoghue in their place tonight and fait dues to him for doing it.

KIng did nothing Zulu except make a tit of himself. He should watch amateur GAA managers field questions in a far better manner.

Unprofessional, out of his depth and proved why he was never a contender.
Yeah right Indiana  ::) 
Sure King was uptight but  he actually  gave a very good account of himself and irish football in the interview.
The panel were exposed as hypocritical, over sensitive morons, but all that probably went over your head.
King didn't pick the players that the panel wanted him to pick and last week King called  them comedy clowns. And last night was just another night when Tony, armed with best bits from the panel discussion, with the excitement of a kid let lose in a sweatshop, sticks the mike in front of the manager and by 2nd questions gets out his depth. If it was just this one time, then I'd say King overreacted but this has been an RTE tactic for ages, fronted by somebody who doesn't have a clue about his questions, except that he knows they are written in bold type on his clipboard.

Since when does a manager ever pick the team that everybody agrees with? What matters is what King tried to do with the players he did select.
Last night the team made near 600 passes, hardly a hoof in sight, fullbacks receiving the ball from the goalie, midfielders turning up to receive the ball, players making space for themselves and trying to do intelligent stuff. All exactly what the panel had been moaning about for years. King played a formation which is similar with the way the youth teams play, it's a football philosophy, something which Giles had been preaching but he couldn't recognise it, because he doesn't  watch irish underage football, he probably hasn't got a clue who is the director of Irish football or what he's trying to put into place. King knows him and works with him.
Then you had the moan of why not play McClean?  Same ol' same ol', some player not selected is transformed into Pele-like sainthood and should have been picked.  Stokes is supposed by the panel not to have played  in that position at Celtic, which is poppycock. Which team at intl level is playing with 2 wide players at midfield? In a 4231 you don't have 2 wide players in the 3.
Why do you think Kazakhstan have not got hammered in the games they played against Germany and Sweden? 1 nil 2 nil 3 nil results.

But somehow in the space of 5 days, Ireland are supposed to score more than Germany, change totally the way they have been playing football for the past 5 years and put together a sparkling passing game, and because the rookie stand-in manager King could not manage it to champagne perfection he was pilloried by the panel in a personal, nasty and disrespectful manner.


Billys Boots

My hands are stained with thistle milk ...

J OGorman

Quote from: Zulu on October 16, 2013, 12:18:57 AM
Quote from: AFS on October 15, 2013, 11:56:32 PM
Quote from: Zulu on October 15, 2013, 10:56:08 PM
RTE are spoofers and Noel King was dead right to call both O'Donoghue and the spoofers on their nonsense analysis.

All for anyone having a pop at the RTE comedy sketch, but King didn't pick his moment very well. The question that set him off was a perfectly reasonable one.

I don't think it was particularly reasonable. On top of the playing out of position question which followed on from the criticism of the German game he then asked about bringing on a winger earlier after a 3-1 win. There was clearly a two faced dig there and King called him on it straight away.

Opinions need to be informed and reasoned, once they are that if they are critical then fine. RTE's panel are neither reasoned or informed IMO.

hunner %..it was all very tabloidy. Fair play to Kinger. Match won, seeded in pot 2 for the next Euro's. If he had played a more sexy attacking approach and got beat, resulting in being seeded in pot 3, he might have ended up tarred and feathered. Giles and Dunphy had him hung out to dry before a ball was kicked in Germany. We lost more games than we won with Giles the expert as manager ffs. A pair of goats

Bingo

On another note, no harm to Dunphy but he looked rough last night and his speach was slow/slurred. Eyes very watery as well. Don't think it was drink but had the look of a man not well or on strong medication.

rodney trotter

Yeah, he looked white as a ghost.

It would be no harm if they removed Ronnie Whelan from commentary.

J OGorman

Quote from: rodney trotter on October 16, 2013, 11:01:33 AM
Yeah, he looked white as a ghost.

It would be no harm if they removed Ronnie Whelan from commentary.

Schweinsteiger