Armagh v Tyrone U20

Started by screenexile, June 09, 2018, 12:32:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

smelmoth

Anybody know the exact basis of the appeal? As in actual facts.

The issues of punishing the teams/ county boards and individuals appears to be entirely separate to this appeal. Is there any update on those punishments?

JoG2

Quote from: smelmoth on June 13, 2018, 01:12:30 PM
Anybody know the exact basis of the appeal? As in actual facts.

The issues of punishing the teams/ county boards and individuals appears to be entirely separate to this appeal. Is there any update on those punishments?

Tyrone are appealing on a technicality. Extra extra time is down as a continuation of extra time and not 'a new game' as per the rules. Even though both teams would have been happy enough to go back from 13 each to 15 (both obviously didn't know the rule or were happy enough to say nothing), Tyrone want the result scrapped on this technicality

bigtogs

Quote from: JoG2 on June 13, 2018, 01:20:13 PM
Quote from: smelmoth on June 13, 2018, 01:12:30 PM
Anybody know the exact basis of the appeal? As in actual facts.

The issues of punishing the teams/ county boards and individuals appears to be entirely separate to this appeal. Is there any update on those punishments?

Tyrone are appealing on a technicality. Extra extra time is down as a continuation of extra time and not 'a new game' as per the rules. Even though both teams would have been happy enough to go back from 13 each to 15 (both obviously didn't know the rule or were happy enough to say nothing), Tyrone want the result scrapped on this technicality
y


I heard today Ulster council owner custard Donnelly advised Tyrone on the ruling and his advise was wrong!!

JoG2

Quote from: bigtogs on June 13, 2018, 01:22:07 PM
Quote from: JoG2 on June 13, 2018, 01:20:13 PM
Quote from: smelmoth on June 13, 2018, 01:12:30 PM
Anybody know the exact basis of the appeal? As in actual facts.

The issues of punishing the teams/ county boards and individuals appears to be entirely separate to this appeal. Is there any update on those punishments?

Tyrone are appealing on a technicality. Extra extra time is down as a continuation of extra time and not 'a new game' as per the rules. Even though both teams would have been happy enough to go back from 13 each to 15 (both obviously didn't know the rule or were happy enough to say nothing), Tyrone want the result scrapped on this technicality
y


I heard today Ulster council owner custard Donnelly advised Tyrone on the ruling and his advise was wrong!!

Going on what was reported in the IN today 'togs

bigtogs

Quote from: JoG2 on June 13, 2018, 01:24:30 PM
Quote from: bigtogs on June 13, 2018, 01:22:07 PM
Quote from: JoG2 on June 13, 2018, 01:20:13 PM
Quote from: smelmoth on June 13, 2018, 01:12:30 PM
Anybody know the exact basis of the appeal? As in actual facts.

The issues of punishing the teams/ county boards and individuals appears to be entirely separate to this appeal. Is there any update on those punishments?

Tyrone are appealing on a technicality. Extra extra time is down as a continuation of extra time and not 'a new game' as per the rules. Even though both teams would have been happy enough to go back from 13 each to 15 (both obviously didn't know the rule or were happy enough to say nothing), Tyrone want the result scrapped on this technicality
y


I heard today Ulster council owner custard Donnelly advised Tyrone on the ruling and his advise was wrong!!

Going on what was reported in the IN today 'togs

Never seen IN today but the man that told me must be going by that!!

smelmoth

#95
Quote from: JoG2 on June 13, 2018, 01:20:13 PM
Quote from: smelmoth on June 13, 2018, 01:12:30 PM
Anybody know the exact basis of the appeal? As in actual facts.

The issues of punishing the teams/ county boards and individuals appears to be entirely separate to this appeal. Is there any update on those punishments?

Tyrone are appealing on a technicality. Extra extra time is down as a continuation of extra time and not 'a new game' as per the rules. Even though both teams would have been happy enough to go back from 13 each to 15 (both obviously didn't know the rule or were happy enough to say nothing), Tyrone want the result scrapped on this technicality

I wasn't at the game but was there not a delay before the start of extra extra time to get some clarity on that very point? Presumably Tyrone made their objections clear at that stage and played the extra extra time under protest??

I presume Tyrone accept that they have in no way been disadvantaged by the ref's ruling on the day?

Aaron Boone

Fairness dictates a replay.

Tony Baloney

Quote from: Aaron Boone on June 13, 2018, 01:48:52 PM
Fairness dictates a replay.
Of course you would not be saying this if the roles were reversed.

The Bearded One

At the end of extra time Armagh had a third player sent off (after the row and the equalising score). They commenced extra extra time with 15 players when they should have had 12 and Tyrone 13.
It is what it is. Presumably.

WT4E

Quote from: JoG2 on June 13, 2018, 01:20:13 PM
Quote from: smelmoth on June 13, 2018, 01:12:30 PM
Anybody know the exact basis of the appeal? As in actual facts.

The issues of punishing the teams/ county boards and individuals appears to be entirely separate to this appeal. Is there any update on those punishments?

Tyrone are appealing on a technicality. Extra extra time is down as a continuation of extra time and not 'a new game' as per the rules. Even though both teams would have been happy enough to go back from 13 each to 15 (both obviously didn't know the rule or were happy enough to say nothing), Tyrone want the result scrapped on this technicality

Armagh went from 12 to 15 and Tyrone from 13 to 15

outsideoftheboot

Quote from: The Bearded One on June 13, 2018, 02:01:27 PM
At the end of extra time Armagh had a third player sent off (after the row and the equalising score). They commenced extra extra time with 15 players when they should have had 12 and Tyrone 13.

I have stated this numerous times.. one argument above was that one of the players was already subbed off..

mackers

Quote from: Aaron Boone on June 13, 2018, 01:48:52 PM
Fairness dictates a replay.
We'll agree if you agree to replay the 03 AI final  ;)
Keep your pecker hard and your powder dry and the world will turn.

GJL


keeperlit

Quote from: The Bearded One on June 13, 2018, 02:01:27 PM
At the end of extra time Armagh had a third player sent off (after the row and the equalising score). They commenced extra extra time with 15 players when they should have had 12 and Tyrone 13.

Wrong. They had one player and a sub red carded before game resumed after row (14 vs 13). They then had a player sent of after the game resumed (about 15 seconds later) but before the equaliser (leaving it 13 vs 13).   

WT4E

Its all very confusing - no one seems to know what happened lets just have a replay!!!