IRA Undefeated apparently and brits are bad drivers....

Started by An Fear Rua, July 06, 2007, 10:00:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

GweylTah

Quote from: J70 on July 06, 2007, 01:35:27 PM
Some serious double standards on the part of some northern members here:

Gweyltah's posts bring a hail of condemnation and statements of intent to filter out his contributions, while 5Times' wish that the IRA had not shown restraint and confined themselves to "legitimate" targets is ignored.


I would take it as a compliment, and really very ironic given things like the Broadcasting Ban in the South and Thatcher's broadcasting rules in the UK and the campaign by republicans against these regulations and the victimhood card they played over the bans.

But, hey, I'll live with it - if people want to remain unenlightened and un-exposed to others' opinions, orientations, life-styles, home-truths, etc, let them stay in their lonely, reclusive and deluded world.

::)

An Fear Rua

Posting filter applied for user :GweylTah

This users posts are not displayed as they are on your blocked poster list.

You can add this user to your list in the Profile section



Obv where you lead others follow Lynchbhoy  ;D

Its Grim up North

magpie seanie

How do you do that? I went into my profile and couldn't work it out.

BTW - not for Gweyltah. There are many way worse around here.

Lamh Dhearg Alba

Quote from: lynchbhoy on July 06, 2007, 01:59:39 PM

with the installation of the martyred dead IRA republicans as 'Historic Irish heroes' a la Pearse , Connolly and the men of 1916 - being the final straw as they all jump ship and head back to rangersland -ooops sorry , meant scotland!
;) :D

Behave yourself >:( :o :P

Donagh

Fcuk sakes 5iveTimes that 'bombshell' wasn't long 'killing' off this thread.

:D

Main Street

There is a nice picture on page 37.  Soldier on rural patrol

SammyG

Quote from: Donagh on July 06, 2007, 02:34:58 PM
Fcuk sakes 5iveTimes that 'bombshell' wasn't long 'killing' off this thread.

:D

Aye you're right, sectarian slaughter is f**king hilarious.  ::)

Donagh

Quote from: SammyG on July 06, 2007, 02:39:39 PM
Aye you're right, sectarian slaughter is f**king hilarious.  ::)

That was never condoned on this thread.

Long time dead

Quote from: Donagh on July 06, 2007, 02:42:11 PM
Quote from: SammyG on July 06, 2007, 02:39:39 PM
Aye you're right, sectarian slaughter is f**king hilarious.  ::)

That was never condoned on this thread.

5ive Times did.


IMHO the IRA didnt go far enough, they tried to use legitimate targets such as Police, Army and genuine Loyalists, not some young lad standing on a street corner.

Donagh

Quote from: Long time dead on July 06, 2007, 02:49:21 PM
Quote from: Donagh on July 06, 2007, 02:42:11 PM
Quote from: SammyG on July 06, 2007, 02:39:39 PM
Aye you're right, sectarian slaughter is f**king hilarious.  ::)

That was never condoned on this thread.

5ive Times did.


IMHO the IRA didnt go far enough, they tried to use legitimate targets such as Police, Army and genuine Loyalists, not some young lad standing on a street corner.


I take it you didn't read the whole thread then

ziggysego

Quote from: J70 on July 06, 2007, 01:35:27 PM
Some serious double standards on the part of some northern members here:

Gweyltah's posts bring a hail of condemnation and statements of intent to filter out his contributions, while 5Times' wish that the IRA had not shown restraint and confined themselves to "legitimate" targets is ignored.

Well I have to admit, 5Time's comment did sit a little uneasy with me.
Testing Accessibility

Long time dead

Quote from: Donagh on July 06, 2007, 02:50:25 PM
Quote from: Long time dead on July 06, 2007, 02:49:21 PM
Quote from: Donagh on July 06, 2007, 02:42:11 PM
Quote from: SammyG on July 06, 2007, 02:39:39 PM
Aye you're right, sectarian slaughter is f**king hilarious.  ::)

That was never condoned on this thread.

5ive Times did.


IMHO the IRA didnt go far enough, they tried to use legitimate targets such as Police, Army and genuine Loyalists, not some young lad standing on a street corner.


I take it you didn't read the whole thread then

Why does it make this statement sound less like sanctioning sectarian slaughter?

Edit - his full post was Gweytafuck, exactly why are you a member of the GAA Board  It seems to me that every single one of your posts is meant to provoke a reaction. If the British army are admitting that they didnt defeat the IRA ( it was stalemate if you ask me) and the IRA are certainly winning the peace, what more do you need.
IMHO the IRA didnt go far enough, they tried to use legitimate targets such as Police, Army and genuine Loyalists, not some young lad standing on a street corner.


Was it a typo?

Main Street

QuoteThat was never condoned on this thread.

Quote from: Long time dead on July 06, 2007, 02:49:21 PM
5ive Times did.
IMHO the IRA didnt go far enough, they tried to use legitimate targets such as Police, Army and genuine Loyalists, not some young lad standing on a street corner.

No need to be so lazy
the obvious interpretation is that the IRA did not go that far

Has anybody read the Operation Banner?

I got up to page 40 so far.
I don't know what's new
Says that the RUC were ill equipped to deal with the Burntollet ambushers.  ::)
Says the Faulkner pulled the strings to introduce Internment - strongly opposed by the Army.




SammyG

Quote from: Donagh on July 06, 2007, 02:42:11 PM
Quote from: SammyG on July 06, 2007, 02:39:39 PM
Aye you're right, sectarian slaughter is f**king hilarious.  ::)

That was never condoned on this thread.

5Times said that the IRA didn't go far enough and that they should have targetted kids on street corners (presumably even more than they already did) and you made a joke out of it.

Donagh

Quote from: SammyG on July 06, 2007, 03:06:28 PM
Quote from: Donagh on July 06, 2007, 02:42:11 PM
Quote from: SammyG on July 06, 2007, 02:39:39 PM
Aye you're right, sectarian slaughter is f**king hilarious.  ::)

That was never condoned on this thread.

5Times said that the IRA didn't go far enough and that they should have targetted kids on street corners (presumably even more than they already did) and you made a joke out of it.

No he didn't and neither did I.