Was it not a square ball before the goal? I didn't get a second look at it.
edit . I see the goal was kosher
edit . I see the goal was kosher
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Hound on March 31, 2024, 06:00:53 PMUnfortunately for the rest of us I think the Dubs have more room for improvement.Quote from: Milltown Row2 on March 31, 2024, 05:50:09 PMContact was very minor, rarely gets awarded, otherwise there'd be a thousand frees a game.Quote from: joemamas on March 31, 2024, 05:47:44 PMQuote from: Milltown Row2 on March 31, 2024, 05:45:00 PMQuote from: Hound on March 31, 2024, 05:43:17 PMKey moment, bar the very soft penalty, was the Derry lad going for goal from a tight enough angle instead of tapping over and putting them in a probable unassailable 4 point lead.
What soft penalty? The one were he pulls his arms back when about to shoot?
He pushed him in the back as he was about to kick, clear penalty, Lane was 50 yards away from it.
Watch the replay the left arm was pulled back, not sure the push was the decision.
But clear penalty. For Lane to be 50 yards away he be at the midfield point, as play was leading towards the 21. He wasn't that far back
Funny how so many see the soft Dublin frees, but so few see the soft Derry frees 😄😄
Fair play to the Derry lads for really turning up. Hats off to them if they can pull it off, great preparation for the Dubs in any event. Lots to learn for both teams and both will improve as a result of this league final
Quote from: Eire90 on March 29, 2024, 07:52:53 PMallegations against enoch powell too a hero the british right wingThe Good Friday Teardown
Quote from: PadraicHenryPearse on March 26, 2024, 01:08:40 PMI think other countries are/have an equal ability at lying and propaganda and actually think they are better at it than the Russians. Russian propaganda seems very ineffective in that the whole western world doesn't believe a word they say.No, not the whole world
Having a Jewish president doesn't mean there isn't Nazis, look at Israeli actions. there is plenty of evidence of Nazis in Ukraine, the avoz battalion, plenty of articles from 2014 about them. to be clear that doesn't justify anything Russia has done but I know questioning anything on this topic other than war is great, ans more weapons for ukraine, gets labeled as kremlin spiel.
Quote"there is plenty of evidence of Nazis in Ukraine, the Azov battalion, plenty of articles from 2014 about them. to be clear that doesn't justify anything Russia"
Quote from: PadraicHenryPearse on March 25, 2024, 02:20:16 PMIt's an inane question to pose, who is the most reliable source, ISIS or Russia? I don't know about ISIS's reliability re their propagandaQuote from: Main Street on March 25, 2024, 11:53:02 AMQuote from: PadraicHenryPearse on March 25, 2024, 07:51:22 AMWhatabout whatabout, same old Kremlin spiel, you're a terrorist state therefore don't comment on our 100 year reign of terror inside Russia and inside the previously occupied nations of eastern Europe.Quote from: Main Street on March 25, 2024, 12:30:56 AMQuote from: PadraicHenryPearse on March 24, 2024, 05:09:21 PMWhat is your question? The Kremlin lies about everything, all of the time since inception.I offered a link to what AMAQ reported who have a reliable record of being accurate re ISIS stuff. I inserted "(allegedly)", perhaps you do not understand what alleged means?Quote from: Main Street on March 24, 2024, 04:47:05 PMAMAQ news (traditionally linked to ISIS) report on claims that the 4 man unit are very much alive.
The four people who killed over 170 Russians yesterday in a shopping mall in Moscow are doing fine.
While Russians show fake arrests near the border with Ukraine, the (allegedly) real commando is already thinking about the next target.
Main Street in terms of providing reliable information you have ISIS above Russia? No judgement, just a genuine question
Russia is a terrorist state.
I have a couple of questions now. One, is ISIS a more reliable news source than Russia in your opinion?
Russia is a terrorist state, what is ISIS? Israel? America, US, UK, etc.
Why don't you just apply same level of scrutiny to Russia's imperialism as you do to US war mongering The USA & UK lied through their backsides about Iraq, who's disputing that? What's your point, that Russia can therefore invade Ukraine and attempt to destroy a sovereign nation because that's the way of the world?
Russia is a mafia mob sadistic terrorist state, there is no communist party anymore the KGB have taken over total control.
.
you are putting loads of words in my mouth there... nowhere have I even hinted at anything you suggested.
It was two simple questions. Still not answered if you have ISIS as more reliable than Russia for information.
As people continually say Russia don't need a reason to carry out the attacks it does, its just an evil terrorist state, kgb run, sadistic mob etc. yet then there is speculation on false flags etc. and they are trying to create a narrative for something..
I hold them all to the same standard or try to but that isn't the same for those countries that can prevent a genocide for example, they chose to actively support it.
Quote from: PadraicHenryPearse on March 25, 2024, 07:51:22 AMWhatabout whatabout, same old Kremlin spiel, you're a terrorist state therefore don't comment on our 100 year reign of terror inside Russia and inside the previously occupied nations of eastern Europe.Quote from: Main Street on March 25, 2024, 12:30:56 AMQuote from: PadraicHenryPearse on March 24, 2024, 05:09:21 PMWhat is your question? The Kremlin lies about everything, all of the time since inception.I offered a link to what AMAQ reported who have a reliable record of being accurate re ISIS stuff. I inserted "(allegedly)", perhaps you do not understand what alleged means?Quote from: Main Street on March 24, 2024, 04:47:05 PMAMAQ news (traditionally linked to ISIS) report on claims that the 4 man unit are very much alive.
The four people who killed over 170 Russians yesterday in a shopping mall in Moscow are doing fine.
While Russians show fake arrests near the border with Ukraine, the (allegedly) real commando is already thinking about the next target.
Main Street in terms of providing reliable information you have ISIS above Russia? No judgement, just a genuine question
Russia is a terrorist state.
I have a couple of questions now. One, is ISIS a more reliable news source than Russia in your opinion?
Russia is a terrorist state, what is ISIS? Israel? America, US, UK, etc.
Quote from: PadraicHenryPearse on March 24, 2024, 05:09:21 PMWhat is your question? The Kremlin lies about everything, all of the time since inception.I offered a link to what AMAQ reported who have a reliable record of being accurate re ISIS stuff. I inserted "(allegedly)", perhaps you do not understand what alleged means?Quote from: Main Street on March 24, 2024, 04:47:05 PMAMAQ news (traditionally linked to ISIS) report on claims that the 4 man unit are very much alive.
The four people who killed over 170 Russians yesterday in a shopping mall in Moscow are doing fine.
While Russians show fake arrests near the border with Ukraine, the (allegedly) real commando is already thinking about the next target.
Main Street in terms of providing reliable information you have ISIS above Russia? No judgement, just a genuine question
Quote from: Itchy on March 23, 2024, 09:02:16 PMFalse equivalent, some pipeline sabotage versus mass murder of civilians.Quote from: Emmett Greene on March 23, 2024, 01:17:11 PMAnyway.. regardless of who is behind this attack, watch the Kremlin invent some tenuous link to Ukraine. It's already happening.
You are right, they will do that. Just like the gasline explosion was tenuously linked to Russia which is also bullshit.
Quote from: David McKeown on March 23, 2024, 06:46:44 PMThe DRA decision on over turning the suspension is illuminating on a lot that has been discussed here.Safeguarding issues do not apply to Rory Gallagher.
From memory (as I haven't read the decision since it was published) RG stood down voluntarily from Derry role shortly after the allegations surfaced. Ulster GAA initially incorrectly thought this was from all GAA roles and were subsequently slow to disbar him.
RG was disbarred through rules dealing with adult safeguarding which conflicted with and did not explicitly disallow the rules in the official guide (unlike the rules relating to child safeguarding). They were therefore void.
On a more general point. The GAA are duty bound to investigate any complaint about any member to the best of their ability if that complaint has the potential to raise safeguarding issues.
QuoteThe GAA are not bound by criminal court decisions where there is a higher burden of proof and will make all decisions on the balance of probabilities.[/quote]
Family courts are confidential and the GAA will not be given information in respect of them. The outcome of the family courts is largely irrelevant as a result. It was mentioned here that abusive fathers are more likely to get custody than unsuitable mothers. That isn't really accurate. It's not a zero sum equation. If the court has concerns over both parents it's more likely to place children into care or into the care of other suitable family members.
Quote from: bennydorano on March 23, 2024, 02:37:04 PM3 body problem on Netflix. Proper make you think Sci Fi, only 2 episodes in but I'm hooked.Looks interesting but I'll listen to the audio books first.
Quote from: JoG2 on March 23, 2024, 02:14:15 PMIt's the White Ribbon Charter that (at least) Ulster GAA has signed up toQuote from: tbrick18 on March 23, 2024, 01:47:21 PMQuote from: JoG2 on March 23, 2024, 01:41:35 PMQuote from: Main Street on March 23, 2024, 12:54:02 PMQuote from: general_lee on March 23, 2024, 11:26:07 AMWhen allegations of violence against women/kids are reported to the police and they start an investigation, then the GAA are obliged by charter to stand down the accused ntil the investigation is over. This did not happen in Nicola's case. RG was not stood down while the police investigated her allegations twice, sent the files on to the prosecutor where they were dropped. As it stands now for RG in the GAA code book world, he's free to take up any coaching appointment. I doubt if there is any process for investigating a breach of GAA ethics or what could even be defined as a breach. Possibly if there was an attack on a woman on GAA property?Quote from: nrico2006 on March 23, 2024, 09:53:54 AMWere DJ Carey, Gerard Cavlan or Darren Gleeson ever banned?Speaking of completely irrelevant tangents; and this is purely hypothetical here... but if allegations were to emerge of a former county player/county manager committing child abuse, what happens then?
If the alleged victim was to go public on social media with a lengthy post detailing allegations dating back 27 years, do we take it at face value or do we dismiss it as one person's word against another's?
On other matters,
a father accused of abuse being awarded custody of the kids is in itself not a vindication of the father, as the UK courts/social services (even when presented with believable testimony) are likely to deem a spouse abusing husband a safer bet than an addicted or alcohol troubled mother. Even going for full custody is another form of abuse to punish the abused spouse. Can an abuser expertly manipulate? does a bear shite in the woods?
What charter is this? Any examples of this charter being adhered to in relation to other investigations previously?
I'd assume he means the safeguarding policy.
I'm not sure the sequence of events describe here are correct though. It was my understanding the investigation happened long before any of these claims had been made online. So by the time his ex wife put it in the public domain the police investigation had already happened. In that case, the gaa has no grounds to do anything and also shouldn't be questioning any social services decisions around his kids.
I could be wrong g on the sequencing, but that was my understanding of what happened.
Just to reiterate though, if he was proved to have done what he was accused of, I'd be the first to say only place for him is prison.
This relates to the safeguarding of children though does it not?
Quote from: general_lee on March 23, 2024, 11:26:07 AMWhen allegations of violence against women/kids are reported to the police and they start an investigation, then the GAA are obliged by charter to stand down the accused ntil the investigation is over. This did not happen in Nicola's case. RG was not stood down while the police investigated her allegations twice, sent the files on to the prosecutor where they were dropped. As it stands now for RG in the GAA code book world, he's free to take up any coaching appointment. I doubt if there is any process for investigating a breach of GAA ethics or what could even be defined as a breach. Possibly if there was an attack on a woman on GAA property?Quote from: nrico2006 on March 23, 2024, 09:53:54 AMWere DJ Carey, Gerard Cavlan or Darren Gleeson ever banned?Speaking of completely irrelevant tangents; and this is purely hypothetical here... but if allegations were to emerge of a former county player/county manager committing child abuse, what happens then?
If the alleged victim was to go public on social media with a lengthy post detailing allegations dating back 27 years, do we take it at face value or do we dismiss it as one person's word against another's?